Effect of evaporation and mixing technique on die spacer thickness: a preliminary study.

School of Dental and Oral Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (Impact Factor: 1.42). 02/2001; 85(1):82-7.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Casting relief is required for proper seating of castings to allow for luting agent thickness. The application of die spacer to the die is the most common method of obtaining casting relief. Die spacer film thicknesses that are outside the ideal range of 25 to 40 microm can cause clinical problems. Thickness can be affected by the separation of die spacer constituents, which may not be reconstituted by mixing, in the bottle and by the evaporation of volatile components while the bottle is open.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of component evaporation and die spacer mixing technique on applied die spacer thickness.
Bottles of Gold Tru-fit die spacer were left open for 0, 1, 4, 8, and 24 hours at 22 degrees C. Spacer solutions were shaken either by hand per the manufacturer's directions or on a dental vibrator for 1 minute. One even brush stroke of spacer was applied to clean glass slides. Three die spacer films were made for each combination of time and mixing technique. Eighteen thickness measurements per sample at various sites were recorded with profilometer tracings. Statistical differences were determined with a 2-way ANOVA.
Handshaking provided greater die spacer thickness, which increased with the time that the bottle was open. Vibration provided lower thickness with no statistical increase with time.
Insufficient agitation caused lower film thickness. Excessive evaporation caused higher film thickness.

