Depressive disorders in Europe: prevalence figures from the ODIN study. Br J Psychiatry

University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, University of Cantabria, Avd Valdecilla s/n, Santander 39008, Spain.
The British Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 7.34). 11/2001; 179:308-16. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.179.4.308
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This is the first report on the epidemiology of depressive disorders from the European Outcome of Depression International Network (ODIN) study.
To assess the prevalence of depressive disorders in randomly selected samples of the general population in five European countries.
The study was designed as a cross-sectional two-phase community study using the Beck Depression inventory during Phase 1, and the Schedule for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry during Phase 2.
An analysis of the combined sample (n=8.764) gave an overall prevalence of depressive disorders of 8.56% (95% CI 7.05-10.37). The figures were 10.05% (95% CI 7.80-12.85) for women and 6.61% (95% CI 4.92-8.83) for men. The centres fall into three categories: high prevalence (urban Ireland and urban UK), low prevalence (urban Spain) and medium prevalence (the remaining sites).
Depressive disorder is a highly prevalent condition in Europe. The major finding is the wide difference in the prevalence of depressive disorders found across the study sites.

Download full-text


Available from: Patricia Casey, Jun 06, 2015
  • Source
    • "Rook and Lowry admit that the data from these latter studies is " fraught with problems in interpretation " (Rook & Lowry, 2008, p. 153). For example, an examination of the studies they cite (Ayuso-Mateos et al., 2001; Chisholm et al., 2004) reveals that while there has been some success at unifying diagnostic criteria across populations, problems in estimating prevalence and incidence across cultures remain and are well acknowledged (see Horwitz & Wakefield, 2007 on problems comparing, for example, the diagnostic criteria of the DSM and the ICD). However, despite the problems in cross-cultural comparisons of this sort, what remains robust is the finding that no matter what population is being sampled, within that population, more women than men satisfy criteria for depression, and this is particularly the case in countries of the industrialized North and West. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The hygiene hypothesis offers an explanation for the correlation, well-established in the industrialized nations of North and West, between increased hygiene and sanitation, and increased rates of asthma and allergies. Recent studies have added to the scope of the hypothesis, showing a link between decreased exposure to certain bacteria and parasitic worms, and increased rates of depression and intestinal auto-immune disorders, respectively. What remains less often discussed in the research on these links is that women have higher rates than men of asthma and allergies, as well as many auto-immune disorders, and also depression. The current paper introduces a feminist understanding of gender socialization to the epidemiological and immunological picture. That standards of cleanliness are generally higher for girls than boys, especially under the age of five when children are more likely to be under close adult supervision, is a robust phenomenon in industrialized nations, and some research points to a cross-cultural pattern. I conclude that, insofar as the hygiene hypothesis successfully identifies standards of hygiene and sanitation as mediators of immune health, then attention to the relevant patterns of gender socialization is important. The review also makes clear that adding a feminist analysis of gender socialization to the hygiene hypothesis helps explain variation in morbidity rates not addressed by other sources and responds to a number of outstanding puzzles in current research. Alternative explanations for the sex differences in the relevant morbidity rates are also discussed (e.g., the effects of estrogens). Finally, new sources of evidence for the hygiene hypothesis are suggested in the form of cross-cultural and other natural experiments.
    Social Science [?] Medicine 02/2011; 72(4):486-93. DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.021 · 2.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Other studies are limited to samples of students (Fischer & Manstead, 2000) or couples aged 50 and older (Börsch-Supan et al., 2005). Some are based on patient samples only (Angst et al., 2002; Ayuso-Mateos et al., 2001; Maier et al., 1999) or contain only a small set of countries (Alonso et al., 2004). In these studies, it is not the number of countries involved that hampers the usefulness of these data so much as it is that they are convenience samples, which hinders the generalizability of the findings. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: One of the most consistent findings in the social epidemiology of mental health is the gender gap in depression. Depression is approximately twice as prevalent among women as it is among men. However, the absence of comparable data hampers cross-national comparisons of the prevalence of depression in general populations. Using information about the frequency and severity of depressive symptoms from the third wave of the European Social Survey (ESS-3), we are able to fill the gap the absence of comparable data leaves. In the ESS-3, depression is measured with an eight-item version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale. In the current study, we examine depression among men and women aged 18-75 in 23 European countries. Our results indicate that women report higher levels of depression than men do in all countries, but there is significant cross-national variation in this gender gap. Gender differences in depression are largest in some of the Eastern and Southern European countries and smallest in Ireland, Slovakia and some Nordic countries. Hierarchical linear models show that socioeconomic as well as family-related factors moderate the relationship between gender and depression. Lower risk of depression is associated in both genders with marriage and cohabiting with a partner as well as with having a generally good socioeconomic position. In a majority of countries, socioeconomic factors have the strongest association with depression in both men and women. This research contributes new findings, expanding the small existing body of literature that presents highly comparable data on the prevalence of depression in women and men in Europe.
    Social Science [?] Medicine 07/2010; 71(2):305-13. DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.035 · 2.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "symptoms on assessment of personality disorder, it would be useful (in a differently designed study) to assess personality disorder prior to both depression occurring and treatment for depression being offered [24]. In terms of methodology, other approaches which merit consideration in future studies include analysing personality disorder as a dimensional variable, and assessing depressive symptoms using instruments other than the BDI, such as the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale [20]; the reasons underlying the selection of specific methodologies and instruments in the ODIN study are outlined in previous papers [2] [6] [7] [8] [9]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The influence of severity of personality disorder on outcome of depression is unclear. Four hundred and ten patients with depression in 9 urban and rural communities in Finland, Ireland, Norway, Spain and the United Kingdom, were randomised to individual problem-solving treatment (n=121), group sessions on depression prevention (n=106) or treatment as usual (n=183). Depressive symptoms were recorded at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Personality assessment was performed using the Personality Assessment Schedule and analysed by severity (no personality disorder, personality difficulty, simple personality disorder, complex personality disorder). Complete personality assessments were performed on 301 individuals of whom 49.8% had no personality disorder; 19.3% had personality difficulties; 13.0% had simple personality disorder; and 17.9% had complex personality disorder. Severity of personality disorder was correlated with Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores at baseline (Spearman's r=0.21; p<0.001), 6 months (r=0.14; p=0.02) and 12 months (r=0.21; p=0.001). On multi-variable analysis, BDI at baseline (p<0.001) and type of treatment offered (individual therapy, group therapy, treatment as usual) (p=0.01) were significant independent predictors of BDI at 6 months. BDI at baseline was the sole significant independent predictor of BDI at 12 months (p<0.001). There was no interaction between personality disorder and treatment type for depression. While multi-variable analyses indicate that depressive symptoms at baseline are the strongest predictor of depressive symptoms at 6 and 12 months, the strong correlations between severity of personality disorder and depressive symptoms make it difficult to establish the independent effect of personality disorder on outcome of depression.
    European Psychiatry 02/2009; 24(5):322-6. DOI:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2008.12.004 · 3.44 Impact Factor
Show more