Article

Semicircular canal-otolith organ interaction during off-vertical axis rotation in humans.

Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA 15213, USA.
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology (Impact Factor: 2.95). 04/2001; 2(1):22-30. DOI: 10.1007/s101620010012
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to examine the interaction of signals from the semicircular canals and the otolith organs during off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR). We recorded horizontal eye position using electro-oculography in 22 young normal human subjects and stimulated the vestibulo-ocular reflex with both constant velocity trapezoids and sinusoidal yaw rotations, using both earth-vertical axis rotation (EVAR) and OVAR. We found that per-rotatory long vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) time constants during velocity trapezoids were shorter for OVAR than for EVAR, suggesting a reduction in the efficacy of the velocity storage system during OVAR. However, when we tested with very-low-frequency sinusoids (0.01 Hz and below), the phase lead of the VOR re head velocity was smaller during OVAR than EVAR, suggesting a longer time constant and enhanced efficacy of velocity storage during OVAR. These rotational responses can be explained by two competing influences of signals from the otolith organs, one that diminishes the effectiveness of velocity storage and another that contributes to an estimate of head velocity.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
104 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the influence of somatosensory input on the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), we used sinusoidal rotation tests in 19 young, healthy volunteers. For the control condition, subjects were sinusoidally rotated in complete darkness and with eyes opened at a frequency of 0.2 Hz with a maximum angular velocity of 30°/s for 30 s, and at frequencies of 0.4 and 0.8 Hz with a maximum angular velocity of 60°/s for 30 s. Sinusoidal tests were performed at earth vertical axis rotation (EVAR). For the experimental condition, we introduced somatosensory stimulation as subjects were sinusoidally rotated at the control parameters. Subjects were told to grasp an earth-fixed metallic bar with their right hands. Thus, their right arms continued to move as the rotating chair apparatus moved. We observed a significant increment (34%) in VOR gain change only at 0.2 Hz EVAR when subjects held the bar compared to that of the controls, who did not hold the bar. Gain change did not differ significantly across the other conditions. We hypothesize that arthrokinetic input (i.e., arm movement) had an additive effect on VOR in this study. This input might relate to a low-frequency component that strongly enhances the velocity storage system. Our findings have applications to types of vestibular rehabilitation regimens that implement somatosensory input.
    Neuroscience Letters 01/2009; · 2.03 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Researching on the vestibular-sympathetic reflex mechanism requires as an intermediary step to establish a lumped model for the Vestibular Receptors. Knowing that Otolith Organs and Semicircular Canals are sensing changes in the head velocity on 6 degrees of freedom, the purpose of this paper is to set up models for both types of receptors, branching them into Regular and Irregular subcategories, and to consider a certain convergence of their outputs. The developed model for the Vestibular Receptors is tested in the sit to stand orthostatic stress scenario. Keywordsvestibular-sympathetic reflex–vestibular receptors–otolith organs–semicircular canals–fractional order systems
    12/2010: pages 260-265;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: On April 28, 2001, Championship Auto Racing Teams (CART) drivers reported experiences of disorientation, dizziness, nausea and blurred vision during practice trials on the Texas Motor Speedway (TMS). Following the practice trials, there were reports of postural imbalance. As a result, the Firestone Firehawk 600 race scheduled for Sunday April 29 was cancelled,; the first time in auto racing history that concerns about driver intolerance to G forces caused a cancellation. The four drivers who did not experience problems had completed less than 20 laps (drive time of 8 min) whereas those reporting symptoms had driven on the track for more than 8 min. Using track data (maximum average speed in qualifying laps, radius of turns, bank angle of turns), we have calculated the magnitudes of "gravito-inertial forces" experienced by drivers on a number of speedways in the US. This reveals that drivers experience high G, particularly lateral G (Gy) on most speedways. Other tracks, eg., Dover Motor Speedway, also have steep banks and relatively small-radius turns, but have been raced at lower speeds. Some have banked turns that are steeper than the TMS turns. Calculated G-loads were greatest on the TMS, due to 220-250 mph car speeds. However, considering the semi- reclining posture of drivers, Gz on turns was not in a range that would be expected to produce G induced loss of consciousness (G LOC).
    01/2003;

Full-text

Download
0 Downloads
Available from