Article

Diagnostic errors in an accident and emergency department.

Accident and Emergency Department, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth PL6 8DH, UK.
Emergency Medicine Journal (Impact Factor: 1.78). 07/2001; 18(4):263-9. DOI: 10.1136/emj.18.4.263
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To describe the diagnostic errors occurring in a busy district general hospital accident and emergency (A&E) department over four years.
All diagnostic errors discovered by or notified to one A&E consultant were noted on a computerised database.
953 diagnostic errors were noted in 934 patients. Altogether 79.7% were missed fractures. The most common reasons for error were misreading radiographs (77.8%) and failure to perform radiography (13.4%). The majority of errors were made by SHOs. Twenty two diagnostic errors resulted in complaints and legal actions and three patients who had a diagnostic error made, later died.
Good clinical skills are essential. Most abnormalities missed on radiograph were not difficult to diagnose. Junior doctors in A&E should receive specific training and be tested on their ability to interpret radiographs correctly before being allowed to work unsupervised.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
159 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It has been shown that radiographers have a lot to offer the patient by providing their expert opinion in a timely intervention; including the possibility of Radiographer Led Discharge. Some excellent paper based ‘commenting’ systems have been developed locally and the Society and College of Radiographers has issued national guidance with a pro-forma to support implementation. However, delivery and audit of the PCE service can be burdensome. There is also an ongoing training need linked in to annual reviews. This paper provides a brief introduction to the field of controlled vocabularies and ontologies in radiology and serves to identify their potential for PCE systems. The current work has constructed a prototype taxonomy and accompanying ontology (list of relationships) that enable the generation of radiographer comments using an electronic, fast, and structured web based interface. For example, in the current implementation any one of thousands of possible unique comments could be constructed by making just six selections from filtered lists of terms. The prototype taxonomy has been tested to refine and validate the concept. The resulting taxonomy and its evolution is described here. Finally, the taxonomy was trialled by 23 participants who generated structured PCE's after reviewing 27 cases on DICOM workstations. An analysis of agreement between participants and the ‘gold standard’ is presented. In conclusion, a taxonomy has been created that would provide for: a standardised framework for training staff and students, efficient and robust delivery of the service, and audit of individual practice.
    Radiography 07/2014; 21(1).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Computed tomography (CT) can detect subtle organ injury and is applicable to many body regions. However, its interpretation requires significant skill. In our hospital, emergency physicians (EPs) must interpret emergency CT scans and formulate a plan for managing most trauma cases. CT misinterpretation should be avoided, but we were initially unable to completely accomplish this. In this study, we proposed and implemented a precautionary rule for our EPs to prevent misinterpretation of CT scans in blunt trauma cases.
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery 06/2014; 9:40. · 1.06 Impact Factor
    This article is viewable in ResearchGate's enriched format
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: RESUMEN Objetivo: El síndrome del Victim of Modern Imaging Te-chnology (VOMIT) en los pa-cientes traumatizados es una entidad recientemente descri-ta, consecuencia del uso de los avances en la tecnología médica. Material y métodos: Bús-queda bibliográfica y en la red electrónica de información refe-rente al síndrome del VOMIT.

Preview

Download
3 Downloads
Available from