Understanding and optimizing laparoscopic videosystems.

Department of General Surgery/A80, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Surgical Endoscopy (Impact Factor: 3.31). 09/2001; 15(8):781-7. DOI: 10.1007/s004640000391
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT As tactile feedback and degree of freedom for instrument movement are restricted in laparoscopic surgery, the video image plays the most crucial role in giving the surgeon information about the performance of the operation. The development of small, reliable, high-resolution imaging systems is essential for the surgeon's acquisition detailed information about the tissues being manipulated. Image quality depends on each component of the laparoscopic imaging unit. In this context, it is crucial for the surgeon to have an understanding of how the video signal is formed, transmitted, and displayed. Moreover, the surgeon also needs to have an idea about the basic principles and specifications of the surgical video systems (i.e. charge-coupled device (CCD) camera, monitors, and digitizers). This knowledge is essential for choosing pieces of equipment and knowing how to assemble them into a functional operating suite. The aim of this review is to provide the surgeon with the basics of video signaling, and to familiarize him or her with the technical principles of the surgical video systems. An insight into the future of laparoscopic video systems also is made, and practical tips for improving image quality and troubleshooting are given throughout the article.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Newer endoscopic techniques are being described at an increasing rate. It is important for surgeons to remain active in endoscopy and to participate in the development and evaluation of newer techniques. Newer diagnostic options include chromoscopy, which uses dyes; narrow band imaging and magnification endoscopy to assist in identifying lesions and guide biopsy or therapy; and colonic marking with tattoos or clipping. Colonic marking techniques are used frequently in current practice, whereas the other diagnostic options are mainly research tools. Therapeutic options include dilatation and colonic stents, advanced polypectomy techniques, lasers, and control of bleeding. With appropriate patient selection, these options are being offered with increased frequency. Since its inception, laparoscopic colon surgery has been limited by a significant learning-curve and issues as well as early concerns over port site metastases and the adequacy of oncologic resection. Recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of this approach for both benign and malignant colonic pathologies. Good evidence also exists to support several short-term postoperative benefits in laparoscopic resection compared with traditional laparotomy. Given the steep learning curve associated with laparoscopic colon surgery technologies have been developed to assist surgeons in performing these procedures safely, prudently, and effectively. Some of these include sleeveless hand-assist devices, hemostatic instruments such as the ultrasonic scalpel and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer, and improved laparoscopic camera systems, including "chip-on-a-stick," flexible, and three-dimensional laparoscopes.
    Surgical Clinics of North America 09/2006; 86(4):867-97. DOI:10.1016/j.suc.2006.05.006 · 1.93 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is a need for a device that can be used to objectively evaluate the image quality provided by laparoscopic camera units in the operating room. The device that we developed consists of a regular 10-mm or 5-mm laparoscopic port with a rectangular test unit built at the end. A standard test pattern slide with resolution bars is used for measurements. Using this assembly, a single-chip laparoscopic camera was compared with a three-chip laparoscopic camera at different wiring formats and camera settings by measuring the resolution on the monitor screen. Vertical resolution was found to be constant at 550 lines, regardless of the type of camera and wiring used. Of the three wiring formats, composite wiring provided the poorest image with both cameras. When enhancement was off, the horizontal resolution obtained with Y/C or RGB wiring was the same for the one-chip camera at 640 lines of horizontal resolution, whereas RGB cabling provided the best image for the three-chip camera at 800 lines. Using basic broadcasting principles, we have developed a simple device that is useful for the comparison of different camera, cabling, and laparoscope configurations in the operating room. This information can be used as objective criteria to judge the image quality in laparoscopic video- systems.
    Surgical Endoscopy 08/2002; 16(7):1111-3; discussion 1114. DOI:10.1007/s004640080176 · 3.31 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Surgical Endoscopy 10/2002; 16(9):1376. DOI:10.1007/s00464-001-8269-5 · 3.31 Impact Factor


Available from