Estimation of %VO2 reserve from heart rate during arm exercise and running.

Zinman College for Physical Education and Sport Science, Wingate Institute, Netanya, Israel.
Arbeitsphysiologie (Impact Factor: 2.3). 01/2001; 83(6):545-50. DOI: 10.1007/s004210000308
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the relationship between the percent heart rate reserve (%HRR) in arm exercise and the corresponding percent oxygen uptake (VO2) reserve, and to compare this relationship to that occurring in running. Fourteen male physical education students took part in the study. Each subject performed a maximal running exercise test and a maximal arm cycling test. The subjects also performed three submaximal exercise bouts (in both exercise modes) at 30%, 60% and 80% of their HRR. The subjects were monitored for their heart rate (HR) at rest, maximal HR (HRmax), HR at submaximal work loads. maximal VO2 (VO2max), VO2 at rest and VO2 at submaximal loads. For each subject, load and exercise mode, %HRR and %VO2 reserve were calculated (from HRmax and VO2max as measured during running and arm cycling) and the relationship between the two was evaluated. The main finding of the present investigation is that the prediction of %VO2 reserve in arm cycling from %HRR is grossly overestimated when calculated from HRmax and VO2max measured during running. The prediction is better but still overestimated when calculated from HRmax and VO2max measured during arm cycling. The findings indicate a better prediction of %VO2 reserve from %HRR for running than for arm exercise. These findings should be taken into consideration when prescribing the target HR for arm training.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to compare the growth factors (testosterone, growth hormone, insulin growth factor and insulin growth factor binding protein-3) concentration s and physiological responses during eccentric and concentric muscle contractions in strength trained athletes. A group of nine subjects performed an incremental exercise test requiring con- centric and eccentric muscle contractions. Serum growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP -3) were assessed, before and after both types of exer - cise. The concentrations of IGF-I and GH tended to be higher during ex- ercise than at rest and reached the level of statistical significance at maximal exercise intensity (p
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Due to the well-documented linear relationship between heart rate and oxygen consumption (VO2), heart rate is commonly used to estimate energy expenditure during exercise. However, previous research suggests that heart rate increases without a concomitant rise in VO2 when arm movements are added to exercise. If so, this could impact the accuracy of heart rate monitors in estimating energy expenditure during combined arm and leg exercise. This study compared the cardiorespiratory responses to a bench step aerobics routine performed with and without arm movements and evaluated whether the accuracy of the Polar F6 heart rate monitor in predicting energy expenditure was impacted by the inclusion of arm movements. Thirty-two women performed the same routine with and without arm movements while stepping up and down off of a 15.24-cm bench at a cadence of 128 beats min. Heart rate and VO2 increased while oxygen pulse (VO2 heart rate) decreased when arm movements were added (p <.001). However, the differences between the energy expenditure estimated by the Polar F6 heart rate monitor and the energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry were similar during the same aerobic bench stepping routine performed with and without arms ([INCREMENT]∼2 kCal min, p≥.05). Results confirm that arm movements during aerobic bench stepping elicit a disproportionate rise in heart rate relative to VO2. However, results do not support that these movements increase the prediction error in energy expenditure, as the Polar F6 heart rate monitor over predicted energy expenditure when arm movements were involved and when they were not involved.
    The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 01/2014; DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000382 · 1.86 Impact Factor
  • Source


Available from