Standardization of the TRUE Test imidazolidinyl urea and diazolidinyl urea patches.

Department of Dermatology, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.
Contact Dermatitis (Impact Factor: 2.93). 08/2001; 45(1):21-5. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.045001021.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The preservatives imidazolidinyl urea (IMID, Germall 115) and diazolidinyl urea (DU, Germall II) are commonly used in cosmetic products and are well-known sensitizers. The aim of the present study was to establish the optimal patch test concentration in hydrophilic dried-in vehicle (TRUE Test) for IMID and DU. 181 patients were included in the study. Of these, 150 were patients referred for patch testing, 12 were patients with known allergy to IMID and 19 were patients with known allergy to DU. 76 consecutive patients and the 12 IMID-allergic patients were patch tested with a dilution series IMID (0 to 600 microg/cm(2)), formaldehyde (180 microg/cm(2)) and DU (200 microg/cm(2)). 74 consecutive patients and the 19 DU-allergic patients were patch tested with a dilution series of DU (0 to 600 microg/cm(2)), formaldehyde (180 microg/cm) and IMID (200 microg/cm(2)). A positive dose-response relationship was found. The number of doubtful reactions decreased with increasing test concentrations. No late reactions were observed. A patch test concentration in hydrophilic dried-in vehicle (TRUE Test) of 600 microg/cm(2) was found to be adequate and safe for both IMID and DU.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Contact dermatitis is a highly frequent disease with a significant impact on the quality of life of the affected patients and a relevant socioeconomic impact. According to the pathophysiological mechanisms involved, two major types of contact dermatitis may be recognized: irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). The two types may, and often do, coexist. Differentiating between ICD and ACD is often difficult in the clinical setting. The basis for a diagnosis of either ICD or ACD is mainly established by a comprehensive clinical history and physical examination, as well as by performing appropriate diagnostic patch testing. The only useful and reliable method for the diagnosis of ACD remains the patch test. Positive patch test results, the current and/or past relevance of which has to be assessed, are confirmative of contact sensitization. Additional tests, such as the repeated open application test or the provocative use test, are sometimes necessary to confirm a causal relationship. This algorithmic diagnostic approach will allow the adoption of rational measures of allergen or irritant avoidance and the implementation of realistic patient information and education.
    Expert Review of Clinical Immunology 03/2010; 6(2):291-310. · 2.89 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For several decades, the cosmetic preservatives imidazolidinyl urea (IU) and diazolidinyl urea (DU) have not only been poorly characterized but have also had misleading chemical structures assigned to them. The most common trade names of IU and DU are Germall 115 and Germall II, respectively. This publication gives an insight into what these 2 well-known contact allergens consist of and their degradation patterns. Approximately, 30-40% of both products can be characterized by mixtures of allantoin (synthetic starting material), (4-hydroxymethyl-2,5-dioxo-imidazolidin-4-yl)-urea (compound HU) and presumably 1-(3,4-bis-hydroxymethyl-2,5-dioxo-imidazolidin-4-yl)-1,3-bis-hydroxymethyl-urea (compound BHU). A full chemical characterization of compound HU is shown. The remaining part of both IU and DU are believed to be polymers of allantoin-formaldehyde condensation products. The analytical methods used to characterize IU and DU are capillary electrophoresis and nuclear magnetic resonance and mass spectroscopy studies.
    Contact Dermatitis 02/2006; 54(1):50-8. · 2.93 Impact Factor
  • Contact Dermatitis 04/2008; 58(3):175-7. · 2.93 Impact Factor


Available from
May 16, 2014