Drug-Related Deaths in a Department of Internal Medicine

Department of Chemistry, University of Oslo, Kristiania (historical), Oslo, Norway
Archives of Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 17.33). 11/2001; 161(19):2317-23. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.161.19.2317
Source: PubMed


Drug therapy is associated with adverse effects, and fatal adverse drug events (ADEs) have become major hospital problems. Our study assesses the incidence of fatal ADEs in a major medical department and identifies possible patient characteristics signifying fatal ADE risk.
During a 2-year period, a multidisciplinary study group examined all 732 patients who died--5.2% of the 13992 patients admitted to the Department of Internal Medicine, Central Hospital of Akershus, Nordbyhagen, Norway. Decisions about the presence or absence of fatal ADEs were based on aggregated clinical records, autopsy results, and findings from premortem and postmortem drug analyses.
In 18.2% of the patients (133/732) (95% confidence interval, 15.4%-21.0%), deaths were classified as being directly (64 [48.1%] of 133) or indirectly (69 [51.9%] of 133) associated with 1 or more drugs (this equals 9.5 deaths per 1000 hospitalized patients). Those with fatal ADEs (cases) were older, had more diseases, and used more drugs than those without fatal ADEs (noncases). In 75 of the 133 patients with fatal ADEs, autopsy findings and/or drug analysis data were decisive for recognizing the ADEs; in 62 of the remaining 595 patients, similar data proved necessary to exclude the suspicion of a fatal ADE. Major culprit drugs were cardiovascular, antithrombotic, and sympathomimetic agents.
Fatal ADEs represent a major hospital problem, especially in elderly patients with multiple diseases. A higher number of drugs administered was associated with a higher frequency of fatal ADEs, but whether a high number of drugs is an independent risk factor for fatal ADEs is unsettled. Autopsy results and the findings of premortem and postmortem drug analyses were important for recognizing and excluding suspected fatal ADEs.

Download full-text


Available from: Thor Arthur Hilberg,
  • Source
    • "Adverse drug effects (ADEs) are a primary reason patients die in a hospital (Bates et al, 1995). As a result of the intricate and complex nature of the cardiovascular system, cardiovascular drugs are known to cause the most ADEs (Ebbesen et al, 2001). Even more difficult for trainees to understand is the varying effects drugs and other medical interventions have on patients with abnormal circulatory physiology. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of an ontology is to structurally define knowledge about a topic. For the practice of simulation, ontologies have been demonstrated to be useful across a variety of techniques ranging from formally defining the components of dynamic models and capturing key simulation domain constraints to interrelating dynamic model components and geometry in order to visualize a phenomenon. We have created a methodology that requires domain ontologies to be rendered in the human-interface layer in support of the construction of dynamic models and their corresponding visualizations. We hypothesize that this methodology will provide a novel and accessible way to author visualizations and a framework for creating new teaching tools that merge concrete and abstract knowledge. A case study of our methodology is performed by applying our software prototype to simulation and visualization in the domain of healthcare, specifically cardiovascular physiology
    Journal of Simulation 02/2011; 5(3):147-156. DOI:10.1057/jos.2011.5 · 0.58 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Of the 133 lethal ADR 66 (49.6%) were classified as preventable. In 56 cases the patients presented a drug overdose; 43 patients were already hospitalised with an overdose [15] [17]. If the data of the Scandinavian study were transferred to Germany taking into account 6 million hospitalisations in internal medicine per year, 57,000 lethal cases of ADR would be expected [37]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A multicentre retrospective analysis of 4450 autopsies carried out due to suspicion of medical malpractice in 17 German institutes of forensic medicine from 1990 to 2000 was performed for the German Federal Ministry of Health. During the time period analysed an increase of cases could be mentioned. The main results of the study are: in the cooperating institutes the total number of autopsies due to suspected medical malpractice ranged from 1.4 to 20%. In more than 40% of the cases preliminary proceedings were started because the manner of death was certified as non-natural or not clarified. Hospital doctors were more affected by medical malpractice claims than doctors in private practice. However, the number of confirmed cases of medical malpractice was higher for doctors in private practice than for hospital doctors. Although surgery is still at the top of the disciplines involved in medical malpractice claims the number of confirmed surgical cases was below the average. Mistakes in care were confirmed to be above the average. Medico-legal autopsies are still a very sufficient method to evaluate cases of medical malpractice: 2863 cases could already be clarified by autopsy. Up to now there is no systematic registration of medical malpractice charges in Germany. A systematic registration should be initiated to build up and/or improve error reporting systems and, thus, to improve patient safety. Compared to other sources of medical malpractice claims (arbitration committees of the medical chambers, reference material of health and insurance companies, files of civil courts) the data of the present multicentre study are in so far unique as only lethal cases were evaluated and a complete autopsy report was available as basis of an expert opinion in alleged medical malpractice cases.
    Forensic science international 07/2009; 190(1-3):58-66. DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.05.013 · 2.14 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "found that one out of six deaths in a medical department was caused by drug treatment rather than by illness [5]. Sub-optimal drug use may be listed in three different categories: over-use or polypharmacy, under-use, and inappropriate use [6] [7]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess Norwegian general practitioners' (GPs') level of potentially harmful drug prescribing for elderly patients. Prescription data for 12 months were retrospectively retrieved from the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD). Data were assessed in relation to 13 prescription quality indicators. General practice. A total of 454 GPs attending continuous medical education (CME) groups in Southern Norway, 85,836 patients >or=70 years who received any prescription from the GPs during the study period. Number of prescriptions assessed in relation to pharmacological inappropriateness based on a list of 13 explicit prescription quality indicators. Some 18.4% of the patients (66% females with mean age 79.8 years, 34% males with mean age 78.7 years) received one or more inappropriate prescriptions from their GP. An NSAID in a potentially harmful combination with another drug (7%) and a long-acting benzodiazepine (4.6%) were the most frequent inappropriate prescriptions made. Doctor characteristics associated with more inappropriate prescribing practice were old age and working single-handed with many elderly patients. The study reveals areas where GPs' prescribing practice for elderly patients can be improved and which can be targeted in educational interventions.
    Scandinavian journal of primary health care 07/2008; 26(2):80-5. DOI:10.1080/02813430802002875 · 1.30 Impact Factor
Show more