Dimensions of self-rated mood in depressed, manic, and normal subjects

Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
Comprehensive Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 2.25). 05/2001; 42(3):196-201. DOI: 10.1053/comp.2001.23125
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Self-rated scales allow the comparison of subjective mood across the spectrum of manic, depressive, and euthymic states. This study examined the self-reported mood of manic, depressed, and normal subjects using a 23-item research instrument based on the Carroll-Klein model of bipolar disorder. The Multiple Visual Analog Scale (MVAS) measures the following dimensions: consummatory reward (seven items), incentive reward (two items), psychomotor speed (seven items), and central pain (seven items). The MVAS was completed by 31 manic inpatients, 43 depressed inpatients, and 29 normal volunteer subjects. Total scores, average item scores, and total dimension scores were obtained. Subjects also completed a global mood VAS and the Carroll Depression Scale (CDS). Groups were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Bonferroni-Dunn methods. In a separate post hoc analysis, the group of manic patients was divided at the median CDS score into "pure" and "dysphoric" manic subgroups. We found excellent congruence of average 23-item total MVAS scores with global VAS and CDS scores. Dimension scores on the MVAS conformed to the predictions of the Carroll-Klein model. Depressed patients differed significantly from both manic and normal subjects on each dimension. MVAS dimension scores of normal subjects did not differ significantly from those of manic patients. On the dimension of central pain, normal subjects had significantly less inhibited scores than the "pure" subgroup of manics. The results confirmed that the dimensions of the Carroll-Klein model are bipolar and orthogonal. By the MVAS technique, the self-reported mood of normal subjects is similar to the self-reported mood of manic patients on all dimensions of the Carroll-Klein model of bipolar disorder. The positive scores of both groups are clearly distinguished from the negative scores of depressed patients. Average MVAS scores of normal subjects approximated the conventional zero score only on the dimension of central pain. Normal subjects exhibit megalothymic (hyperthymia) on most dimensions of subjective mood. The negative MVAS scores of depressed patients are even more deviant from normal than the conventional scoring system would suggest.

