Article

Diagnostic errors in an accident and emergency department

Accident and Emergency Department, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth PL6 8DH, UK.
Emergency Medicine Journal (Impact Factor: 1.78). 07/2001; 18(4):263-9. DOI: 10.1136/emj.18.4.263
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To describe the diagnostic errors occurring in a busy district general hospital accident and emergency (A&E) department over four years.
All diagnostic errors discovered by or notified to one A&E consultant were noted on a computerised database.
953 diagnostic errors were noted in 934 patients. Altogether 79.7% were missed fractures. The most common reasons for error were misreading radiographs (77.8%) and failure to perform radiography (13.4%). The majority of errors were made by SHOs. Twenty two diagnostic errors resulted in complaints and legal actions and three patients who had a diagnostic error made, later died.
Good clinical skills are essential. Most abnormalities missed on radiograph were not difficult to diagnose. Junior doctors in A&E should receive specific training and be tested on their ability to interpret radiographs correctly before being allowed to work unsupervised.

0 Followers
 · 
168 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: RESUMEN Objetivo: El síndrome del Victim of Modern Imaging Te-chnology (VOMIT) en los pa-cientes traumatizados es una entidad recientemente descri-ta, consecuencia del uso de los avances en la tecnología médica. Material y métodos: Bús-queda bibliográfica y en la red electrónica de información refe-rente al síndrome del VOMIT.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To evaluate agreement between conventional radiography and inverted digitized imaging in detecting maxillofacial fractures Material and Methods: A total of twenty orthopantomograms and fifteen paranasal sinus (PNS) radiographs with evidence of undisplaced maxillofacial fracture were collected from the archives of maxillofacial radiology. High quality radiographs with maximum sharpness, ideal contrast, and density were only included. Digitization was done by a consumer grade digital camera. Brightness and contrast adjustment, as well as image inversion was done with the help of software (Adobe photo shop 7.0). The presence of a radiolucent line that depicted fracture line was classified according to a 4 point confidence scale. Both conventional radiographs as well as inverted digitized images were evaluated by 3 calibrated examiners twice with an interval of 10 days. Intra examiner agreement was calculated by kappa statistics by point (k) and by 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: The results showed fair intra examiner agreement in most of the instances for the detection of maxillofacial fractures. Conclusion: In conclusion, the diagnostic agreement of conventional radiographs and inverted digitized panoramic and PNS images for the detection of maxillofacial fractures were low.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Resumen El incremento de la tecnología se ha extendido en todas las áreas de la medi-cina, un cambio con relación al diagnóstico ha ocurrido también en los estu-dios de imagen. El síndrome de VOMIT significa "Víctima de la tecnología de imagen médica" (Victim of Modern Imaging Technology) y es un término utiliza-do para describir colectivamente los pronósticos adversos que tiene el diag-nóstico, tratamiento o pronóstico del paciente politraumatizado debido a la mala aplicación o interpretación de estudios de imagen. A corto plazo, proba-blemente las estrategias de enseñanza abreviadas y las guías prácticas sol-venten en cierto grado la falta de eficacia para interpretar correctamente los estudios de imagen. Consideramos que a largo plazo, la formación profesional del médico, asociada con un entrenamiento basado en los principios de co-rrección de los inductores del error de percepción, probablemente represente la mejor estrategia para disminuir la aparición de nuevos casos del síndrome de VOMIT.

Preview

Download
3 Downloads
Available from