Article

Improvement of afterload mismatch of left atrial booster pump function with positive inotropic agent.

Second Department of Internal Medicine, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Japan.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Impact Factor: 14.09). 01/2001; 37(1):270-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01060-3
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to examine the hypothesis that a positive inotropic agent improves left ventricular (LV) filling during left atrial (LA) contraction in the presence of markedly elevated LV filling pressure.
In patients with old myocardial infarction (MI), an increase in the operational LV chamber stiffness reduces LV filling during the LA contraction, resulting from an "afterload mismatch" of the LA booster pump function.
We investigated the effect of dobutamine infusion (3 microg/kg/min) on the LA pump function in the presence of elevated LV filling pressure induced by aortic constriction (Aoc) during acute MI in 10 dogs. Transmitral flow velocity was determined by transesophageal echocardiography, LV pressure by a micromanometer and LV volume by a conductance catheter. We measured the early (E) and late (A) diastolic peak transmitral flow velocities (cm/s) and LV chamber stiffness (deltaP/deltaV: mm Hg/ml; where deltaP is developed pressure and deltaV is the absolute filling volume during LA contraction).
When the deltaP/deltaV was increased by Aoc during MI (from 1.1 +/- 0.8 to 3.1 +/- 2.6 mm Hg/ml, p < 0.01), A decreased significantly (from 30 +/- 5 to 22 +/- 8 cm/s, p < 0.01), and the ratio of E to A increased (from 1.0 +/- 0.3 to 1.4 +/- 0.8, p < 0.05) compared with MI without Aoc, showing the pseudonormal transmitral flow pattern, the so called "LA afterload mismatch." Dobutamine under this condition significantly reduced the deltaP/deltaV (to 1.7 +/- 1.2 mm Hg/ml, p < 0.05), resulting in an increase in A (to 31 +/- 8 cm/s, p < 0.01) and a decrease in E/A (to 1.0 +/- 0.3, p < 0.05), and the transmitral flow became a prolonged relaxation pattern as in MI without Aoc in all dogs. There was an inverse correlation between the deltaP/deltaV and the time-velocity integral of A (r = -0.70, p < 0.01).
Dobutamine improved the afterload mismatch of the LA booster pump function. This effect may have been due to the reduction in LV operational chamber stiffness, resulting in an increase in the LA forward ejection into the LV.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
58 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Proper atrial function is essential for overall cardiovascular performance, mainly by its four major functions, namely, bioelectrical, hormonal, metabolic and hemodynamic. With regard to the latter, atria modulate ventricular filling by smoothing the transformation of the continuous venous return to the intermittent filling pattern of the ventricles during diastole through three main components: a phase of reservoir mainly during ventricular systole, a conduit phase during ventricular diastole and an active phase in late ventricular diastole. Although the atria assume a dynamic role in ventricular filling progression, atrial function and emptying pattern is, conversely, highly influenced by the ventricular diastolic wall stress, underlying the close connection observed between these chambers. This review focuses essentially on left atrial mechanical role, particularly on the physiological and clinical consequences of disturbed atrial compliance.
    Future Cardiology 03/2007; 3(2):175-83.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The interest in the left atrium (LA) has resurged over the recent years. In the early 1980s, multiple studies were conducted to determine the normal values of LA size. Over the past decade, LA size as an imaging biomarker has been consistently shown to be a powerful predictor of outcomes, including major public health problems such as atrial fibrillation, heart failure, stroke, and death. More recently, functional assessment of the LA has been shown to be, at least as, if not more robust, a marker of cardiovascular outcomes. Current available data suggest that the combined evaluation of LA size and LA function will augment prognostication. The aim of this review is to provide a critical appraisal of current echocardiographic techniques for the assessment of LA function and the implications of such assessment for prediction and disease prevention.
    European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging 06/2011; 12(6):421-30. · 3.67 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The severity of left ventricular involvement may differ between primary (PA) and familial amyloidosis (FA). This study examined whether differences in left atrial (LA) systolic function are also present. Twenty-eight patients (18 men, 10 women, aged 59 ± 12 years) with PA, 17(11 men, 6 women, aged 40 ± 11 years) with FA, and 25 normal controls (18 men, 7 women, aged 56 ± 14 years) underwent transthoracicM-mode, two-dimensional, and Doppler echocardiography. Left atrial volumes were determined at mitral valve (MV) opening (maximal, Vmax), electrocardiographic P wave (onset of atrial systole, Vp), and MV closure (minimal, Vmin) from the apical two-and four-chamber views using the biplane area-length method. Left atrial systolic function was assessed with the LA active emptying volume (ACTEV) = Vp-Vmin and fraction (ACTEF) = ACTEV/Vp. The E/A ratio was increased (1.34 ± 0.93 vs. 0.89 ± 0.3), whereas deceleration time was decreased (168.1 ± 33.7 vs. 196.2 ± 34.2 ms) in PA compared with FA (p < 0.05). Vmax and Vp were similar in PA and FA and greater than in the controls (46.6 ± 14 vs. 40 ± 11.4 vs. 27.1 ±6.3 cm3/m2, p<0.01, and33.4±11.6vs.29.7± 10.8 vs. 16.8 ± 3.8 cm3/m2, p<0.01, respectively). The ACTEV was lower in PA and in the controls than in FA (6.7 ± 2 vs. 6.2 ± 2.2 vs. 8.5± 3.3, respectively, p<0.05). The ACTEF was lower in PA than in FA and both were lower than those in the controls (20 ± 5% vs. 28 ± 7% vs. 36 ± 11%, respectively, p<0.01). Despite a similar increase in LA volume, LA systolic dysfunction is more pronounced in PA than in FA. This is most likely due to the restrictive left ventricular physiology possibly associated with depressed LA contractility in the former.
    Clinical Cardiology 12/2006; 27(9):528 - 532. · 1.83 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
20 Downloads
Available from
May 31, 2014