Article

Pain assessment in the cognitively impaired and unimpaired elderly.

University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing, 985330 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-5330, USA.
Pain Management Nursing (Impact Factor: 1.7). 12/2000; 1(4):106-15. DOI: 10.1053/jpmn.2000.19332
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to determine the self-report pain rating scale(s) that can be used to quantify pain in elderly persons across cognitive functioning levels. Randomly selected elderly subjects (N = 100) completed the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire to categorize their level of cognitive impairment: intact (n = 36), mild (n = 9), moderate (n = 15), and severe (n = 40). Pain was measured with the Memorial Pain Assessment Card verbal subscale, FACES, COOP pain subscale, a numeric rating scale, and the Present Pain Intensity subscale of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Receiver operator characteristic curves indicated that participants categorized with moderate to no cognitive impairment were able to complete 1 or more of the pain assessment tools. Of the severely impaired, 30% were able to complete 1 or more pain assessment tools. Intraclass correlations showed a high degree of consistency among all pairs of tools (intraclass correlation > 0.74). We conclude that most elderly, with normal to moderately impaired cognitive functioning, as well as some severely impaired elderly, are capable of using self-report tools to rate their pain.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
47 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Geriatric Multidimensional Pain and Illness Inventory (GMPI) was developed in order to assess the perceptual, functional, and emotional concomitants of pain and illness in long-term care. The GMPI was administered to 401 adults aged 60 and older residing in one of 16 long-term care facilities. The GMPI items were analyzed for reliability, content validity, and convergent and discriminant validity. Factor analysis of the GMPI items revealed three subscales, level of pain severity, level of functional limitations associated with pain, and level of emotional distress associated with pain. The GMPI items were significantly correlated with items from the Geriatric Depression scale, the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Exam, and the Activities of Daily Living. The GMPI is evidenced to be a reliable and valid assessment tool for assessing pain of residents in long term care facilities. Its brevity and clearly defined assessment criteria are assets to the administering clinician. Research on the utility of the GMPI as a treatment outcome instrument in long-term care is warranted. The potential for social workers and registered nurses to administer the GMPI in long-term care settings is discussed.
    Clinical Gerontologist 10/2008; 28(3):45-61. · 0.46 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite many studies conducted to validate the self-reported pain of vulnerable patients, it is unclear at what level of cognitive impairment individuals still can provide reliable information. The aims of this study were to examine the reliability and validity of self-reported pain by degree of patients' cognitive function and to determine important predictors of self-reported pain in cognitively impaired residents in long-term care facilities. The 414 participants were divided into four groups according to their scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination (nonimpaired, mild, moderate, and severe cognitive impairment). Multifaceted measures were performed to validate residents' pain reports. Self-reported pain and pain behaviors were measured using the Verbal Descriptor Scale and the Doloplus-2 scale. Known correlates of pain including functional disability, depression, and agitation were compared, using the Barthel Index, the Cornell scale, and the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory. Intra-rater and interrater reliability were generally acceptable in groups with no impairment to moderate cognitive impairment. The relationships between residents' self-reported pain and the known correlates of pain were almost all significant across groups with no impairment to moderate cognitive impairment, but fewer were significant in the severely impaired group. Regression analyses revealed that multiple pain indicators together were significantly better predictors of self-reported pain in moderately and severely impaired residents. The findings from this study support residents with cognitive impairment up to a moderate level can report pain reliably. However, for those in later stages of dementia, a multifaceted approach is suggested to help in pain recognition.
    Pain Management Nursing 09/2014; · 1.70 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pain is a serious adverse poststroke complication. The combination of a vertical numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) and the face pain scale (FPS) has been advocated to measure poststroke pain. This study investigated whether the NPRS supplemented with the FPS (NPRSFPS) would show good test-retest reliability in people with stroke. This study examined the relative and absolute reliabilities of the vertical NPRSFPS in people with stroke. This study was a test-retest design. Fifty patients >3 months' poststroke participating in an outpatient occupational therapy program were recruited through medical centers to rate current pain intensity twice, at a 1-week interval, on the 0-10 vertical NPRS-FPS. The relative reliability of the vertical NPRS-FPS was analyzed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for determining the degree of consistency and agreement between two measures. The standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest real difference (SRD), and Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LOA) were the absolute reliability indices used to quantify measurement errors and determine systematic biases of the repeated measures. The relative reliability of the NPRS-FPS was substantial (ICC = 0.82). The SEM and SRD at 90% confidence of the NPRS-FPS were 0.81 and 1.87, respectively. The Bland-Altman analyses showed no significant systematic bias between the repeated measurements for the vertical NPRS-FPS. The NPRS-FPS had narrow LOA ranges (LOA, -2.50 to 1.90), indicating high stability and little variation over time. The pain intensity of patients was from no pain to a moderate level of pain. These findings suggest that the vertical NPRS-FPS is a reliable measure of pain in people with stroke, with good relative and absolute reliabilities.
    Physical Therapy 09/2013; · 2.78 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
0 Downloads
Available from
Dec 18, 2014