Article

Independent genome-wide scans identify a chromosome 18 quantitative-trait locus influencing dyslexia.

Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK.
Nature Genetics (Impact Factor: 29.65). 02/2002; 30(1):86-91. DOI: 10.1038/ng792
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Developmental dyslexia is defined as a specific and significant impairment in reading ability that cannot be explained by deficits in intelligence, learning opportunity, motivation or sensory acuity. It is one of the most frequently diagnosed disorders in childhood, representing a major educational and social problem. It is well established that dyslexia is a significantly heritable trait with a neurobiological basis. The etiological mechanisms remain elusive, however, despite being the focus of intensive multidisciplinary research. All attempts to map quantitative-trait loci (QTLs) influencing dyslexia susceptibility have targeted specific chromosomal regions, so that inferences regarding genetic etiology have been made on the basis of very limited information. Here we present the first two complete QTL-based genome-wide scans for this trait, in large samples of families from the United Kingdom and United States. Using single-point analysis, linkage to marker D18S53 was independently identified as being one of the most significant results of the genome in each scan (P< or =0.0004 for single word-reading ability in each family sample). Multipoint analysis gave increased evidence of 18p11.2 linkage for single-word reading, yielding top empirical P values of 0.00001 (UK) and 0.0004 (US). Measures related to phonological and orthographic processing also showed linkage at this locus. We replicated linkage to 18p11.2 in a third independent sample of families (from the UK), in which the strongest evidence came from a phoneme-awareness measure (most significant P value=0.00004). A combined analysis of all UK families confirmed that this newly discovered 18p QTL is probably a general risk factor for dyslexia, influencing several reading-related processes. This is the first report of QTL-based genome-wide scanning for a human cognitive trait.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
105 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study builds on the hypothesis put forth in Boeckx and Benítez-Burraco (2014), according to which the developmental changes expressed at the levels of brain morphology and neural connectivity that resulted in a more globular braincase in our species were crucial to understand the origins of our language-ready brain. Specifically, this paper explores the links between two well-known 'language-related' genes like FOXP2 and ROBO1 implicated in vocal learning and the initial set of genes of interest put forth in Boeckx and Benítez-Burraco (2014), with RUNX2 as focal point. Relying on the existing literature, we uncover potential molecular links that could be of interest to future experimental inquiries into the biological foundations of language and the testing of our initial hypothesis. Our discussion could also be relevant for clinical linguistics and for the interpretation of results from paleogenomics.
    Frontiers in Psychology 01/2014; 5:1324. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01324 · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neuroimaging has had an enormous impact on the way human cognition is studied in vivo. With the advent of fMRI, scientists have been able to ask questions regarding individual differences which could not have been addressed with PET. These, are particularly important for studying developmental disorders, such as dyslexia because research suggests that participants with dyslexia (DPs) form a heterogeneous population. There are three main theories of dyslexia: the phonological (PDT), visual magnocellular (MDT) and cerebellar (CDT). The majority of neuroimaging studies, motivated by these theories, have shortcomings. First, they have relied on group comparisons which can obscure the less frequent differences between DPs and controls (CPs). Second, they mostly tested one underlying cause, postulated by one theory. Third, the majority of them focused on detecting a deficit without empirically demonstrating its relationship with reading deficit which defines this disorder. The goal of this research is to shed more light on the neural correlates of reading deficit in dyslexia and address these criticisms. First, by using a multiple case study to investigate individual differences among DPs. Such comparisons would not have been possible with PET. Second, by contrasting the predictions, of each of the main theories, on the neural correlates of the reading impairment in one sample of DPs. The behavioural studies suggest that there are subtypes of dyslexia, however, they cannot be tested by focusing on one theory. Third, by using a reading task and fMRI - which provides an opportunity for directly testing the relationship between the predictions of a given theory and the neural correlates of reading impairment. Eighteen individual DPs and 16 CPs were tested in a multiple case study. Participants were right-handed, with native English, normal vision and hearing and without clinical ADHD and DCD. To ensure that no confounds were present due to differences between a DP and CPs in IQ, handedness and age, these were entered into the analysis as covariates. The neuroimaging task involved silent reading of individual words and fixating on a cross (baseline) in an event-related design. Four findings were revealed. First, the neural correlates of reading deficit in dyslexia in all cases, except one, are consistent with the predictions of the PDT and CDT, in one case with the visual MDT and in ten cases with a hypothetical visual (not magnocellular) deficit theory; most cases are consistent with more than one theory. Second, there are considerable individual differences in the neural correlates of reading deficit. Even where they are consistent with the same theory in two DPs, the areas can differ. Third, the results reveal that the lack of deficit on a behavioural test does not mean that the neural correlates of reading are intact. Fourth, a large number of DPs who have a similar profile on the behavioural measures exhibited dissimilar profiles on the neural level. These findings suggest that endophenotypes uncovered by neuroimaging will enable researchers to find important links between the behavioural and genetic characteristics of DPs. Multidisciplinary research on individual differences, including neuroimaging, behavioural and genetic measures within a multiple-deficit model holds significant promise.
    Advances in Neuroimaging Research, Edited by Victoria Asher-Hansley, 05/2014: chapter 1: pages 1-119; Nova Science Publishers., ISBN: 978-1-63321-307-4
  • Source
    Acta Neuropsychologica 08/2012; 10(2):163-191. DOI:10.5604/17307503.1008234

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
141 Downloads
Available from
Jun 5, 2014