Morbidity and mortality in patients waiting for coronary artery bypass surgery.

Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (Impact Factor: 2.67). 04/2001; 19(3):260-5. DOI: 10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00580-2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To describe morbidity and mortality in patients waiting for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and to assess determinants for the occurrence of these complications.
A prospective cohort study was carried out in a tertiary referral general teaching hospital. Three hundred and sixty consecutive patients with a priority of routine or urgent who were accepted for CABG or CABG with additional valve surgery were evaluated. Follow-up began from the moment of acceptance until the procedure took place for cardiac death, myocardial infarction and unstable angina requiring hospital admission.
The median (25-75th percentile) waiting time in the two priority groups was 100 (79-119) days for the routine group and 69 (38-91) days for the urgent group. Overall, eight patients died, seven suffered a myocardial infarction, and 33 episodes of unstable angina requiring immediate hospitalization occurred. The majority of events took place during the first 30 days on the waiting list. Unstable angina less than 3 months before acceptance was identified as an independent predictor (hazard ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.2-5.1) for complications during the wait. The prognostic value of smoking and familial cardiovascular disease was found to vary depending on the priority assigned to the patient.
Complications occur relatively early during the time on the waiting list. If complications in coronary heart disease cannot be predicted more accurately, the only way to diminish the complication rate is drastic reduction of waiting times.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery improves quality of life and survival rates. However, prolonged waits for this surgery are inevitable in countries having nationalized healthcare systems. Although no significant decline in the waiting times for this surgery has been demonstrated, recent research in psychological experiences of the patients is lacking Objectives: 1) To describe psychological experiences, anxiety and uncertainty, and quality of life in Omani patients awaiting coronary artery bypass graft. 2) To examine the significance of sociodemographics, health characteristics and the waiting time in predicting anxiety and uncertainty. 3) To examine the independent effect of anxiety and uncertainty in predicting quality of life of the patients. Methods: This study used a cross-sectional design. To obtain the required information, two nurses interviewed a convenience sample of hospitalized patients for coronary artery bypass graft (N = 84) between May 2011 and June 2012. Three regression analyses were used to identify significant predictors of anxiety, uncertainty and quality of life. Results: Literate patients and those with infrequent hospital admissions were more likely to experience high levels of anxiety, whereas, patients without myocardial infarction but having hypertension, and those who waited for the surgery 60 days or less were more likely to report greater uncertainty. Exercising regularly, low family monthly income and short duration since diagnosis with coronary artery disease significantly predicted better quality of life Conclusion: Physiological disruptions and concomitant chronic illnesses have significant effects on the psychological experiences and quality of life of the patients.
    International Journal of Advanced Nursing Studies. 04/2014; 3(1):47-52.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Wait lists are a common tool for managing access to elective surgery. However, little evidence is available on the health impact of delaying surgery for various conditions. Other than preoperative mortality, adverse events experienced by patients while on a wait list have not been systematically examined. Without these data, appropriate access time for surgery must be determined on the basis of expert opinion. When treatment is delayed, the condition of a patient on a surgical wait list may deteriorate and require urgent medical attention. In this case, emergency admission for the awaited procedure may be regarded as an adverse effect of waiting. In this chapter, we present the results of recent wait list studies that quantified the risk of delayed treatment in patients accepted for coronary artery bypass surgery and in patients awaiting elective cholecystectomy. Our results have implications for developing waiting-time limits for elective surgical procedure.
    10/2006: pages 79-100;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Studies on access to health care are often interested in determining the relationship between the length of delay and the risk of adverse events while waiting. When access to elective surgery is rationed by wait lists, patients requiring and suitable for the operation are subject to competing events of surgery, pre-operative death, unplanned emergency admission or cancellation of surgery for other reasons. Methodologically, measuring the probability of adverse events in patients on wait lists for treatment is similar to quantifying the risk of an event during follow-up in a population exposed to competing risks. Although the Kaplan–Meier method is commonly used to summarize the probability of a primary event, such as death before surgery or unplanned emergency admission, over wait-list time, the estimates produced by this method are only interpretable in a hypothetical situation when all competing risks are eliminated without altering the risk of primary event. In this paper, we consider two other measures for summarizing wait-list data—cumulative incidence and conditional probability function of a competing event. To describe application of these methods in studying outcomes of delaying on surgical wait lists, we used data from a population-based prospective registry which collects the information on access to elective bypass surgery. The summary probabilities were quantified separately in two groups: high-severity at presentation were patients with either persistent unstable angina or stable angina and extensive coronary artery disease, and low-severity at presentation were stable symptomatic patients with limited disease. Our results suggest that the protracted delay for surgical revascularization carries a significant risk of death even in cardiac surgery patients judged to be low-severity at presentation.
    Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology 01/2006; 6(3):139-151.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 2, 2014