Article

Predictive factors for disability pension - An 11-year follow up of young persons on sick leave due to neck, shoulder, or back diagnoses

Division of Social Medicine and Public Health Science, Department of Health and Environment, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping, Sweden.
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 3.13). 07/2001; 29(2):104-12. DOI: 10.1177/14034948010290020701
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although back diagnoses are recurrent and the main diagnoses behind sickness absence and disability pension surprisingly few longitudinal studies have been performed. This study identifies predictive factors for disability pension among young persons initially sick-listed with back diagnoses.
An 11-year prospective cohort study was conducted, including all individuals in a Swedish city who, in 1985, were aged 25-34 and sick-listed > or =28 days owing to neck, shoulder, or back diagnoses (n = 213). The following data was obtained: disability pension, emigration, and death for 1985-96, sickness absence for 1982-84, and demographics in 1985 regarding sex, income, occupation, marital status, diagnosis, socioeconomic group, and citizenship. Cox regression and life tables were used in the analyses.
In 1996, i.e. within 11 years, 22% of the individuals (27% of the women and 14% of the men) had been granted disability pension. The relative risk for disability pension was higher for women (2.4; p = 0.010), persons with foreign citizenship (3.6; p=0.009), and those who had had >14 sick-leave days per spell during the three years before inclusion, compared to those with <7 days/spell (3.1; p=0.003).
This cohort of young persons proved to be a high-risk group for disability pension. Some of the factors known to predict long-time sickness absence also predict disability pension in a cohort of already sick-listed persons.

1 Follower
 · 
49 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: To explore the experiences of today's patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with respect to dilemmas of everyday life, especially regarding patterns of participation restrictions in valued life activities. Methods: A total of 48 patients, aged 20–63, three years post-RA diagnosis were interviewed using the Critical Incident Technique. Transcribed interviews were condensed into meaningful units describing actions/situations. These descriptions were linked to ICF participation codes according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) linking rules. Results: Dilemmas in everyday life were experienced in domestic life, interpersonal interactions and relationships, community, social and civic life. Most dilemmas were experienced in domestic life, including participation restrictions in, e.g. gardening, repairing houses, shovelling snow, watering pot plants, sewing or walking the dog. Also many dilemmas were experienced related to recreation and leisure within the domain community, social and civic life. The different dilemmas were often related to each other. For instance, dilemmas related to community life were combined with dilemmas within mobility, such as lifting and carrying objects. Conclusions: Participation restrictions in today’s RA patients are complex. Our results underline that the health care needs to be aware of the patients’ own preferences and goals to support the early multi-professional interventions in clinical practice.Implications of Rehabilitation Today’s rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients experience participation restrictions in activities not included in International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) core set for RA or in traditionally questionnaires with predefined activities.The health care need to be aware of the patients’ own preferences and goals to meet the individual needs and optimize the rehabilitation in early RA in clinical practice.
    Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 09/2014; DOI:10.3109/09638288.2014.961658 · 9.27 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Although coronary revascularization by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is well documented, scientific knowledge on disability pension (DP) at time of revascularization is sparse. The aim was to investigate the prevalence of all-cause and diagnosis-specific DP at time of a first coronary revascularization, accounting for sociodemographic and medical factors. Methods A population-based, cross-sectional study, using Swedish registers, was conducted including all 65,676 patients (80% men) who, when aged 30-63 years, within 1994-2006, had a first CABG (n = 22,959) or PCI (n = 42,717) and did not have 314
    7th European Public Health Conference, Glasgow, United Kingdom; 11/2014
  • Source