Improving continuing medical education for surgical techniques: applying the lessons learned in the first decade of minimal access surgery.

Department of Surgery, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, USA.
Annals of Surgery (Impact Factor: 7.19). 03/2001; 233(2):159-66. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200102000-00003
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To examine the first decade of experience with minimal access surgery, with particular attention to issues of training surgeons already in practice, and to provide a set of recommendations to improve technical training for surgeons in practice.
Concerns about the adequacy of training in new techniques for practicing surgeons began almost immediately after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The concern was restated throughout the following decade with seemingly little progress in addressing it.
A preliminary search of the medical literature revealed no systematic review of continuing medical education for technical skills. The search was broadened to include educational, medical, and psychological databases in four general areas: surgical training curricula, continuing medical education, learning curve, and general motor skills theory.
The introduction and the evolution of minimal access surgery have helped to focus attention on technical skills training. The experience in the first decade has provided evidence that surgical skills training shares many characteristics with general motor skills training, thus suggesting several ways of improving continuing medical education in technical skills.
The educational effectiveness of the short-course type of continuing medical education currently offered for training in new surgical techniques should be established, or this type of training should be abandoned. At present, short courses offer a means of introducing technical innovation, and so recommendations for improving the educational effectiveness of the short-course format are offered. These recommendations are followed by suggestions for research.

  • Source
    Gunter De Win, Wouter Everaerts, Dirk De Ridder, Griet Peeraer
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the exposure of Belgian residents in urology, general surgery, and gynecology to laparoscopic surgery and to training of laparoscopic skills in dedicated training facilities. Methods: Three similar specialty-specific questionnaires were used to interrogate trainees in urology, general surgery, and gynecology about their exposure to laparoscopic procedures, their acquired laparoscopic experience, training patterns, training facilities, and motivation. Residents were contacted via their Belgian specialist training organization, using Survey Monkey as an online survey tool. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Results: The global response rate was 58%. Only 28.8% of gynecology respondents, 26.9% of urology respondents, and 52.2% of general surgery respondents felt they would be able to perform laparoscopy once they had finished their training. A total 47% of urology respondents, 66.7% of general surgery respondents, and 69.2% of gynecology respondents had a surgical skills lab that included laparoscopy within their training hospital or university. Most training programs did not follow the current evidence about proficiency-based structured simulation training with deliberate practice. Conclusion: Belgian resident training facilities for laparoscopic surgery should be optimized.
    Advances in Medical Education And Practice. 02/2015; 2015(6):55-63.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Structured learning events termed reflective activities are now widely used throughout work-related learning. These activities are thought to occasion reflection, critical reflection and reflective practice. Although researchers have established benefits and outcomes associated with reflective activities in work-related communicative learning contexts, the effect of reflective activities in work-related instrumental learning contexts is largely unknown. Stakeholders remain dependent on contradictory and conceptual suppositions to justify their use of these activities. This article reviews empirical studies examining the relationship between reflective activities and instrumental learning outcomes with adult learners. Prominent adult learning theories are assessed for relevant predictions. Consequently, empirical studies examining skill-adaptation as a theoretically predicted outcome are examined. This review found few empirical studies with sufficient methodological controls to establish causal or correlative relationships between reflective activities and instrumental learning outcomes—including skill-adaptation. Conceptual discoveries are extended to expedite future investigations of this issue.
    Educational Research Review 07/2014; · 2.33 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Traditional evaluation of the learning curve (LC) of an operation has been retrospective. Furthermore, LC analysis does not permit patient safety monitoring. Objectives To prospectively monitor patient safety during the learning phase of robotic kidney transplantation (RKT) and determine when it could be considered learned using the techniques of statistical process control (SPC). Design, setting and participants From January through May 2013, 41 patients with end-stage renal disease underwent RKT with regional hypothermia at one of two tertiary referral centers adopting RKT. Transplant recipients were classified into three groups based on the robotic training and kidney transplant experience of the surgeons: group 1, robot trained with limited kidney transplant experience (n = 7); group 2, robot trained and kidney transplant experienced (n = 20); and group 3, kidney transplant experienced with limited robot training (n = 14). Intervention We employed prospective monitoring using SPC techniques, including cumulative summation (CUSUM) and Shewhart control charts, to perform LC analysis and patient safety monitoring, respectively. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Outcomes assessed included post-transplant graft function and measures of surgical process (anastomotic and ischemic times). CUSUM and Shewhart control charts are time trend analytic techniques that allow comparative assessment of outcomes following a new intervention (RKT) relative to those achieved with established techniques (open kidney transplant; target value) in a prospective fashion. Results and limitations CUSUM analysis revealed an initial learning phase for group 3, whereas groups 1 and 2 had no to minimal learning time. The learning phase for group 3 varied depending on the parameter assessed. Shewhart control charts demonstrated no compromise in functional outcomes for groups 1 and 2. Graft function was compromised in one patient in group 3 (p < 0.05) secondary to reasons unrelated to RKT. In multivariable analysis, robot training was significantly associated with improved task-completion times (p < 0.01). Graft function was not adversely affected by either the lack of robot training (p = 0.22) or kidney transplant experience (p = 0.72). Conclusions The LC and patient safety of a new surgical technique can be assessed prospectively using CUSUM and Shewhart control chart analytic techniques. These methods allow determination of the duration of mentorship and identification of adverse events in a timely manner. A new operation can be considered learned when outcomes achieved with the new intervention are at par with outcomes following established techniques. Patient summary Statistical process control techniques allowed for robust, objective, and prospective monitoring of robotic kidney transplantation and can similarly be applied to other new interventions during the introduction and adoption phase.
    European Urology 08/2014; · 10.48 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 4, 2014