Impact of injections during diagnostic coronary arteriography on coronary patency in the setting of acute myocardial infarction from the TIMI trials. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction.
Department of Medicine, University of California Medical Center, San Francisco 94118, USA.The American Journal of Cardiology (Impact Factor: 3.28). 01/2001; 86(12):1378-9, A5. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01248-0
The mechanical force of injection at 90 minutes opens 13.4% of occluded arteries, but overall, only 2.4% of all culprit arteries (already open and occluded combined) are opened. Thus, although some arteries are opened by the force of hand injection, the frequency of mechanical opening among all arteries is low, and hand injections appear to alter current 80% patency rates by approximately 2.5%.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The establishment of patency (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] grade 2 or 3 flow) and/or TIMI grade 3 flow at 60 minutes after thrombolytic administration is both a univariate and multivariate predictor of in-hospital and 30-day mortality, and the odds ratios for mortality are nearly identical for TIMI grade 3 flow at 60 and 90 minutes. Thus, the 60-minute angiographic end point appears to be a valid alternative to that at 90 minutes and may permit earlier decisions regarding post-thrombolytic intervention.The American Journal of Cardiology 03/2001; 87(4):450-3, A6. DOI:10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01402-8 · 3.28 Impact Factor
- Circulation 07/2004; 109(25):3096-105. DOI:10.1161/01.CIR.0000134278.50359.CB · 14.43 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Administration of fibrinolytic, antiplatelet, and antithrombotic agents by the intracoronary route may disaggregate clot, but the potential role of the mechanical force of the injection itself in decreasing clot burden has not been studied. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who were pretreated in the emergency room (ER) with unfractionated heparin and aspirin in the TITAN-TIMI 34 study were randomized to treatment with eptifibatide in the ER (n = 131) versus after diagnostic catheterization (n = 150). Quantitative coronary angiography was used to assess change in diameter stenosis from time of first contrast injection to injection before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) immediately preceding wire placement down the culprit artery in a matching view. Successful perfusion of the myocardium was assessed after PCI by the presence of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction myocardial perfusion grade of 2 or 3. In patients treated with eptifibatide in the ER, there was a 1.3% absolute improvement in diameter stenosis from the first injection to the injection before PCI (p = 0.02), whereas there was no change in diameter stenosis in patients not treated with eptifibatide in the ER (0.0%, p = NS). Each 1% improvement in percent diameter stenosis during diagnostic injections before PCI was strongly correlated with an open muscle after PCI (adjusted odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.16, p = 0.012). In conclusion, the mechanical force of a contrast injection decreases thrombotic burden in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction pretreated with eptifibatide but not with placebo. Future trials of intracoronary pharmacotherapies should include a control arm in which saline is injected to account for the potential clot disaggregation that occurs as a result of iodinated contrast injections, particularly if the patient has been pretreated with aggressive pharmacotherapy.The American Journal of Cardiology 08/2007; 100(1):13-7. DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.01.068 · 3.28 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.