Download full-text


Available from: Bernard J Carroll, Oct 20, 2014
13 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Because manic patients lack insight, they are generally considered unreliable observers of their own psychopathology. The present analyses sought to examine to what extent patient reports could improve formal diagnostic criteria for mania--and be validated against the Carroll-Klein (CK) psychobiological model of bipolarity. 104 DSM-IV acutely manic (hospitalized) patients provided self-assessment on the Ahearn--Carroll scale, the Multiple Visual Analogue Scales of Bipolarity (MVAS-BP). A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on MVAS-BP, and the data on factorial scores were then compared to dimensional scores according to the CK model and to factors on the Beigel-Murphy Manic State Rating Scale (MSRS) completed by psychiatrists. The PCA identified a general factor accounting for 33% of the total variance; after varimax rotation, seven independent factors emerged, essentially in coherence with the signs and symptoms of DSM-IV mania, except for the 'social disinhibition' factor, which does not figure out as a distinct criterion in DSM-IV. Strong correlations were obtained (r > or = 0.80) between the four major factors of MVAS-BP and the four dimensional categories of the CK model: 'Consummatory Reward' with F1 'Elation and Inflated Self-esteem' (r=0.93), 'Incentive Reward' with F2 'Activation' (r=0.84), 'Psychomotor Pressure' with F3 'Acceleration' (r=0.85), and 'Central Pain' with F4 'Anxiety-Depression' (r=0.84). The F2 'Activation' appeared to be strongly correlated (r > or = 0.70) to all categories of the CK model. Correlational analysis between the factor structure of MVAS-BP and the MSRS showed significant coefficients on the scores assessing the emotional factors of 'Elation' and 'Depression.' Among the MVAS-BP factors, only 'Activation' was correlated to the majority of clinician ratings as obtained by the MSRS. These findings provide overall construct validity to the DSM-IV criteria for mania. Self-assessment of this disorder appears feasible and potentially useful in practice; lack of insight, poor judgment, and distractibility obviously require assessment by a clinician. Although our data are correlational and require prospective validation, they nonetheless suggest that (1) activation should be raised to the status of the stem criterion for mania, (2) to specify mood as elated, depressive, anxious, or irritable, and (3) to give individual status to social disinhibition (indiscriminate gregariousness) as a core pathological behavior in mania. Combining clinician- and self-observation thus produces a more precise and complete phenomenology of mania. We finally submit that the foregoing reformulation provides a psychobiological basis to the manic construct as formulated in the Carroll-Klein model.
    Journal of Affective Disorders 01/2002; 67(1-3):89-96. DOI:10.1016/S0165-0327(01)00441-4 · 3.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pain coping strategies are associated with pain severity, psychological distress and physical functioning in populations with persistent pain. However, there is little evidence regarding the relationship between coping styles and recovery from recent musculoskeletal injuries. We performed a large, population-based prospective cohort study of traffic injuries to assess the relationship between pain coping strategies and recovery from whiplash injuries. Subjects were initially assessed within 6 weeks of the injury, with structured telephone interview follow-up at 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injury. Coping was measured at 6 weeks using the Pain Management Inventory and recovery was assessed at each subsequent follow-up period, using a global self-report question. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models showed that early use of passive coping strategies was independently associated with slower recovery. Depressive symptomatology (CES-D) was an effect modifier of this relationship. Without depressive symptomatology, those using high levels of passive coping recovered 37% slower than those using low levels of passive coping (HRR=0.63; 95% CI 0.44-0.91). However, in the presence of depressive symptomatology, those using high levels of passive coping recovered 75% more slowly than those who coped less passively (HRR=0.25; 95% CI 0.17-0.39). In other words, those with depressive symptoms but who used few passive coping strategies recovered four times more quickly than those with depressive symptoms who used high levels of passive coping. Active coping showed no independent association with recovery. These findings highlight the importance of early assessment of both coping behaviors and depressive symptomatology.
    Pain 10/2006; 124(1-2):18-26. DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2006.03.012 · 5.21 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Much of the current literature on bipolar disorder is focused on bipolar I (BP-I), and to a much lesser extent on bipolar II (BP-II). The French multi-center national EPIDEP study has, among its objectives, the feasibility of validating a broader spectrum of bipolarity (the so-called "soft spectrum") by practicing clinicians. In this report we test aspects of a bipolar schema proposed earlier by Akiskal and Pinto [Akiskal, H.S., Pinto, O., 1999. The evolving bipolar spectrum: Prototypes I, II, III, IV. Psychiatr. Clin. North Am. 22: 517-534.]. EPIDEP was scheduled in three phases: Phase 1 to recruit DSM-IV major depressives; Phase 2 to assess hypomania and affective temperaments; and Phase 3 to obtain history on course of illness, family history, and comorbidity. Comparative analyses are presented between affective subgroups constructed on a hierarchical basis: spontaneous hypomania (BP-II), cyclothymic temperament (BP-II 1/2), antidepressant-associated hypomania (BP-III), hyperthymic temperament (BP-IV), versus "strict unipolar" (UP). We present data on 490 patients for whom we obtained full assessment during all three phases of the study, classified as BP-II 1/2 (N=164), II (N=61), III (N=28), IV (N=22), as well as UP (N=174) as the reference nonbipolar group. Systematic inter-group comparison among the soft spectrum showed significant differences along clinical, descriptive, course, pharmacologic response and familial affective disorder patterns, which confirm the heterogeneity of the soft bipolar spectrum, with special characteristics for each of the subgroups. In terms of external validation, familial bipolar loading characterized all soft bipolar subgroups except type IV. Data collection conducted in a practice setting, clinicians cannot be entirely held "blind" to all measures. This is an exploratory attempt, with many variables examined, to help characterize the clinical terrain of soft bipolarity. This is nonetheless the first systematic clinical attempt to validate the bipolar spectrum beyond mania (BP-I). BP-II 1/2, BP-III and BP-IV appeared distinct from BP-II and strict UP -- along most of the variables examined. BP-II 1/2 -- with early onset complex temperament structure, and high mood instability, rapid switching, irritable ("dark") hypomania and suicidality -- emerged as the most prevalent and severe expression of the bipolar spectrum, and accounting for 33% of all MDE. These results, which are of great public health relevance, testify to the cyclic nature of bipolarity in its softest expressions. The soft phenotypes are also of interest for genetic investigations of bipolar disorder.
    Journal of Affective Disorders 01/2007; 96(3):207-13. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2006.03.011 · 3.38 Impact Factor
Show more