The privilege study: an empirical examination of the psychotherapist-patient privilege.

North Carolina law review 07/1982; 60(5):893-942.
Source: PubMed
1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Confidentiality is widely considered to be of great importance in psychotherapy. With few exceptions, the breaching of confidentiality is an ethical violation and grounds for litigation. One such exception is the mandated reporting of known or suspected child abuse, representing a legally sanctioned limitation of confidentiality. Because clients generally expect unlimited confidentiality in therapeutic relationships, many therapists have begun to "forewarn" clients as a matter of informed consent. This research report: (a) briefly reviews issues surrounding mandatory reporting and confidentiality as they relate to forewarning, (b) defines and discusses forewarning as contrasted with "informing," (c) examines state statutes, case law and ethical guidelines relevant to forewarning, and (d) presents a survey of 428 mental health providers (MHPs) on their forewarning practices in which 36.9% forewarned all clients, 36.4% informed clients only upon suspicion of abuse, and 20.6% informed only after receiving a disclosure of abuse. The implications of these findings are discussed.
    Behavioral Sciences & the Law 02/1993; 11(2):181-92. · 0.96 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: All 51 jurisdictions in the United States require physicians to report suspected child abuse. In most jurisdictions, reporting requirements override both confidentiality and privilege associated with the physician-patient relationship. The authors review the literature relevant to the conflict between privacy and reporting abuse and report the results of a national survey of therapists at sex offender treatment units. They discuss ethical problems experienced under these statutes by therapists who attempt to provide treatment for sex offenders, and by therapists who are required to report past instances of child abuse even when there is no evidence of ongoing abuse.
    Behavioral Sciences & the Law 02/1987; 5(2):161-74. · 0.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article explores the current ethical and legal standards concerning confidentiality in therapeutic relationships. It examines the existing literature concerning mental health professionals' experiences and attitudes towards confidentiality as well as patients' expectations. It argues that the existing standards are complex and confusing. It is suggested that there is a real need for comprehensive guidelines as to the circumstances in which confidentiality may be breached in order to help mental health professionals provide the best possible health care to their patients. The article outlines the methodology of a project funded by the Australian Research Council which aims to provide comprehensive guidelines for mental health professionals in this area.
    Psychiatry Psychology and Law 02/2008; · 0.35 Impact Factor