Article

Cellular and humoral inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections - Results of a prospective randomized trial

Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlín, Berlin, Germany
Surgical Endoscopy (Impact Factor: 3.31). 06/2001; 15(6):600-8. DOI: 10.1007/s004640090032
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Surgical trauma and anesthesia are known to cause transient postoperative suppression of the immune system. In randomized controlled trials, it has been shown that laparoscopic colorectal resections have short-term benefits not observed with conventional colorectal resections. We hypothesized that these benefits were due to the reduction in surgical trauma, leading to a diminished cytokine response and less depression of cell-mediated immunity after laparoscopy.
In a prospective randomized trial, colorectal cancer patients without evidence of metastatic disease underwent either laparoscopic (n = 20) or conventional (n = 20) tumor resection. Postoperative immune function was assessed by measuring the white blood cell (WBC) count, the CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes, the CD4+/CD8+/ratio, and the HLA-DR expression of CD14+ monocytes. In addition, the production of interleukin-6 (IL = 6) and TNF-a were measured after ex vivo stimulation of mononuclear blood cells with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and compared to the plasma levels of these cytokines. Postoperative mean levels of the immunologic parameters for the two groups were calculated and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.
Preoperatively, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of patient characteristics or immunologic parameters. Although the postoperative peak concentrations of white blood cells were significant lower in the laparoscopic group than the conventional group (p < 0.05), there were no differences between the two groups in the subpopulation of lymphocytes (CD4+, CD8+). HLA-DR expression of CD14+ monocytes was lower in the conventional group on the 4th postoperative day (p < 0.05). The laparoscopic group showed higher values in cytokine production of mononuclear blood cells after LPS stimulation. Postoperative plasma peak concentrations of IL-6 and TNF-a were lower after laparoscopic resection.
Postoperative cell-mediated immunity was better preserved after laparoscopic than after conventional colorectal resection. Cellular cytokine production was preserved only in the laparoscopic group, while cytokine plasma levels were significantly higher in the conventional group. These findings may have important implications for the use of laparoscopic colorectal resection, especially in patients with malignant disease.

0 Followers
 · 
94 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: LAPAROSCOPIC APPROACH IN COLO-RECTAL SURGERY FOR CANCER: IS IT LAWFULL ? (Abstract): A lot of surgeons were performing laparoscopic approach for colo-rectal surgery from at least 10 years. Even some reported results were "excellent", there are discussions about this subject. I performed a review of the literature; I found 11 randomised studies wich compared laparoscopic vs. open colectomies. Fesability of laparoscopic technique was established by a randomised multi-center study: operation time was increased with about one hour (vs. open surgery) and conversion rate was 15 -16%. The technique is difficult and conversion rate decreased with experience of the surgeon. Postoperative course was better in laparoscopic surgery (from point of view of postoperative pain, postoperative ileus, respiratory complications, hospital stay and quality of life). Laparoscopic colo-rectal surgery is more expensive that open technique. In all this papers, I didn't find significant "oncologic" difference between laparoscopic and open colo-rectal resections. Conclusions: laparoscopic colectomies are safe for experienced surgeons; laparoscopic technique is indicated in selection cases. La chirurgie colo-rectale laparoscopique est régulièrement pratiquée par de multiples équipes depuis de plus 10 ans. De nombreux "centres experts" ont rapporté d'excellent résultat. Pourtant la question de sa légitimité reste d'actualité. Dans les recommandations 2000 en chirurgie colo rectale [1], les experts réunis par le NIH prônaient de continuer à respecter la règle édictée en 1994 par la Société Américaine des chirurgiens colo-rectaux: la colectomie par laparoscopie pour cancer colo-rectal ne devrait pas être pratiquée en dehors d'études contrôlées [2]. Cette attitude reste également recommandée en France [3]. Ces recommandations sont fondées sur l'absence de données factuelles ("evidence based") suffisantes concernant le "bénéfice" et surtout l'absence de risque carcinologique de l'intervention. Le but de ce travail est de recenser les données factuelles disponibles (essais randomisés, méta-analyses, études prospectives) et d'en analyser la pertinence. METHODE Une recherche bibliographique électronique, conduite en juillet 2004, a permis de retrouver 11 essais randomisés, parfois publiés plusieurs fois, qui comparent colectomie laparoscopique et colectomie par laparotomie pour cancers colo-rectaux [4-21]. Deux autres essais incluant diverses affections dont une majorité de cancers ont été publiés [22,24]. Ces essais sont énumérés dans le tableau 1. Il s'agit souvent de petits essais, de qualité méthodologique rarement excellente [25], ou de résultats préliminaires des grands essais en cours. Seuls, trois essais peuvent faire état d'un recul supérieur à deux ans [18-20]. Les principales études prospectives non randomisées récentes [28-34] ont été analysées ainsi que les méta-analyses et les revues systématiques [33-36].
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The introduction of laparoscopic colon resection for colon carcinoma in the 1990s was accompanied by a series of case reports of port site recurrences which appeared to occur with alarming frequency [1–8]. These reports tempered the initial enthusiasm for laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer. They also prompted several lines of laboratory and clinical investigation, including animal experiments which attempted to replicate the cancer biology of laparoscopic cancer surgery, prospective accumulation of data regarding laparoscopic colon resection, and finally the organization and execution of several large-scale randomized clinical trials comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colorectal cancer.
Show more

Similar Publications