Immunogenicity of an E1-deleted recombinant human adenovirus against rabies by different routes of administration.

Impfstoffwerk Dessau-Tornau GmbH, PO Box 214, 06855 Rosslau, Germany.
Journal of General Virology (Impact Factor: 3.13). 10/2001; 82(Pt 9):2191-7.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The immunogenic properties of an E1-deleted, human adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) vaccine virus with activity against rabies were examined in mice, foxes and dogs using different routes of administration. NMRI mice received 10(5.8), 10(5.3), 10(4.3), 10(3.3) and 10(2.3) TCID(50) by peroral or intramuscular (i.m.) administration. Furthermore, six mice received 10(5.8) TCID(50) intracerebrally (i.c.). The construct elicited marked seroconversion in mice after oral administration. Immunoreactivity in mice was even more pronounced i.m. and i.c. After direct oral administration (10(8.0) TCID(50)) in foxes, six of eight animals developed rabies virus-neutralizing antibodies (VNA). All foxes immunized by direct injection (10(7.7) TCID(50)) in the membrane of the jejunum were shown to seroconvert. Pre-existing immunity against canine adenovirus did not hinder the development of rabies VNA after oral application of the construct (10(8.0) TCID(50)). Fox cubs (24-29 days old) born from rabies-immune vixens were shown to develop very high levels of rabies VNA after i.m. administration (10(8.0) TCID(50)), indicating that the immunogenicity of the construct could surpass maternally transferred immunity. In dogs, the construct (10(8.0) TCID(50)) induced a very strong immune response after i.m. administration. However, no immune response was detectable in dogs after direct oral administration (10(8.3) TCID(50)) or after endoscopic deposition in the smaller intestine (10(8.0) TCID(50)). Hence, it must be concluded that the construct is not suitable for oral vaccination of dogs against rabies.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Oral rabies virus (RV) vaccines are used to immunize a diversity of mammalian carnivores, but no single biological is effective for all major species. Recently, advances in reverse genetics have allowed the design of recombinant RV for consideration as new vaccines. The objective of this experiment was to examine the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of recombinant RV vaccines administered to captive dogs by the oral route, compared to a commercial vaccinia-rabies glycoprotein (V-RG) recombinant virus vaccine. Animals consisted of naive purpose-bred beagles of both sexes, and were 6 months of age or older. Dogs were randomly assigned to one of six groups, and received either diluent or vaccine (PBS; V-RG; RV SN10-333; RV SPBN-Cyto c; RV SPBNGA; RV SPBNGAGA), with at least six animals per group. On day 0, 1 ml of each vaccine (or PBS) was administered to the oral cavity of each dog, at an approximate concentration of 10(8) to 10(9) TCID50. After vaccination, dogs were observed daily and bled weekly, for 5 weeks, prior to RV challenge. No signs of illness related to vaccination were detected during the observation period. Excluding the controls, RV neutralizing antibodies were detected in the majority of animals within 1-2 weeks of primary vaccination. Thereafter, all dogs were inoculated in the masseter muscle with a street virus of canine origin. All control animals developed rabies, but no vaccinates succumbed, with the exception of a single dog in the V-RG group. Review of these preliminary data demonstrates the non-inferiority of recombinant RV products, as concerns both safety and efficacy, and supports the suggestion that these vaccines may hold promise for future development as oral immunogens for important carnivore species, such as dogs.
    Virus Research 08/2005; 111(1):101-5. · 2.75 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), which belongs to the family Flaviviridae, causes infection of the central nervous system in humans and equines and stillbirths in swine. In the present report, we constructed and characterized the immune responses conferred by recombinant adenoviruses expressing JEV E epitopes (six amino acid residues 60-68, 327-333, 337-345, 373-399, 397-403 and 436-445 in E, designated TEP). Seven groups (n = 10) of female BALB/c mice received intramuscular (IM) or oral immunization with the recombinant adenoviruses twice at 2-week intervals. Intramuscular immunization of mice with rAd-TEP generated greater titers of anti-JEV antibodies and JEV neutralizing activity than in animals with oral injection. It statistically significant differences were found in anti-JEV antibody titers and JEV neutralizing activity induced by IM immunization with rAd-TEP at a dose of 1 x 10(8.0)TCID50 when compared with the doses tested (3 x 10(7.0) and 1 x 10(7.0)TCID50) IM inoculation of rAd-TEP. Splenocytes from mice immunized intramuscularly with rAd-TEP secreted the largest amounts of interferon-gamma and interleukin-2 and moderate amounts of interleukin-4 in the presence of JEV. It demonstrates that IM immunization with rAd-TEP induced the highest level of cell-mediated immune responses and the higher level of JEV-specific humoral immune responses than oral immunization. Then we further evaluated the protective efficacy of the recombinants in swine. All swine were protected from viral challenge with IM rAd-TEP at 1 x 10(10.0)TCID50, even though the neutralizing antibody titers were lower than those in the group inoculated with inactivated vaccine. Our findings indicate that rAd-TEP might be an attractive candidate vaccines for preventing JEV infection.
    Vaccine 10/2008; 26(46):5802-7. · 3.49 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An Irkut virus (IRKV) was recently isolated from a bat in China. The protective ability of rabies biologics available in the Chinese market and experimental biologics were assessed in a hamster model against the rabies virus (RABV) and IRKV via pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) experiments. The results demonstrated that a single dose of rabies vaccine did not induce adequate protection against IRKV. However, routine PrEP with three doses of a vaccine induced complete protection against IRKV. Higher doses of rabies immune globulins and interferon α were required during PEP to protect hamsters against IRKV compared to RABV. Experimental recombinant vaccines containing IRKV glycoprotein induced more reliable protection against IRKV than against RABV. Those may be explained by limited cross-neutralization of these viruses (confirmed via in-vitro tests) in conjunction with antigenic distance between RABV and IRKV. These results indicate that development and evaluation of new biologics for PrEP and PEP are required to ensure sufficient protection against IRKV in China and other territories where this virus is present.
    Journal of clinical microbiology 08/2013; · 4.16 Impact Factor


Available from