Self-Determinaton Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being

Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
American Psychologist (Impact Factor: 6.87). 02/2000; 55(1):68-78. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Source: PubMed


Human beings can be proactive and engaged or, alternatively, passive and alienated, largely as a function of the social conditions in which they develop and function. Accordingly, research guided by self-determination theory has focused on the social-contextual conditions that facilitate versus forestall the natural processes of self-motivation and healthy psychological development. Specifically, factors have been examined that enhance versus undermine intrinsic motivation, self-regulation, and well-being. The findings have led to the postulate of three innate psychological needs--competence, autonomy, and relatedness--which when satisfied yield enhanced self-motivation and mental health and when thwarted lead to diminished motivation and well-being. Also considered is the significance of these psychological needs and processes within domains such as health care, education, work, sport, religion, and psychotherapy.

Download full-text


Available from: Richard M Ryan,
  • Source
    • "H3: Consumers' perceived control of mobile commerce services will be negatively related to impulse buying. The influence of self-efficacy on satisfaction varies depending on how well it satisfies the intrinsic needs of competence (Ryan & Deci, 2000). According to previous research, self-efficacy exerts positive effects on job satisfaction (e.g., Caprara et al., 2003; Smith et al., 2011). "

    07/2016; 10(1):15-32. DOI:10.4018/ijebr.2014010102
  • Source
    • "Nevertheless, our results may be explained by the work motivation literature (e.g., Latham 2007), in particular self-determination theory (Deci and Ryan 1985). In brief, selfdetermination theory states that extrinsically motivated behaviors—behaviors whose outcome is instrumentally valued, rather than being enjoyable in themselves—vary along a continuum defined by the degree to which the motivations, or intentions to act, emanate from the self (Ryan and Deci 2000). Although motivation is a broader concept than commitment (commitment reinforces motivation and embeds it), ''both have been described as energizing forces with implications for behavior,'' with regulatory processes ranging in terms of the relative strength, or salience, of external demand versus internal drive (Collier and Esteban 2007; Meyer et al. 2004, p. 994). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study investigates the social–psychological mechanisms leading individuals in organizations to engage in environmental citizenship behaviors, which entail keeping abreast of, and participating in, the environmental affairs of a company. Informed by the corporate greening and organizational behavior literature, we suggested that an employee’s level of involvement in the management of a company’s environmental impact was the overt manifestation of his or her discretionary sense of commitment to environmental concerns in the work context, and that such commitment developed through the interplay of individual, organizational, and supervisory factors. Our general findings support the idea that when environmental protection is valued and encouraged by the company and line managers, organization members are more likely to experience a volitional sense of attachment and responsibility to corporate environmental goals and values, which is enacted through citizenship behaviors. We also expected that individual ecological beliefs would strengthen the environmental commitment of employees via identification with, and adherence to, the socially responsible cause embodied by the organization and its managerial staff. But it did not. On the contrary, the data indicated that corporate environmental policy is more likely to influence an employee’s level of environmental commitment when he or she holds weak versus strong personal ecological beliefs. Theoretical and managerial implications of our findings are discussed.
    Journal of Business Ethics 01/2016; DOI:10.1007/s10551-015-2548-x · 1.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "These theoretical lenses can be useful to generate predictions about the consequences of pursuing different success factors. For instance, firm performance and personal financial rewards could be seen to relate to extrinsic motivations while personal fulfilment, workplace relationships and community impact may relate to intrinsic motivations (personal growth and meaningful relationships with others), and for both motivations, different associations to performance and well-being have been documented in past research (Ryan and Deci, 2000). The success factors captured in SES-IS call for more multi-level theoretical approaches differentiating explicitly between the success of the firm and the entrepreneur (see Sarasvathy et al., 2013). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article conceptualises and operationalizes ‘subjective entrepreneurial success’ in a manner which reflects the criteria employed by entrepreneurs, rather than those imposed by researchers. Using two studies, a first qualitative enquiry investigated success definitions using interviews with 185 German entrepreneurs; five factors emerged from their reports: firm performance, workplace relationships, personal fulfilment, community impact, and personal financial rewards. The second study developed a questionnaire, the Subjective Entrepreneurial Success–Importance Scale (SES-IS), to measure these five factors using a sample of 184 entrepreneurs. We provide evidence for the validity of the SES-IS, including establishing systematic relationships of SES-IS with objective indicators of firm success, annual income and entrepreneur satisfaction with life and financial situation. We also provide evidence for the cross-cultural invariance of SES-IS using a sample of Polish entrepreneurs. The quintessence of our studies being that subjective entrepreneurial success is a multi-factorial construct, i.e. entrepreneurs value various indicators of success with money as only one possible option.
    International Small Business Journal 01/2016; in press. DOI:10.1177/0266242615608469 · 1.80 Impact Factor
Show more