Article

Effect of evaporation and mixing technique on die spacer thickness: a preliminary study.

School of Dental and Oral Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (Impact Factor: 1.42). 02/2001; 85(1):82-7.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Casting relief is required for proper seating of castings to allow for luting agent thickness. The application of die spacer to the die is the most common method of obtaining casting relief. Die spacer film thicknesses that are outside the ideal range of 25 to 40 microm can cause clinical problems. Thickness can be affected by the separation of die spacer constituents, which may not be reconstituted by mixing, in the bottle and by the evaporation of volatile components while the bottle is open.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of component evaporation and die spacer mixing technique on applied die spacer thickness.
Bottles of Gold Tru-fit die spacer were left open for 0, 1, 4, 8, and 24 hours at 22 degrees C. Spacer solutions were shaken either by hand per the manufacturer's directions or on a dental vibrator for 1 minute. One even brush stroke of spacer was applied to clean glass slides. Three die spacer films were made for each combination of time and mixing technique. Eighteen thickness measurements per sample at various sites were recorded with profilometer tracings. Statistical differences were determined with a 2-way ANOVA.
Handshaking provided greater die spacer thickness, which increased with the time that the bottle was open. Vibration provided lower thickness with no statistical increase with time.
Insufficient agitation caused lower film thickness. Excessive evaporation caused higher film thickness.

0 Followers
 · 
61 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of occlusal relief of dies on internal adaptation of metal-ceramic casting copings. Materials and Methods: Standardized preparations were made on 80 extracted third molar teeth. Impressions were made with poly(vinyl siloxane), and stone dies were prepared. Dies were covered with four layers of die spacer, covering the entire preparation together with the occlusal surface excluding the apical 0.5 mm of the preparation in group 1 (40 specimens), and covering the same area excluding the occlusal surface in group 2 (40 specimens). Copings were cast using nickel-chromium-based metal ceramic alloy and cemented using zinc phosphate cement. The specimens were sectioned along the long axis. Internal discrepancies were recorded with a 0.001-mm resolution stereoscope at 6 points: the middle of the occlusal surface (MO), middle of the lingual wall (ML), middle of the buccal wall (MB), middle of the buccal shoulder finish line (MSH), middle of the lingual chamfer finish line (MCH), and middle of the buccal bevel finish line (MBL). Student's t-test was used for statistical analysis. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. Results: The marginal discrepancies of group 1 were higher than those of group 2. Significant differences in discrepancies were found on MO (p < 0.0001), MSH (p = 0.012), and MBL (p= 0.035). The bevel margin showed the least marginal discrepancy following occlusal surface of the die with no relief. Conclusion: Leaving the occlusal part of the die uncovered with the die spacer improved the crown seating considerably in the occlusal surface as well as shoulder and bevel margins.
    Journal of Prosthodontics 12/2012; DOI:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00946.x · 0.91 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present study was to evaluate the space provided for the temporary luting cement, after the application of various coats of die spacers, during the fabrication of provisional crowns and bridges.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Z Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı, restorasyonları implant postuna yapıştırma amacıyla özel olarak üretilmiş reçine bazlı simanları tutuculuk direnci açısından geleneksel simanlarla karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Standart implant postu üç boyutlu dijital lazer tarayıcı ile tarandı. CAD/CAM sistemi yardımıyla 40 adet standart alt yapı üretildi. Alt yapılar her grupta 10 adet örnek olacak şekilde 4 farklı simanla (1) Premier Implant Cement (PIC), (2) TempBond NE (TB), (3) Multilink Implant (MI), (4) Adhesor Carbofine (AC) simante edildi. Örnekler üniversal test cihazı yardımıyla 0.5 mm/ dak hızda çekme testine tabi tutuldu. Desimantasyona sebep olan kuvvet miktarı Oneway Anova ve Tukey HSD testleri yardımıyla 95% güven aralığında değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Grupların tutuculuk düzeyleri arasında istatistiksel olarak ileri düzeyde anlamlı farklılık bulundu (p<0.01). Simanların retansiyon değerleri en düşükten yükseğe doğru şu şekilde sıralandı: TB (39,65±8,08 N), PIC (136,97±21,75 N), MI (301,60±28,43 N), AC (386,78±52,63 N). Sonuç: İmplant-destekli protezlerin simantasyonu için özel olarak geliştirilen reçine bazlı simanlar, geleneksel geçici simana oranla daha yüksek, geleneksel daimi simana göre ise daha düşük retantif özelliklere sahiptir. Anahtar kelimeler: Simantasyon, tutuculuk, implant-destekli kuron, geçici siman, daimi siman ABSTRACT Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the retentive strength of implant cements with con-ventionally used cements. Materials and Methods: Standard titanium abutment was scanned by means of a 3D digital laser scanner. 40 standard metal copings were designed by a CAD/CAM system. Copings were cemented to the abutments using 1 of 4 luting cements (n=10) as (1) Premier Implant Cement (PIC), (2) TempBond NE (TB), (3) Multilink Implant (MI), (4) Adhesor Carbofine (AC). Copings were subjected to a pull-out test using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Decementation load was analyzed with Oneway Anova and Tukey HSD tests at a confidence interval of 95%. Results: Cement groups showed statistically significant difference (p<0.01). Mean retentive strength of the groups were ranked as : TB (39,65±8,08 N), PIC (136,97±21,75 N), MI (301,60±28,43 N), AC (386,78±52,63 N). Conclusions: Decementation loads for the cements specifically formulated for usage with implant-supported restorations, were higher than that of conventional temporary cement and lower than that of conventional permanent cement.

Full-text

Download
3 Downloads
Available from
Mar 30, 2015