Article

Incidence of recall, nightmares, and hallucinations during analgosedation in intensive care.

University Hospital Charité, Department of Anaesthesiology, Campus Mitte, Schumannstrasse 20/21, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Intensive Care Medicine (Impact Factor: 5.54). 02/2002; 28(1):38-43. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-001-1168-3
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To define the incidence of recall and dreams during analgosedation in critically ill patients.
Prospective clinical study.
Anaesthesiological intensive care unit (ICU) in a university hospital. Patients and participants: Two hundred and eighty-nine critically ill patients, who either arrived intubated and sedated at the ICU or required intubation, mechanical ventilation, and sedation during their ICU stay.
none.
The patients were interviewed 48-72 h after discharge from the ICU. By a structured interview they were asked whether they recalled any event before they had regained consciousness at the ICU. Moreover they were asked for dreams. Descriptive statistics: 64.7% of all patients did not recall any event, before they regained consciousness. However, 17% ( n=49) of all patients indicated that they remembered the tracheal tube or being on the ventilator, before they woke up. Some patients (21.1%) reported dreams or dreamlike sensations. Some patients (9.3%) recalled nightmares, while 6.6% reported hallucinations.
Critically ill patients reported a high incidence of recall for unpleasant events, which they thought to have taken place before they regained consciousness. The patients, who stayed longer than 24 h at the ICU, indicated vivid memory for nightmares and hallucinations. Further studies are suggested to evaluate: 1) whether there is an impact of the present findings on outcome; and 2) whether clinical scores for sedation or neurophysiological monitoring help to define the exact time, when recall happens, in order to guide therapeutic intervention.

1 Bookmark
 · 
251 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Disturbed dreaming has been identified as a common primary or secondary symptom in several medical conditions, in addition to idiopathic nightmares and sleep–wake transition disorders. In these medical conditions, dream disturbances vary along a continuum of dream experience intensity. At the lower extreme of this continuum, dream recall ceases entirely (global cessation of dreaming) or is unusually impoverished in quantity or content (dream impoverishment). Impoverishment affects patients with alexithymia, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and some brain syndromes. At the higher extreme, dreaming is uncharacteristically excessive, vivid, and emo-tional (excessive dreaming). Excessive dreaming occurs in patients with epic dreaming, some brain lesions, and with-drawal from some medications. Dreaming may become so intense that it is confused with reality (dream–reality confu-sion), as is the case with the existential dreams of bereave-ment, with postpartum infant peril dreams, with intensive care unit delirium dreams, with dreams resulting from limbic lobe damage, and with psychotic dream-related aggression. Intense dreaming may also become rigidly stereotyped in structure (dream stereotypy). Conditions such as rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) with or with-out parkinsonism, epilepsy, PTSD reexperiencing dreams, migraine dreams, and prodromal cardiac dreams are affected by dream stereotypy. In many cases, dream disturbances appear to be aberrations of otherwise normal dream qualities, such as intensification, reality-mimesis, or recurrence. Often, sleep fragmentation is implicated in the disturbance, but causal relationships are not yet clear. Although it is primarily REM sleep that is involved, some disturbances are also seen in disorders affecting non-REM sleep. Effective treatments are available for many common disturbances, and other treat-ments are under development. In addition to the common dream disturbances of idiopathic nightmares and sleep–wake transition disorders (see Chapter 77), disturbed dreaming has been identified as a common primary or secondary symptom in several other medical con-ditions (Table 78–1). These disturbances can be organized conveniently along a continuum of varying vividness or intensity of the dream experience. At the lower extreme of this continuum, dream recall ceases entirely or is unusually impoverished in quantity or content. At the higher extreme, it is uncharacteristically excessive, vivid, and emotional, frequently confused with reality or rigidly stereotyped in structure.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To investigate the relationship between sedation and the memories reported by patients subjected to mechanical ventilation following discharge from the intensive care unit. Methods: This prospective, observational, cohort study was conducted with individuals subjected to mechanical ventilation who remained in the intensive care unit for more than 24 hours. Clinical statistics and sedation records were extracted from the participants' clinical records; the data relative to the participants' memories were collected using a specific validated instrument. Assessment was performed three months after discharge from the intensive care unit. Results: A total of 128 individuals were assessed, most of whom (84.4%) reported recollections from their stay in the intensive care unit as predominantly a combination of real and illusory events. The participants subjected to sedation (67.2%) at deep levels (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale [RASS] -4 and -5) for more than two days and those with psychomotor agitation (33.6%) exhibited greater susceptibility to occurrence of illusory memories (p>0.001). Conclusion: The probability of the occurrence of illusory memories was greater among the participants who were subjected to deep sedation. Sedation seems to be an additional factor that contributed to the occurrence of illusory memories in severely ill individuals subjected to mechanical ventilation.
    Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva 04/2014; 26(2):122-129.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Insgesamt 6 Beiträge des Sommerworkshops ,,Schmerz und Bewusstsein“ der Deutschen Interdisziplinären Vereinigung für Schmerztherapie e.V. (DIVS) am 27./28. Mai 2005 in Marienfeld werden exemplarisch vorgestellt. Ein Beitrag über die Schmerzdarstellung im Gehirn legt die Vorteile funktioneller Bildgebungsmethoden dar: Diese erlauben die Charakterisierung von Teilaspekten der zerebralen Schmerzverarbeitung und Mechanismen der Chronifizierung bei Schmerzsyndromen. Ein weiterer Überblick erläutert den Einfluss unterschiedlicher Analgetika, Sedativa und Anästhetika auf die unterschiedlichen Bewusstseinszustände. Das Krankheitserleben von Rückenschmerzenpatienten wird in einer Studie mit Hilfe des Erklärungsmodell-Interviews untersucht: Somatische Aspekte dominieren dabei; für 3/4 der Patienten spielen aber auch psychische Ursachenvorstellungen eine Rolle. Wie Schmerz in verschiedenen Religionsgemeinschaften interpretiert und akzeptiert wird, zeigt eine religionsgeschichtlich-theologische Übersicht. Ein weiterer Beitrag stellt die Wirksamkeit der Hypnose als ergänzende Maßnahme anästhesiologischer Verfahren in der operativen Medizin, bei chronischen Schmerzen und bei experimentellem Akutschmerz dar. Mit dem Schmerzerleben in verschiedenen Kulturen beschäftigt sich der letzte Beitrag: Eine einseitige ethnozentristische Sicht kann demnach zu Verständigungsschwierigkeit und Fehlurteilen bei der Behandlung ausländischer Patienten führen. Der Workshop beleuchtete insgesamt in konzentriertem Rahmen wichtige Gestaltungsfaktoren der Schmerzverarbeitung und gab stimulierende Ausblicke auf diesen Teil der Schmerzforschung und künftige Therapiemöglichkeiten.
    Der Schmerz 01/2007; 21(3). · 1.02 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
1 Download
Available from