Download full-text


Available from: Robert F. Wright, Mar 30, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Z Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı, restorasyonları implant postuna yapıştırma amacıyla özel olarak üretilmiş reçine bazlı simanları tutuculuk direnci açısından geleneksel simanlarla karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Standart implant postu üç boyutlu dijital lazer tarayıcı ile tarandı. CAD/CAM sistemi yardımıyla 40 adet standart alt yapı üretildi. Alt yapılar her grupta 10 adet örnek olacak şekilde 4 farklı simanla (1) Premier Implant Cement (PIC), (2) TempBond NE (TB), (3) Multilink Implant (MI), (4) Adhesor Carbofine (AC) simante edildi. Örnekler üniversal test cihazı yardımıyla 0.5 mm/ dak hızda çekme testine tabi tutuldu. Desimantasyona sebep olan kuvvet miktarı Oneway Anova ve Tukey HSD testleri yardımıyla 95% güven aralığında değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Grupların tutuculuk düzeyleri arasında istatistiksel olarak ileri düzeyde anlamlı farklılık bulundu (p<0.01). Simanların retansiyon değerleri en düşükten yükseğe doğru şu şekilde sıralandı: TB (39,65±8,08 N), PIC (136,97±21,75 N), MI (301,60±28,43 N), AC (386,78±52,63 N). Sonuç: İmplant-destekli protezlerin simantasyonu için özel olarak geliştirilen reçine bazlı simanlar, geleneksel geçici simana oranla daha yüksek, geleneksel daimi simana göre ise daha düşük retantif özelliklere sahiptir. Anahtar kelimeler: Simantasyon, tutuculuk, implant-destekli kuron, geçici siman, daimi siman ABSTRACT Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the retentive strength of implant cements with con-ventionally used cements. Materials and Methods: Standard titanium abutment was scanned by means of a 3D digital laser scanner. 40 standard metal copings were designed by a CAD/CAM system. Copings were cemented to the abutments using 1 of 4 luting cements (n=10) as (1) Premier Implant Cement (PIC), (2) TempBond NE (TB), (3) Multilink Implant (MI), (4) Adhesor Carbofine (AC). Copings were subjected to a pull-out test using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Decementation load was analyzed with Oneway Anova and Tukey HSD tests at a confidence interval of 95%. Results: Cement groups showed statistically significant difference (p<0.01). Mean retentive strength of the groups were ranked as : TB (39,65±8,08 N), PIC (136,97±21,75 N), MI (301,60±28,43 N), AC (386,78±52,63 N). Conclusions: Decementation loads for the cements specifically formulated for usage with implant-supported restorations, were higher than that of conventional temporary cement and lower than that of conventional permanent cement.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The application of die spacer may affect the shear bond strength (SBS) of porcelain laminate veneer (PLV). However, there is no standard for the amount of die spacer necessary for the fabrication of PLV restorations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the SBS differences between enamel and a feldspathic PLV as a function of die spacer thickness. Eighty rectangular (5 x 3 x 1 mm) PLV (Super Porcelain EX-3) specimens were made using stone blocks on which die spacer (Nice Fit) was applied in different thicknesses (0, 2, 4, or 6 coats) (n = 20). Before bonding, all PLV specimens were pretreated with airborne-particle abrasion (1-, 2-, 3-, or 4-bar pressure; 10 sec/10-mm distance or 5 sec/20-mm distance) and cleaned with an ultrasonic cleanser. A vertically flat surface on the labial enamel of 80 freshly extracted sound teeth was prepared with a low-speed diamond-coated saw. The PLV specimens were bonded to the etched enamel specimens using a composite resin cement (RelyX Veneer). Forty enamel-ceramic specimens (Group NTc) were maintained in deionized water at room temperature for 1 week after cementation, and the other 40 specimens (Group Tc) were subjected to thermal cycling treatment (2500 cycles, 5 degrees C to 60 degrees C, 15-second dwell time). The SBS measurement was performed with a universal testing machine. The results were compared with a 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and mean values were compared with Fisher's Protected Least Significant Difference (PLSD) intervals (alpha = .05). For Group NTc specimens, the SBS values (MPa) were 8.7 +/- 2.6 (no coat), 12.6 +/- 4.8 (2 coats), 10.7 +/- 2.9 (4 coats), and 9.6 +/- 2.8 (6 coats). For Group Tc specimens, the SBS values were 4.1 +/- 2.0 (no coat), 7.1 +/- 3.4 (2 coats), 6.8 +/- 2.1 (4 coats), and 6.1 +/- 2.4 (6 coats). Two-way ANOVA showed that the SBS was influenced by the thermal cycling and the number of coats, but there was no significant interaction between the 2 variables. The Fisher's PLSD interval for the SBS for comparisons among the number of coats was 0.95. The group with 2 coats of die spacer showed higher SBS values than the group with no coat, whereas groups with more than 2 coats of die spacer resulted in similar SBS values when compared to each other. The thermal cycling treatment resulted in a significant decrease of the SBS. Group Tc showed a trend similar to Group NTc. Within the limitations of this study it was found that the appropriate application of die spacer exerts a favorable influence on the SBS of composite-bonded PLV. The 2-coat application of die spacer provides suitable space to accommodate the cement thickness.
    Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 04/2006; 95(3):201-8. DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.12.011 · 1.42 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of using die spacers on the marginal fit of NiCr (M1) and NiCrBe (M2) alloys and commercially pure titanium (cpTi) (M3) copings cast by the lost wax technique. Using a metal matrix, 45 resin added extra hard type IV stone models were obtained for the fabrication of wax patterns under the following conditions: no die spacer (A), with one die spacer layer (B) and with two die spacer layers (C), with five repetitions for each condition (alloy x die). Each die was waxed and the wax patterns were invested as per manufacturer's instructions. Three wax patterns were embedded in each casting ring, each corresponding to one of the conditions. Each coping, seated to the metal matrix by a seating pressure standardizing device (SPSD), was taken to an optical microscope for measurement of marginal discrepancy. The obtained data (microm) were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey' test (a=5%). There was statistically significant difference (p<0.05) among the materials (M1=110.67; M2=130.33 and M3=148.33). Regarding the use of the die spacer, there was a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) among the three conditions (A=162.00; B=131.06 and C=96.67). It was concluded that there is less marginal discrepancy with two die spacer layers.
    Brazilian dental journal 01/2007; 18(3):225-30. DOI:10.1590/S0103-64402007000300009