Article

Making sense of refractive surgery in 2001: why, when, for whom, and by whom?

Department of Ophthalmology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, USA.
Mayo Clinic Proceedings (Impact Factor: 5.79). 09/2001; 76(8):823-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)63227-8
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Surgical alteration of the focusing or refractive properties of the eye has been performed on millions of patients. An array of procedures to correct myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, and presbyopia have been introduced over the past 25 years with varying degrees of success. Improved technology has increased patient and physician satisfaction and enthusiasm. Currently available surgical procedures can be categorized as incisional, surface-altering, lamellar, and intraocular. The choice of procedure depends on individual patient indications and contraindications based on results of ocular examinations, eg, corneal pachymetry to measure corneal thickness, keratometry to measure the corneal curvature, basal tear secretory rate, and dark-adapted pupil size. The postoperative uncorrected visual acuity depends, in large part, on the quality of the preoperative evaluation and refraction. Before scheduling a patient for surgery, the ophthalmologist must ensure that the patient understands the potential risks of the procedure and has realistic expectations for the postoperative level and quality of uncorrected visual acuity. Postoperative complications include corneal flap displacement, undercorrection and overcorrection, and epithelial ingrowth under the corneal flap and inflammatory keratitis. Postoperative dry eye, infection, and inflammation are usually treated medically. Ongoing technological innovations to customize the surgical approach to an individual patient's eye continue to improve outcomes.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
63 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To identify differentially expressed genes in healing mouse corneas by using cDNA microarrays. Transepithelial excimer laser ablations were performed on mouse corneas, and the wounds were allowed to heal partially in vivo for 18 to 22 hours. Total RNA was isolated from both normal and healing corneas and was used for synthesis of cDNA probes. 33P-labeled exponential cDNA probes were hybridized to mouse cDNA nylon arrays. Of the 1176 genes on the nylon arrays, the expression of 37 was upregulated and that of 27 was downregulated more than fivefold in the healing corneas compared with the normal, uninjured corneas. Interleukin (IL)-1beta, laminin-5, and thrombospondin-1, which have been shown to be upregulated in healing corneas, were all found to be induced in the corneas in response to excimer laser treatment. Many genes were identified for the first time to be differentially regulated during corneal wound healing. Among the upregulated genes were intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, macrophage inflammatory proteins, suppressors of cytokine signaling proteins (SOCS), IL-10 receptor, and galectin-7. Among the downregulated genes were connexin-31, a gap junction protein; ZO1 and occludin, tight junction proteins; and Smad2, a key component in the TGFbeta signaling pathway. Microarray data were validated on a limited number of genes by semiquantitative RT-PCR and Western blot analyses. Gene array technology was used to identify for the first time many genes that are differentially regulated during corneal wound healing. These differentially expressed genes have not previously been investigated in the context of wound healing and represent novel factors for further study of the mechanism of wound healing.
    Investigative Ophthalmology &amp Visual Science 10/2002; 43(9):2897-904. · 3.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) is a relatively uncommon complication of the refractive procedure, laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). If detected and diagnosed in a timely fashion, it can be treated and should resolve with minimal sequelae. If untreated, or misdiagnosed and treated incorrectly, there may be loss of visual acuity. Optometrists should be familiar with this condition, its signs, symptoms and correct treatment protocol. A 58-year-old male Caucasian developed delayed onset diffuse lamellar keratitis, seemingly in the absence of an epithelial defect, 25 days following an enhancement LASIK procedure to his right eye. The DLK in this patient is delayed longer than typically reported in the literature. Subsequent management with topical steroids was complicated as the patient was a steroid responder and developed a markedly raised intraocular pressure that was managed with a topical anti-glaucoma agent. The diagnosis, pathogenesis and issues relevant to the treatment of this condition are discussed. Optometrists, particularly those actively participating in the shared care of refractive surgery patients, must be familiar with diffuse lamellar keratitis so that diagnosis is not delayed. As the number of cases of refractive surgery in Australia increases, optometrists will encounter this condition more frequently.
    Clinical and Experimental Optometry 04/2004; 87(2):102-6. · 0.92 Impact Factor
  • The Journal of Surgery. 01/2004; 2(1):34-37.

Full-text

View
1 Download