Article
Two computerized methods used to analyze intracranial pressure B waves: comparison with traditional visual interpretation.
Department of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, University of Umeå, Sweden.
Journal of Neurosurgery (impact factor:
2.96).
04/2001;
94(3):392-6.
DOI:10.3171/jns.2001.94.3.0392
pp.392-6
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (1)
-
Article: Real-time estimation of cerebrospinal fluid system parameters via oscillating pressure infusion.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Hydrocephalus is related to a disturbed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) system. For diagnosis, lumbar infusion test are performed to estimate outflow conductance, C (out), and pressure volume index, PVI, of the CSF system. Infusion patterns and analysis methods used in current clinical practice are not optimized. Minimizing the investigation time with sufficient accuracy is of major clinical relevance. The aim of this study was to propose and experimentally evaluate a new method, the oscillating pressure infusion (OPI). The non-linear model of the CSF system was transformed into a linear time invariant system. Using an oscillating pressure pattern and linear system identification methods, C (out) and PVI with confidence intervals, were estimated in real-time. Forty-two OPI and constant pressure infusion (CPI) investigations were performed on an experimental CSF system, designed with PVI = 25.5 ml and variable C (out). The ARX model robustly estimated C (out) (mean C (out,OPI) - C (out,CPI) = 0.08 μl/(s kPa), n = 42, P = 0.68). The Box-Jenkins model proved most reliable for PVI (23.7 ± 2.0 ml, n = 42). The OPI method, with its oscillating pressure pattern and new parameter estimation methods, efficiently estimated C (out) and PVI as well as their confidence intervals in real-time. The results from this experimental study show potential for the OPI method and supports further evaluation in a clinical setting.Medical & Biological Engineering 11/2010; 48(11):1123-31. · 1.76 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
acceptable approximation
B wave
B waves
B-wave content
B-wave power
computer algorithms
ICP B-wave activity
ICP recording
ICP recordings
idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome
individual wave
intracranial pressure
Method II
modern technology
monitoring time
preoperative predictive factors
total monitoring time
traditional visual interpretation
two computerized algorithms
visual estimation