Article

Transcriptional and spatiotemporal regulation of prolactin receptor mRNA and cooperativity with progesterone receptor function during ductal branch growth in the mammary gland

Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology Section, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-1402, USA.
Developmental Dynamics (Impact Factor: 2.67). 10/2001; 222(2):192-205. DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.1179
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Ductal branching within the mammary gland is stimulated by prolactin (PRL) and progesterone (P) acting through their receptors (PRLR and PR). Analysis of mammary gland PRLR expression revealed increasing expression of the long form (L-PRLR) and two of the three short forms (S1- and S3-PRLR) during puberty that became maximal late in pubescence and early gestation, then declined during gestation. By contrast, S2-PRLR mRNA levels remained constant. Examination of stromal PRLR revealed the consistent expression of L-PRLR mRNA. By contrast, S1-PRLR was present only in the mammary fat pad of neonates, whereas high neonatal expression of S2-PRLR became undetectable during puberty. Stromal expression of S3-PRLR decreased to low levels during puberty and was undetectable during lactation and involution. Exogenous PRL stimulated DNA synthesis in both epithelial and adjacent stromal cells in vivo. Distribution of PRLR mRNA in mammary epithelium was homogeneous before puberty and heterogeneous during puberty, gestation, and early lactation. A mutual role for PRLR and PR was suggested wherein PR mRNA increased beyond 6 weeks to maximal levels during puberty and gestation then became undetectable during lactation. In situ hybridization revealed that PR mRNA distribution is homogeneous in the ductal epithelium before 6 weeks and heterogenous during puberty and gestation and that PRLR and PR are similarly distributed in the ductal epithelium. Neither hormone stimulated DNA synthesis in mammary glands of ovariectomized females while their effects interacted markedly. These results demonstrate differential PRLR transcription by epithelial and stromal cells and a similar distribution of PRLR and PR that may facilitate the interaction between P and PRL during ductal branching in the mammary gland.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Josephine F Trott, Jun 20, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
66 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A woman's breast cancer risk is affected by her reproductive history. The hormonal milieu also influences the course of the disease. The female reproductive hormones, estrogens, progesterone, and prolactin, have a major impact on breast cancer and control postnatal mammary gland development. Analysis of hormone receptor mutant mouse strains combined with tissue recombination techniques and proteomics revealed that sequential activation of hormone signaling in the mammary epithelium is required for progression of morphogenesis. Hormones impinge on a subset of luminal mammary epithelial cells (MECs) that express hormone receptors and act as sensor cells translating and amplifying systemic signals into local stimuli. Proliferation is induced by paracrine mechanisms mediated by distinct factors at different stages. Tissue and stage specificity of hormonal signaling is achieved at the molecular level by different chromatin contexts and differential recruitment of coactivators and corepressors.
    Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology 12/2010; 2(12):a003178. DOI:10.1101/cshperspect.a003178 · 8.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this study, we quantified the effects of in utero exposure to the herbicide atrazine on subsequent mammary gland development. Atrazine was administered to pregnant female Long Evans rats from gestation days 13-19 at doses of 0, 6.5, 50, or 100 mg/kg/day. A pair-fed control group was yoked to the high-dose atrazine-treated group. Litter size was standardized to 10 pups on postnatal day (PND) 4. Whole mounts of the left fourth mammary gland and histologic sections of the right fourth gland were obtained from a subgroup of offspring on PND1, 21, 33, on day of vaginal opening (VO), or around PND65 at diestrus. A blinded, quantitative analysis of key morphological features in mammary gland whole mounts (ductal elongation, ductal network area, epithelial area, terminal end bud [TEB] incidence, and epithelial density) as well as epithelial proliferation within different parenchymal structures was conducted. There was no effect of atrazine exposure on any of the measures of mammary gland development at the maternal dose of 6.5 mg/kg/day. On PND1, ductal elongation was increased by approximately 20% (p < 0.05) in the female offspring born to dams exposed to 50 and 100 mg/kg/day atrazine, coincident with decreased epithelial proliferation in the 100 mg/kg/day group at this age. These differences were not present on PND21, or thereafter. An increased incidence of TEB in the mammary glands from females that were born to both the pair-fed and 50 mg/kg/day-treated dams at the time of VO indicated that this response was a specific result of maternal caloric restriction. Collectively, these data indicate that maternal atrazine exposure has no long-term effects on mammary gland development in female offspring beyond a transitory response to high doses at PND1.
    Toxicological Sciences 11/2010; 119(2):380-90. DOI:10.1093/toxsci/kfq337 · 4.48 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Prolactin (PRL) acts through its receptor (PRLR) via both endocrine and local paracrine/autocrine pathways to regulate biological processes including reproduction and lactation. We analyzed the tissue- and stage of gestation-specific regulation of PRL and PRLR expression in various tissues of pigs. Abundance of pPRLR-long form (LF) mRNA increased in the mammary gland and endometrium during gestation while in other tissues it remained constant. There was a parallel increase in the abundance of the pPRLR-LF protein in the mammary gland and endometrium during gestation. We determined the hormonal regulation of pPRLR-LF mRNA expression in various tissues from ovariectomized, hypoprolactinemic gilts given combinations of the replacement hormones estrogen (E(2)), progestin (P), and/or haloperidol-induced PRL. Abundance of pPRLR-LF mRNA in kidney and liver was unaffected by hormone treatments. Expression of uterine pPRLR-LF mRNA was induced by E(2) whereas the effect of E(2) was abolished by co-administering P. The expression of pPRLR-LF mRNA in the mammary gland stroma was induced by PRL, whereas E(2) induced its expression in the epithelium. In contrast to these changes in pPRLR expression, pPRL expression was relatively constant and low during gestation in all tissues except the pituitary. Taken together, these data reveal that specific combinations of E(2), P, and PRL differentially regulate pPRLR-LF expression in the endometrium and mammary glands, and that the action of PRL on its target tissues is dependent upon pPRLR-LF abundance more so than the local PRL expression.
    Journal of Endocrinology 05/2009; 202(1):153-66. DOI:10.1677/JOE-08-0486 · 3.59 Impact Factor