Article

Eight year outcome after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a comparison of reoperated and not reoperated patients.

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital in Trondheim, Norway.
Acta Neurochirurgica (Impact Factor: 1.79). 01/2001; 143(6):607-610; discussion 610-11. DOI: 10.1007/s007010170066
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A retrospective study of 211 patients with unilateral sciatica operated on for lumbar disc herniation during 1988 and 1989 was performed in order to compare the results of reoperated patients with the results of patients operated on only once. The patients completed a standardized questionnaire in 1997 which included questions about reoperations, back and leg pain, functional status and disability pension. Outcome scores were calculated, giving values from 0 (no pain/normal function) to 100 (totally disabled). A follow-up status of 80.1% was obtained; 163 patients answered the questionnaire while six patients had died. 23.9% of the patients (n = 39) had been reoperated on. A recurrent disc herniation at the same level was suspected before the reoperation in 18.4%, but a recurrence was found in only 8.6%. 3.7% were reoperated on more than once. Outcome score was worse among "reoperated" patients (median 45.0, range 0-94) than among patients who only had the primary operation (median 10.5, range 0-81) (P < 0.001). In addition, 34.3% of the "reoperated" patients received a disability pension compared to 9.9% of the patients not reoperated on (P < 0.01). Patients reoperated upon at the same level without peroperative signs of recurrent disc herniation, had an outcome score of 53.0 (range 0-82) compared to a score of 30.0 (range 0-66) in patients with a confirmed recurrence (P < 0.05). The percentage of disability pension was 53.8% versus 9.1%, respectively, for those two groups (P < 0.05). Eight years after operation for lumbar disc herniation, the outcome was significantly worse in "reoperated" patients than in patients operated on once. In addition, reoperated patients with peroperatively confirmed recurrence of the same disc, seemed to have a better outcome than patients without peroperative signs of a recurrence.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
76 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Depuis la démonstration du lien entre hernie discale et sciatique, il était acquis que la compression radiculaire par une hernie discale était la cause de la sciatique, mais il est maintenant admis qu'à la composante mécanique s'associent des facteurs chimiques. Les arguments cliniques en faveur de la théorie « chimique » sont : les taux d'échecs de la chirurgie discale, l'existence de volumineuses hernies discales asymptomatiques, de radiculalgies sévères sans image de compression radiculaire, la corrélation médiocre entre la sévérité des symptômes et des signes neurologiques et la taille de la hernie discale, l'évolution souvent favorable après traitement conservateur. Les arguments expérimentaux plaident également en faveur de cette théorie : la capacité de résorption spontanée de la hernie discale, l'immunogénicité du disque intervertébral, la présence de médiateurs de l'inflammation au sein du disque. La théorie physiopathologique actuelle incrimine des substances pro-inflammatoires, secrétées par le nucleus pulposus (NP) qui, pour provoquer une radiculalgie, doivent être associées à une agression radiculaire mécanique préalable ou simultanée. Les expérimentations animales ont démontré que le NP pouvait, sans compression mécanique, induire des anomalies fonctionnelles et structurelles de la racine nerveuse, et que ces effets, plus ou moins inhibés par la méthylprednisolone, le diclofenac, l'indométhacine, la doxycycline et la cyclosporine, étaient générés par des substances situées à la surface des cellules du NP. À la lumière de ces données, il apparaît que le candidat expliquant le mieux ces phénomènes, est le tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), justifiant ainsi l'essai des anti-TNF-α chez l'homme.
    Revue du Rhumatisme 03/2006; 73(3):228-236. DOI:10.1016/j.rhum.2005.03.003
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Revision lumbar laminectomy surgery accounts for a significant number of surgical procedures each year. Increasing rates of revision surgery within the lumbar spine have been reported. The significance and etiologies of revision lumbar surgery are reviewed. Techniques in avoiding and dealing with epidural scar tissue are discussed. The relevant outcomes following revision laminectomy are reviewed. Strategies of avoiding revision surgery and associated complications are presented.
    Seminars in Spine Surgery 12/2008; 20(4):270-276. DOI:10.1053/j.semss.2008.08.005