Evidence of adaptive divergence in plasticity: Density- and site-dependent selection on shade-avoidance responses in Impatiens capensis

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA.
Evolution (Impact Factor: 4.61). 01/2001; 54(6):1956-68. DOI: 10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[1956:EOADIP]2.0.CO;2
Source: PubMed


We investigated the conditions under which plastic responses to density are adaptive in natural populations of Impatiens capensis and determined whether plasticity has evolved differently in different selective environments. Previous studies showed that a population that evolved in a sunny site exhibited greater plasticity in response to density than did a population that evolved in a woodland site. Using replicate inbred lines in a reciprocal transplant that included a density manipulation, we asked whether such population differentiation was consistent with the hypothesis of adaptive divergence. We hypothesized that plasticity would be more strongly favored in the sunny site than in the woodland site; consequently, we predicted that selection would be more strongly density dependent in the sunny site, favoring the phenotype that was expressed at each density. Selection on internode length and flowering date was consistent with the hypothesis of adaptive divergence in plasticity. Few costs or benefits of plasticity were detected independently from the expressed phenotype, so plasticity was selected primarily through selection on the phenotype. Correlations between phenotypes and their plasticity varied with the environment and would cause indirect selection on plasticity to be environment dependent. We showed that an appropriate plastic response even to a rare environment can greatly increase genotypic fitness when that environment is favorable. Selection on the measured characters contributed to local adaptation and fully accounted for fitness differences between populations in all treatments except the woodland site at natural density.

Download full-text


Available from: Kathleen Donohue, Apr 01, 2014
  • Source
    • "Indeed, there is some evidence that changes in competitive regimes can affect selection on plant traits within populations. For example, in experiments measuring phenotypic selection on plants grown with and without competitors, altered competition with conspecifics (Donohue et al. 2000) and heterospecifics (Weinig 2000; Tiffin 2002; Lau 2008) can affect selection on plant traits. The direction of selection can also differ depending on whether plants are surrounded by conspecifics or heterospecifics (Lankau and Strauss 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Plant diversity can affect ecological processes such as competition and herbivory, and these ecological processes can act as drivers of evolutionary change. However, surprisingly little is known about how ecological variation in plant diversity can alter selective regimes on members of the community. Here, we examine how plant diversity at two different scales (genotypic and species diversity) impacts natural selection on a focal plant species, the common evening primrose (Oenothera biennis). Because competition is frequently relaxed in both genotypically and species rich plant communities, we hypothesized that increasing diversity would weaken selection on competitive ability. Changes in plant diversity can also affect associated arthropod communities. Therefore, we hypothesized that diversity would alter selection on plant traits mediating these interactions, such as herbivory related traits. We grew 24 focal O. biennis genotypes within four different neighbourhoods: genotypic monocultures or polycultures of O. biennis, and species monocultures or polycultures of old-field species that commonly co-occur with O. biennis. We then measured genotypic selection on nine plant traits known to be ecologically important for competition and herbivory. Focal O. biennis plants were smaller, flowered for shorter periods of time, had lower fitness, and experienced greater attack from specialist predispersal seed predators when grown with conspecifics versus heterospecifics. While neither conspecific nor heterospecific diversity altered trait means, both types of diversity altered the strength of selection on focal O. biennis plants. Specifically, selection on plant biomass was stronger in conspecific monocultures versus polycultures, but weaker in heterospecific monocultures versus polycultures. We found no evidence of selection on plant traits that mediate insect interactions, despite differences in arthropod communities on plants surrounded by conspecifics versus heterospecifics. Our data demonstrate that plant genotypic and species diversity can act as agents of natural selection, potentially driving evolutionary changes in plant communities.
    Evolutionary Ecology 11/2014; 28(6):1139-1153. DOI:10.1007/s10682-014-9727-6 · 2.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "studies of several plant species report that there is selection for plasticity in flowering time in 66 response to an increase in density (Thomas & Bazzaz, 1993; Donohue et al., 2000; Weinig et 67 al., 2006). Interestingly, these studies show that genotypes differ in the level and direction of 68 plastic responses to changing plant population density (i.e. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Different genotypes often exhibit opposite plastic responses in the timing of the onset of flowering with increasing plant density. In experimental studies, selection for accelerated flowering is generally found. By contrast, game theoretical studies predict that there should be selection for delayed flowering when competition increases.Combining different optimality criteria, the conditions under which accelerated or delayed flowering in response to density would be selected for are analysed with a logistic growth simulation model.To maximize seed production at the whole-stand level (simple optimization), selection should lead to accelerated flowering at high plant density, unless very short growing seasons select for similar onset of flowering at all densities. By contrast, selection of relative individual fitness will lead to delayed flowering when season length is long and/or growth rates are high.These different results give a potential explanation for the observed differences in direction of the plastic responses within and between species, including homeostasis, as a result of the effect of the variation in season length on the benefits of delayed flowering. This suggests that limited plasticity can evolve without the costs and limits that are currently thought to constrain the evolution of plasticity.
    New Phytologist 08/2014; 205(1). DOI:10.1111/nph.12984 · 7.67 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Integrative and Comparative Biology, pp. 1–8 doi:10.1093/icb/icu078 Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology et al. 1998; Donohue et al. 2000; Lind et al. 2007; Hollander 2008; Baythavong 2011). Similar conditions are predicted to select for TGP (Uller 2008; Day and Bonduriansky 2011; Bonduriansky et al. 2012); TGP is predicted to be favored when (1) there is environmental heterogeneity across generations , (2) offspring's environmental conditions are predictable from parental environmental conditions, and (3) the costs of cue-induction are low for parents and offspring. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rising temperatures associated with global climatic change threaten the persistence of species. Determining how species adapt to environmental change is paramount. Much work has shown that environmental stressors have the potential to induce phenotypic changes that span multiple generations. Such transgenerational plasticity (TGP) represents a mechanism that may allow for rapid responses to global climatic change. Yet, our understanding of thermal TGP beyond the relationship between parent and offspring is limited. We evaluated thermal TGP in development across three generations (i.e., F0, F1, and F2) in zooplankton (Daphnia ambigua) from lakes in Connecticut. We found that the temperatures at which parents and grandparents were reared significantly influenced age at maturation in the grand-offspring. Comparisons between the F0 and F1 generation show that the offspring of parents reared at low temperatures matured significantly faster than the offspring of parents reared at a higher temperature. However, age at maturation in the grand-offspring was influenced by the interactive effects of parents and grandparents. Such an effect yielded trends that were not readily predicted from the previous generations and whose adaptive significance is unclear. Our results thus call for additional theoretical and empirical work to better understand the transgenerational effects of temperature.
    Integrative and Comparative Biology 06/2014; 54(5). DOI:10.1093/icb/icu078 · 2.93 Impact Factor
Show more