Article

Infections associated with steroid use.

State University of New York School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Infectious Disease Clinics of North America (Impact Factor: 2.31). 07/2001; 15(2):423-32, viii. DOI: 10.1016/S0891-5520(05)70154-9
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Patients receiving chronic steroids have an increased susceptibility to many different types of infections. The risk of infection is related to the dose of steroid and the duration of therapy. Although pyogenic bacteria are the most common pathogens, chronic steroid use increases the risk of infection with intracellular pathogens such as Listeria, many fungi, the herpes viruses, and certain parasites. Clinicians should consider both common and unusual opportunistic infections in patients receiving chronic steroids.

8 Followers
 · 
1,021 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose Weekly or tri-weekly docetaxel treatment mandates the use of dexamethasone to prevent toxicity. However, the adverse effects of prophylactic steroid use are often overlooked. We investigated the incidence of corticosteroid-associated adverse effects during docetaxel therapy, focusing on hyperglycemia and infection as well as the identification of possible risk factors. Methods This study was conducted through retrospective chart review of 632 patients who started docetaxel-based chemotherapy between July 2011 and June 2012 at Seoul National University Hospital. Hyperglycemia was defined as more than two random glucose levels >200 mg/dL. All documented episodes of infection that required treatment with antibiotics were regarded as infectious episodes. Results The incidences of hyperglycemia in overall patients and in patients without previous diabetes mellitus were 13.7 and 10.9 %, respectively. Infectious episodes greater than grade 2 and grade 3 developed in 29.6 and 19.9 % of patients, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that body mass index and previous diabetes mellitus were independent risk factors for hyperglycemia, whereas corticosteroid dose was not. Treatment duration and frequency of high blood glucose levels over 200 mg/dL were independent risk factors for infection. Conclusions Due to the significant difference in patient and treatment characteristics, we could not obtain meaningful comparisons between weekly and tri-weekly docetaxel administration regimens. This study suggests that adverse effects associated with prophylactic steroid use need to be recognized and optimally managed during docetaxel therapy.
    Supportive Care Cancer 12/2014; DOI:10.1007/s00520-014-2547-y · 2.50 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Irritant and allergic contact dermatitis are undesired side effects in the development of drugs and cosmetics as well as after contact with environmental or industrial chemicals. Over the last decades, a great deal of progress has been made in the development of alternative In vitro test to assess these issues. Driven by the 7th Amendment to the European Cosmetic Directive, the EU policy on chemicals (the registration, evaluation, authorization and restriction of chemicals (REACH) system), the update of the European legislation on the protection of animals used in research, and emerging visions and strategies for predicting toxicity, in vitro methods are likely to play a major role in the near future. On 12 December 2013, the European Union Reference Laboratory for Alternatives to Animal Testing (EURL ECVAM, part of the European Commission Joint Research Centre) published its Recommendation on the Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA) for skin sensitization, capable of distinguishing sensitizers from non-sensitizers. Other assays (i.e., KeratinoSens ™ assay) will follow shortly. While a number of methods are at various stages of development and use, currently it is not possible to rank chemicals for their sensitizing potency, an issue that is important for a full safety assessment. It is expected that a predictive method to totally replace animal testing will be in the form of a test battery comprising molecular, cell-based, and/or computational methods, the so-called " Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment ". This review aims to discuss the state-of-the-art in the field of In vitro assessment of contact sensitizers.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The interface of multiple sclerosis (MS) and infection occurs on several levels. First, infectious disease has been postulated as a potential trigger, if not cause, of MS. Second, exacerbation of MS has been well-documented as a consequence of infection, and, lastly, infectious diseases have been recognized as a complication of the therapies currently employed in the treatment of MS. MS is a disease in which immune dysregulation is a key component. Examination of central nervous system (CNS) tissue of people affected by MS demonstrates immune cell infiltration, activation and inflammation. Therapies that alter the immune response have demonstrated efficacy in reducing relapse rates and evidence of brain inflammation on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Despite the altered immune response in MS, there is a lack of evidence that these patients are at increased risk of infectious disease in the absence of treatment or debility. Links between infections and disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) used in MS will be discussed in this review, as well as estimates of occurrence and ways to potentially minimize these risks. We address infection in MS in a comprehensive fashion, including (1) the impact of infections on relapse rates in patients with MS; (2) a review of available infection data from pivotal trials and postmarketing studies for the approved and experimental DMTs, including frequency, types and severity of infections; and (3) relevant risk minimization strategies, particularly as they pertain to progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML).
    CNS Drugs 03/2015; DOI:10.1007/s40263-015-0226-2 · 4.38 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
58 Downloads
Available from