A truly hybrid interventional MR/X-ray system: feasibility demonstration.

Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-5488, USA.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Impact Factor: 3.21). 03/2001; 13(2):294-300. DOI: 10.1002/1522-2586(200102)13:2<294::AID-JMRI1042>3.3.CO;2-O
Source: PubMed


A system enabling both x-ray fluoroscopy and MRI in a single exam, without requiring patient repositioning, would be a powerful tool for image-guided interventions. We studied the technical issues related to acquisition of x-ray images inside an open MRI system (GE Signa SP). The system includes a flat-panel x-ray detector (GE Medical Systems) placed under the patient bed, a fixed-anode x-ray tube overhead with the anode-cathode axis aligned with the main magnetic field and a high-frequency x-ray generator (Lunar Corp.). New challenges investigated related to: 1) deflection and defocusing of the electron beam of the x-ray tube; 2) proper functioning of the flat panel; 3) effects on B0 field homogeneity; and 4) additional RF noise in the MR images. We have acquired high-quality x-ray and MR images without repositioning the object using our hybrid system, which demonstrates the feasibility of this new configuration. Further work is required to ensure that the highest possible image quality is achieved with both MR and x-ray modalities.

Download full-text


Available from: David L. Ergun,
24 Reads
  • Source
    • "However, proton beam transmission through any structure of a MRI system is not feasible. An open 0.5 T similar to the hybrid interventional MR/X-ray system by Fahrig et al (2001) seems more suitable. This approach will require a solution for the extended distance between the gantry and the patient. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many methods exist to improve treatment outcome in radiotherapy. Two of these are image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and proton therapy. IGRT aims at a more precise delivery of the radiation, while proton therapy is able to achieve more conformal dose distributions. In order to maximally exploit the sharp dose gradients from proton therapy it has to be combined with soft-tissue based IGRT. MRI-guided photon therapy (currently under development) offers unequalled soft-tissue contrast and real-time image guidance. A hybrid MRI proton therapy system would combine these advantages with the advantageous dose steering capacity of proton therapy. This paper addresses a first technical feasibility issue of this concept, namely the impact of a 0.5 T magnetic field on the dose distribution from a 90 MeV proton beam. In contrast to photon therapy, for MR-guided proton therapy the impact of the magnetic field on the dose distribution is very small. At tissue-air interfaces no effect of the magnetic field on the dose distribution can be detected. This is due to the low-energy of the secondary electrons released by the heavy protons.
    Physics in Medicine and Biology 10/2008; 53(20):5615-22. DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/53/20/003 · 2.76 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Numerous surgical navigation systems (SNS) have been developed to aid the operator by tracking the surgical tool with respect to the imaging device by dynamically referencing some fiducials (skin markers, bone screws, head-frame, etc.) attached to the patient's body. Although SNS have been commercially available for over a decade, they were not applied in the scanner room except in a handful of limited trials with low-field open MRI [26] [27] [31] [11] [23]. While the application of SNS on highfield closed MRI might seem obvious from certain perspectives, such a transition has not yet been witnessed. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) offers great potential for planning, guiding, monitoring and controlling interventions. MR arthrography (MRAr) is the imaging gold standard for assessing small ligament and fibrocartilage injury in joints. In contemporary practice, MRAr consists of two consecutive sessions: (1) an interventional session where a needle is driven to the joint space and MR contrast is injected under fluoroscopy or CT guidance; and (2) a diagnostic MRI imaging session to visualize the distribution of contrast inside the joint space and evaluate the condition of the joint. Our approach to MRAr is to eliminate the separate radiologically guided needle insertion and contrast injection procedure by performing those tasks on conventional high-field closed MRI scanners. We propose a 2D augmented reality image overlay device to guide needle insertion procedures. This approach makes diagnostic high-field magnets available for interventions without a complex and expensive engineering entourage. In preclinical trials, needle insertions have been performed in the joints of porcine and human cadavers using MR image overlay guidance; in all cases, insertions successfully reached the joint space on the first attempt.
    Computer Aided Surgery 02/2007; 12(1):2-14. DOI:10.3109/10929080601169930 · 0.69 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Global polynomial (GP) methods have been widely used to correct geometric image distortion of small-size (up to 30 cm) X-ray image intensifiers (XRIIs). This work confirms that this kind of approach is suitable for 40 cm XRIIs (now increasingly used). Nonetheless, two local methods, namely 3rd-order local un-warping polynomials (LUPs) and hierarchical radial basis function (HRBF) networks are proposed as alternative solutions. Extensive experimental tests were carried out to compare these methods with classical low-order local polynomial and GP techniques, in terms of residual error (RMSE) measured at points not used for parameter estimation. Simulations showed that the LUP and HRBF methods had accuracies comparable with that attained using GP methods. In detail, the LUP method (0.353 microm) performed worse than HRBF (0.348 microm) only for small grid spacing (15 x 15 control points); the accuracy of both HRBF (0.157 microm) and LUP (0.160 microm) methods was little affected by local distortions (30 x 30 control points); weak local distortions made the GP method poorer (0.320 microm). Tests on real data showed that LUP and HRBF had accuracies comparable with that of GP for both 30 cm (GP: 0.238 microm; LUP: 0.240 microm; HRBF: 0.238 microm) and 40 cm (GP: 0.164 microm; LUP: 0.164 microm; HRBF: 0.164 microm) XRIIs. The LUP-based distortion correction was implemented in real time for image correction in digital tomography applications.
    Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 04/2003; 41(2):151-63. DOI:10.1007/BF02344883 · 1.73 Impact Factor
Show more