Article

A role for Drosophila Drac1 in neurite outgrowth and synaptogenesis in the giant fiber system.

Department of Biology, Morrill Science Center, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA.
Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience (Impact Factor: 3.73). 01/2001; 16(6):754-65. DOI: 10.1006/mcne.2000.0903
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Recent studies have shown the small GTPases, Rac1, Rho, and CDC42, to have a role in axon guidance. To assess their participation in synapse assembly and function we have expressed various forms of Drac1 in the giant fiber system of Drosophila. Overexpression of wild-type Drac1 in the giant fiber (GF) lead to a disruption in axonal morphology; axons often terminate prematurely in a large swelling in the target area but lack the normal lateral bend where the synapse with the jump motor neuron would normally be found. Electrophysiological assays revealed longer latencies and lowering following frequencies indicating defects in the synapse between the GF and the tergotrochanteral motor neuron (TTMn). Thickened abnormal GF dendrites were also observed in the brain. Overexpression of the dominant-negative form of Drac1, (N17), resulted in axons that produced extra branches in the second thoracic neuromere (T2); however, the synaptic connection to the TTMn was present and functioned normally. Conversely, expression of the constitutively active form, Drac1(V12), resulted in a complete lack of neurite outgrowth and this was also seen with overexpression of Dcdc42(V12). In the absence of a GF, these flies showed no response in the jump (TTM) or flight (DLM) muscles upon brain stimulation. Taken together these results show that the balance of actin polymerization and depolymerization determines local process outgrowth and thereby synapse structure and function.

0 Followers
 · 
70 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The formation of a neurite, the basis for axons and dendrites, begins with the concerted accumulation and organization of actin and microtubules. Whereas much is known about the proteins that play a role in these processes, because they perform similar functions in axon branching and filopodia formation, much remains to be discovered concerning the interaction of these individual cytoskeletal regulators during neurite formation. Here, we review the literature regarding various models of filopodial formation and the way in which proteins that control actin organization and polymerization induce neurite formation. Although several different regulators of actin polymerization are involved in neurite initiation, redundancy occurs between these regulators, as the effects of the loss of a single regulator can be mitigated by the addition of neurite-promoting substrates and proteins. Similar to actin dynamics, both microtubule stabilizing and destabilizing proteins play a role in neurite initiation. Furthermore, interactions between the actin and microtubule cytoskeleton are required for neurite formation. Several lines of evidence indicate that the interactions between these two components of the cytoskeleton are needed for force generation and for the localization of microtubules at sites of nascent neurites. The general theme that emerges is the existence of several central regulatory pathways on which extracellular cues converge to control and organize both actin and microtubules to induce the formation of neurites.
    Cell and Tissue Research 07/2014; 359(1). DOI:10.1007/s00441-014-1955-0 · 3.33 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Development of the nervous system requires efficient extension and guidance of axons and dendrites culminating in synapse formation. Axonal growth and navigation during embryogenesis are controlled by extracellular cues. Many of the same extracellular signals also regulate axonal branching. The emergence of collateral branches from the axon augments the complexity of nervous system innervation and provides an additional mechanism for target selection. Rho-family GTPases play an important role in regulating intracellular cytoskeletal and signaling pathways that facilitate axonal morphological changes. RhoA/G and Rac1 GTPase functions are complex and they can induce or inhibit branch formation, depending on neuronal type, cell context or signaling mechanisms. Evidence of a role of Cdc42 in axon branching is mostly lacking. In contrast, Rac3 has thus far been implicated in the regulation of axon branching. Future analysis of the upstream regulators and downstream effectors mediating the effects of Rho-family GTPase will provide insights into the cellular processes effected, and shed light on the sometimes opposing roles of these GTPases in the regulation of axon branching.
    Small GTPases 03/2014; 5. DOI:10.4161/sgtp.27974
  • Source