Disparities in health care by race, ethnicity, and language among the insured: findings from a national sample.
ABSTRACT Racial and ethnic disparities in health care have been well documented, but poorly explained.
To examine the effect of access barriers, including English fluency, on racial and ethnic disparities in health care.
Cross-sectional analysis of the Community Tracking Survey (1996-1997).
Adults 18 to 64 years with private or Medicaid health insurance.
Independent variables included race, ethnicity, and English fluency. Dependent variables included having had a physician or mental health visit, influenza vaccination, or mammogram during the past year.
The health care use pattern for English-speaking Hispanic patients was not significantly different than for non-Hispanic white patients in the crude or multivariate models. In contrast, Spanish-speaking Hispanic patients were significantly less likely than non-Hispanic white patients to have had a physician visit (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.72-0.83), mental health visit (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.32-0.76), or influenza vaccination (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.15-0.52). After adjustment for predisposing, need, and enabling factors, Spanish-speaking Hispanic patients showed significantly lower use than non-Hispanic white patients across all four measures. Black patients had a significantly lower crude relative risk of having received an influenza vaccination (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.87). Adjustment for additional factors had little impact on this effect, but resulted in black patients being significantly less likely than non-Hispanic white patients to have had a visit with a mental health professional (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37-0.55).
Among insured nonelderly adults, there are appreciable disparities in health-care use by race and Hispanic ethnicity. Ethnic disparities in care are largely explained by differences in English fluency, but racial disparities in care are not explained by commonly used access factors.
SourceAvailable from: Hope Landrine[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To conduct meaningful, epidemiologic research on racial-ethnic health disparities, racial-ethnic samples must be rendered equivalent on other social status and contextual variables via statistical controls of those extraneous factors. The racial-ethnic groups must also be equally familiar with and have similar responses to the methods and measures used to collect health data, must have equal opportunity to participate in the research, and must be equally representative of their respective populations. In the absence of such measurement equivalence, studies of racial-ethnic health disparities are confounded by a plethora of unmeasured, uncontrolled correlates of race-ethnicity. Those correlates render the samples, methods, and measures incomparable across racial-ethnic groups, and diminish the ability to attribute health differences discovered to race-ethnicity vs. to its correlates. This paper reviews the non-equivalent yet normative samples, methodologies and measures used in epidemiologic studies of racial-ethnic health disparities, and provides concrete suggestions for improving sample, method, and scalar measurement equivalence.Frontiers in Public Health 12/2014; 2:282. DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2014.00282
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Kidney care and public policy have been linked for 40 years, with various consequences to outcomes. The 1972 Social Security Amendment, Section 2991, expanded Medicare coverage for all modalities of dialysis and transplant services and non-kidney-related care to those with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) regardless of age. This first and only disease-specific entitlement program was a step toward decreasing disparities in access to care. Despite this, disparities in kidney disease outcomes continue as they are based on many factors. Over the last 4 decades, policies have been enacted to understand and improve the delivery of ESRD care. More recent policies include novel shared-risk payment models to ensure quality and decrease costs. This article discusses the impact or potential impact of selected policies on health disparities in advanced chronic kidney disease and ESRD. Although it is too early to know the consequences of newer policies (Affordable Care Act, ESRD Prospective Payment System, Quality Incentive Program, Accountable Care Organizations), their goal of improving access to timely patient-centered appropriate affordable and quality care should lessen the disparity gap. The Nephrology community must leverage this dynamic state of care-delivery model redesign to decrease kidney-related health disparities. Copyright © 2015 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease 01/2015; 22(1). DOI:10.1053/j.ackd.2014.06.002 · 1.94 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A recent study found that Hispanic children are less likely than white children to have been diagnosed with an emotional, developmental, or behavioral problem. However, it is unclear whether the lower rates reflect the epidemiologic paradox of surprisingly good health for Hispanics or significant problems with underdiagnosis for this population. The present study uses the 2003 National Survey of Children's Health to compare the prevalence of diagnosed conditions of autism, ADHD, developmental delays, learning disabilities, and depression/anxiety for white and Hispanic children. It also examines parental concern with development and the discrepancy between parental concern and diagnosis for whites and Hispanics. Results reveal that Hispanic children are less likely than white children to have been diagnosed with autism, ADHD, developmental delays, and/or depression/anxiety. However, it reveals that parental concern with development is actually greater for Hispanic than for white parents. These findings cast doubt on assertions that Hispanic children are in surprisingly good health (epidemiologic paradox). Rather they suggest that the lower rates of diagnosed conditions may be due, in part, to underdiagnosis. Further, results identify the important and complex relationship between culture/language and underdiagnosis and call for more detailed investigations of these issues.Sociological focus 05/2009; 42(2):87-106. DOI:10.1080/00380237.2009.10571345