Deliberate self-harm patients who leave the accident and emergency department without a psychiatric assessment - A neglected population at risk of suicide

Centre for Suicide Research, Oxford University, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK.
Journal of Psychosomatic Research (Impact Factor: 2.84). 03/2001; 50(2):87-93. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3999(00)00225-7
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Deliberate self-harm (DSH) patients, despite their risk of suicide, are often discharged directly from accident and emergency (A&E) departments without undergoing a psychiatric assessment. The aims of this study were to determine the characteristics and outcome of these patients.
The characteristics of DSH patients who were discharged directly from an A&E department over a 2-year period were investigated, comparing those who had a psychiatric assessment with those who did not. In a matched control design, the outcome of a group of patients who did not receive a psychiatric assessment was compared with that of a group of patients who were assessed.
Of DSH patients who were discharged directly from the A&E department 58.9% (145/246) did not have a psychiatric assessment. Nonassessed patients were more likely to have a past history of DSH, to be in the 20-34 year age group, and to have exhibited difficult behaviour in the A&E department. Patients presenting between 5 p.m. and 9 a.m. were less likely to be assessed than those attending between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Further DSH during the subsequent year occurred in 37.5% of the nonassessed patients compared with 18.2% of matched assessed patients. They were also more likely to have psychiatric treatment.
A substantial proportion of DSH patients discharged directly from A&E departments do not receive a psychiatric assessment. Nonassessed patients may be at greater risk of further DSH and completed suicide than those who are assessed. Hospital services need to be organised such that DSH patients managed in A&E departments can receive an assessment of psychosocial problems and risk.

1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: The study examined changes in self-reported attitudes and practices related to suicide risk assessment among providers at emergency departments (EDs) during a three-phase quasi-experimental trial involving implementation of ED protocols for suicidal patients. Methods: A total of 1,289 of 1,828 (71% response rate) eligible providers at eight EDs completed a voluntary, anonymous survey at baseline, after introduction of universal suicide screening, and after introduction of suicide prevention resources (nurses) and a secondary risk assessment tool (physicians). Results: Among participants, the median age was 40 years old, 64% were female, and there were no demographic differences across study phases; 68% were nurses, and 32% were attending physicians. Between phase 1 and phase 3, increasing proportions of nurses reported screening for suicide (36% and 95%, respectively, p<.001) and increasing proportions of physicians reported further assessment of suicide risk (63% and 80%, respectively, p<.01). Although increasing proportions of providers said universal screening would result in more psychiatric consultations, decreasing proportions said it would slow down clinical care. Increasing proportions of nurses reported often or almost always asking suicidal patients about firearm access (18%-69%, depending on the case), although these numbers remained low relative to ideal practice. Between 35% and 87% of physicians asked about firearms, depending on the case, and these percentages did not change significantly over the study phases. Conclusions: These findings support the feasibility of implementing universal screening for suicide in EDs, assuming adequate resources, but providers should be educated to ask suicidal patients about firearm access.
    Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) 03/2015; DOI:10.1176/ · 1.99 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) and suicidal self-injury (SSI) co-occur in adults. The purpose of the current study was to examine differences and similarities in NSSI and SSI in adult women with respect to (1) methods used and lethality of methods, (2) intent and impulsivity of act, (3) precipitating events, and (4) consequences. The data consist of variables pertaining to 46 self-injurious acts committed by 16 Finnish female participants and recorded using Suicide Attempt Self-Injury Interviews (SASII). The data were analyzed using variables weighted by the number of acts. This study found several differences as well as similarities between the acts of SSI and those of NSSI: (a) the respective acts differ in the methods used, in the lethality of the methods, and in the expectations of resulting lethality of the acts, (b) they further differ in the functions the respective acts serve and (c) in some of the precipitating events and consequences. The acts were similar in (d) impulsivity of act and (e) some of the precipitating events and consequences. Because both types of behavior can occur within the same individual, and due to the progressing evolution between them, a thorough assessment of both NSSI and SSI needs to be completed. More emphasis needs to be placed on both the assessment of social connections and interpersonal conflict as well as how it informs the treatment. Because the behavior studied is multifunctional and changing, its treatment too needs to be customized to the multiple and changing needs of the individual patients, as opposed to diagnostic tailored treatment.
    Nordic psychology 02/2015; 67(1):27-45. DOI:10.1080/19012276.2014.997784 · 0.18 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hintergrund Suizidversuche und Suizidalität stellen für den Notarzt und für die Notaufnahme ein Problem dar, das mit hohem Zeitaufwand verbunden ist. Viele Notärzte fühlen sich in der Versorgung suizidaler Patienten überfordert. Versorgung Im Zentrum der Versorgung dieser Patienten steht der Aufbau einer tragfähigen Beziehung. Nur dann ist es möglich, im Sinne einer Krisenintervention therapeutisch zu intervenieren. Eine kurzfristige (oft einmalige) psychopharmakologische Behandlung kann unterstützend wirken. Psychiatrische Weiterbehandlung Zuerst muss die weitere mögliche Eigengefährdung und die hiermit verbundene Notwendigkeit einer stationären Behandlung in einer psychiatrischen Klinik entschieden werden. Für die ambulante Versorgung ist die sichere Vermittlung einer spezifischen psychotherapeutisch-psychiatrischen Therapie unter Mitwirkung von Angehörigen entscheidend.
    Notfall 10/2012; 15(7):586-592. DOI:10.1007/s10049-012-1580-y · 0.32 Impact Factor