Article

Developmental instability in japanese quail genetically selected for contrasting adrenocortical responsiveness.

Department of Poultry Science, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge 70803, USA.
Poultry Science (Impact Factor: 1.52). 12/2000; 79(12):1710-4.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Differences in developmental instability were assessed with Japanese quail of two lines that had been genetically selected over several generations for reduced (low stress, LS) or exaggerated (high stress, HS) plasma corticosterone response to brief mechanical restraint. At 32 wk of age, three bilateral traits were selected for study in each quail line. The characteristics chosen were length of the metatarsus (shank length, SHL), diameter of the shank (SHD) perpendicular to the spur, and distance between the auditory canal and the nares (face length, FL). Significantly greater bilateral trait size variances were associated with the measurement of SHL (P < 0.0088) and FL (P < 0.0016) in the HS line than in the LS line. SHD variances did not differ (P = 0.22) in quail of the HS and LS lines. These findings suggest that developmental instability (i.e., fluctuating asymmetry, FA) is more pronounced in HS quail than in LS quail. Previous studies have shown that not only do quail of the HS line show greater adrenocortical responsiveness to a wide range of stressors but that they are also more easily frightened than LS birds. Therefore, the line differences in FA found here may reflect the birds' differential responsiveness to chronic social and physical environmental stressors. The present findings also support previous suggestions that measuring asymmetries in bilateral traits could be an additional and valid method of assessing stress and of comparing phenotypic stability in selected populations.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
71 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It has been suggested that fluctuating asymmetry (FA) reflects an animal's ability to cope with the sum of challenges during its growing period and, thus, is a potential welfare indicator. In this review we investigate the evidence of associations between FA and other welfare indicators measured at the level of the individual and of effects of welfare-relevant environmental conditions on FA in populations of captive birds and mammals including humans. As the question of validity cannot be treated independently from the quality of the available data, first a checklist for the proper measurement and analysis of FA is drafted and used to evaluate the methodological quality of the various studies. We recommend this checklist to be used as a standard for future FA studies. We found 17 relevant studies on associations between FA and other welfare indicators, and 36 studies on effects of welfare-relevant factors on FA. Frequent methodological shortcomings or insufficient methodological information allow for only cautious conclusions. The proportion of significant results supporting the link between higher FA and poorer welfare is only moderately high. Independent from statistical significance, almost all studies found the relationship between FA and welfare to be prevailingly in the expected direction. FA is a promising measure of animal welfare, despite a great number of open questions, e.g. relating to the ontogeny of FA or its sensitivity to various stressors. The considerable potential of FA as a welfare indicator makes it worthwhile to pursue more intensely validation studies as well as applied studies. These studies should pay particular attention to an appropriate methodological approach.
    Physiology & Behavior 11/2007; 92(3):398-421. · 3.16 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The effect of no treatment (undisturbed controls; CON) or 5 min exposure to immobilization stress (STR) before assessment of open-field behavior in Japanese quail lines selected for high (high stress; HS) or low (low stress; LS) plasma corticosterone (B) response to a similar immobilization stress was examined. During a 5-min test period in an open field, the following behavioral measurements were made: the latency to ambulate (LAMB), the number of open-field floor sectors entered (SECTORS), and freezing behavior (total time spent in complete silence and inactivity, apart from slight movements associated with respiration; FREEZE). A further measure of ambulation across time (ambulation rate; ARATE) was calculated using the formula: ARATE = (SECTORS/[(300 s test ceiling)--LAMB)]. The LS-quail showed higher (P < 0.04) ARATE and lower (P < 0.05) FREEZE behavior than did their HS counterparts. When compared with the CON, quail exposed to STR showed decreased ARATE (P < 0.02) and numbers of open-field SECTORS entered (P < 0.04). More importantly, the LS-CON exhibited a higher (P < 0.05) mean ARATE, less FREEZE behavior, and increased numbers of SECTORS entered than did the other 3 treatment groups (LS-STR, HS-CON, and HS-STR), all of which showed similar responses for these variables. The LS-CON vs. HS-CON findings support our contention that selection for reduced adrenocortical responsiveness has been accompanied by a concomitant decrease in underlying fearfulness (exemplified herein by heightened activity in the open field in LS-CON). We further show here that this relationship was eliminated by application of an acute stressor before open-field testing of LS quail, wherein a reduction in activity similar to that found in both HS quail treatment groups was evident in comparison to the LS-CON.
    Poultry Science 03/2006; 85(3):404-9. · 1.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Developmental stability of several Japanese quail lines was measured by bilateral asymmetry. Lines included in the study were as follows: a randombred control (R1), sublines of R1 selected for increased (HW line) and decreased (LW line) 4-wk BW, and sublines of R1 selected for increased (HP line) or decreased (LP line) total plasma phosphorus (TPP; a measure of yolk precursor in the blood) at the beginning of lay. In sublines of the HW line, the males were selected for increased 4-wk BW and the females for increased (HW-HP line) or decreased (HW-LP line) TPP. The HW, LW, HP, and LP lines were in their 41st generation of selection and the HW-HP and HW-LP lines in their 31st generation of selection. The number of birds in each line and sex subgroup was 30. The adult breeders (28 to 32 wk of age) were weighed and killed, and bilateral measurements were made of shank length, width (laterally at the dew claw), and depth (perpendicular to the dew claw), face length, and pectoralis major and p. minor weights. Data on asymmetry was expressed for the right side minus the left side as signed and absolute differences. In order to correct for the correlation between trait size and asymmetry, relative asymmetry (RA) was obtained by dividing the absolute differences between sides by the average value of both sides and multiplying by 100. All lines differed in BW at 4 wk of age with the ranking HW > HW-LP > HW-HP > LP > R1 > HP > LW. Line rankings of adult breeders were similar, except the HP and LP lines did not differ from the R1 line and the order of ranking of the HW-HP and HW-LP lines was opposite that at 4 wk of age. Line differences in signed and absolute differences were significant for most bilateral traits. However, after adjustment for trait size, line differences in RA were less frequent. In general, there were few significant differences in RA for the R1 line versus the selected lines, even though inbreeding of the R1 line (19%) was less than half that of the selected lines (44 to 57%), suggesting that homozygosity did not influence developmental stability. Selection for increased or decreased BW had little influence on RA. Developmental stability tended to be higher in the lines (LP and HW-LP) selected for decreased TPP. The data indicated that bilateral asymmetry was not a good measure of developmental stability in the current study.
    Poultry Science 03/2002; 81(2):160-8. · 1.52 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
1 Download
Available from