Article

Making sense of refractive surgery in 2001: why, when, for whom, and by whom?

Department of Ophthalmology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, USA.
Mayo Clinic Proceedings (Impact Factor: 5.79). 09/2001; 76(8):823-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)63227-8
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Surgical alteration of the focusing or refractive properties of the eye has been performed on millions of patients. An array of procedures to correct myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, and presbyopia have been introduced over the past 25 years with varying degrees of success. Improved technology has increased patient and physician satisfaction and enthusiasm. Currently available surgical procedures can be categorized as incisional, surface-altering, lamellar, and intraocular. The choice of procedure depends on individual patient indications and contraindications based on results of ocular examinations, eg, corneal pachymetry to measure corneal thickness, keratometry to measure the corneal curvature, basal tear secretory rate, and dark-adapted pupil size. The postoperative uncorrected visual acuity depends, in large part, on the quality of the preoperative evaluation and refraction. Before scheduling a patient for surgery, the ophthalmologist must ensure that the patient understands the potential risks of the procedure and has realistic expectations for the postoperative level and quality of uncorrected visual acuity. Postoperative complications include corneal flap displacement, undercorrection and overcorrection, and epithelial ingrowth under the corneal flap and inflammatory keratitis. Postoperative dry eye, infection, and inflammation are usually treated medically. Ongoing technological innovations to customize the surgical approach to an individual patient's eye continue to improve outcomes.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
61 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the prevalence of different topographic patterns in refractive surgery candidates and to estimate the extent of candidate rejection based on topography alone. We performed a retrospective evaluation of videokeratographies of previously unoperated refractive surgery candidates. The defined topographic patterns of their corneas and the indices computed by the videokeratographer software were registered. The data were evaluated by SPSS/PC statistical software. One hundred candidate electronic topography records were evaluated. The candidates included 41 women and 59 men whose average age was 32 years (range 17.5-63.5). Their topographic patterns were: spherical (36/200 evaluated eyes), spherocylindrical (60), upper steep (32), lower steep (43), irregular astigmatism (9), decentered (3), suspected keratoconus (11), and probable keratoconus (6 eyes). Rejection from undergoing the procedure was based on topography alone in 27 of the 200 eyes. It was difficult to decide what to do with the 43 eyes with a lower steep pattern, and they were eventually rejected. Of the nine software-calculated indices, only one, "keratoconus index," could distinguish between the spherocylindrical and the lower steep patterns. More than one-half of corneal topographies of refractive surgery candidates did not comply with the assumed "normal" spherical or spherocylindrical patterns. The possible continuum of keratoconus-suspected keratoconus-lower steep pattern raises the question of where to draw the line between reasonable and risky when considering corneal refractive surgery.
    Cornea 09/2004; 23(6):602-7. · 1.75 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) is a relatively uncommon complication of the refractive procedure, laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). If detected and diagnosed in a timely fashion, it can be treated and should resolve with minimal sequelae. If untreated, or misdiagnosed and treated incorrectly, there may be loss of visual acuity. Optometrists should be familiar with this condition, its signs, symptoms and correct treatment protocol. A 58-year-old male Caucasian developed delayed onset diffuse lamellar keratitis, seemingly in the absence of an epithelial defect, 25 days following an enhancement LASIK procedure to his right eye. The DLK in this patient is delayed longer than typically reported in the literature. Subsequent management with topical steroids was complicated as the patient was a steroid responder and developed a markedly raised intraocular pressure that was managed with a topical anti-glaucoma agent. The diagnosis, pathogenesis and issues relevant to the treatment of this condition are discussed. Optometrists, particularly those actively participating in the shared care of refractive surgery patients, must be familiar with diffuse lamellar keratitis so that diagnosis is not delayed. As the number of cases of refractive surgery in Australia increases, optometrists will encounter this condition more frequently.
    Clinical and Experimental Optometry 04/2004; 87(2):102-6. · 0.92 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the relationship between the achieved refractive change and the change in simulated keratometry (K) after myopic laser situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and compare this relationship between custom and conventional treatments. Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, and John A. Moran Eye Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. The change in simulated K and the refractive change induced by custom myopic LASIK and conventional LASIK were determined. The relationship between the variables was analyzed by regression methods. Custom treatment was performed in 106 eyes and conventional treatment in 224 eyes. Simple linear regression analysis did not fit the clinical observation when the refractive change was less than 2.00 diopters (D) of myopic correction with both treatments. Under the linear model and nonlinear model, each unit of refractive change yielded a greater change in corneal topographic power with custom treatment than with conventional treatment. With both treatments, the rate of change in simulated K was not constant and was much more variable with lower amounts of correction. The relationship was more constant and linear with larger amounts of refractive correction. The relationship between the measured change in simulated K and the induced refractive change better fit a nonlinear relationship with smaller amounts of refractive correction in custom LASIK and conventional LASIK. Under all forms of analysis, custom treatments yielded a greater per-unit change in corneal curvature than conventional treatments, especially for refractive corrections of 4.00 D and higher.
    Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 09/2010; 36(9):1550-5. · 2.75 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
1 Download