Impact of discontinuing a hospital-based air ambulance service on trauma patient outcomes.

Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-1172, USA.
The Journal of trauma (Impact Factor: 2.35). 04/2002; 52(3):486-91. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200203000-00012
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The clinical benefit of aeromedical transportation of injured patients in the civilian population has been debated. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of discontinuing a hospital-based helicopter transport program on trauma patient outcomes, with the hypothesis that the loss of an air ambulance would result in increased transport time and increased mortality among severely injured patients.
Data on injury severity and patient outcomes were collected prospectively for the 12 months immediately preceding and 24 months following discontinuation of the helicopter ambulance service. Transport time, mortality rate, and hospital length of stay was compared.
The number of trauma patient admissions decreased 12%, with a 17% decrease in admissions of severely injured patients. Transport time decreased, with no change in mortality.
Discontinuation of a hospital-based air ambulance service did not increase transport time or increase mortality for trauma patients.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Air ambulance transport for injured patients is vitally important given increasing patient volumes, the limited number of trauma centres and inadequate subspecialty coverage in nontrauma hospitals. Air ambulance services have been shown to improve patient outcomes compared with ground transport in select circumstances. Our primary goal was to compare injuries, interventions and outcomes in patients transported by helicopter versus nonhelicopter transport. We performed a retrospective 10-year review of 14 440 patients transported to an urban Level 1 trauma centre by helicopter or by other means. We compared injury severity, interventions and mortality between the groups. Patients transported by helicopter had higher median injury severity scores (ISS), regardless of penetrating or blunt injury, and were more likely to have Glasgow Coma Scale scores less than 8, require airway control, receive blood transfusions and require admission to the intensive care unit or operating room than patients transported by other means. Helicopter transport was associated with reduced overall mortality (odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.33-0.39). Patients transported by other methods were more likely to die in the emergency department. The mean ISS, regardless of transport method, rose from 12.3 to 15.1 (p = 0.011) during our study period. Patients transported by helicopter to an urban trauma centre were more severely injured, required more interventions and had improved survival than those arriving by other means of transport.
    Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie 02/2014; 57(1):49-54. · 1.63 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aeromedical transport (AMT) is an effective but costly means of rescuing critically injured patients. Although studies have shown that it improves survival to hospital discharge compared with ground transportation, an efficient threshold or universal criteria for this mode of transport remains to be established. Herein, we examined the effect of implementing a Trauma Advisory Committee (TAC) initiative focused on reducing AMT overtriage (OT) rates. TAC outreach coordinators implemented a process improvement (PI) initiative and collected data prospectively from January 2007 to December 2011. OT was defined as patients who were airlifted from scene and later discharged from the emergency department. Serving as liaisons to surrounding counties, TAC outreach coordinators conducted quarterly PI meetings with local emergency medical service agencies. Patients were grouped into those who were airlifted from TAC counties versus counties outside TAC's jurisdiction (non-TAC). Standard statistical methods were used. From 2007 to 2011, 3,349 patients were airlifted from 30 counties, 1,427 (43%) from TAC counties and 1,922 (57%) from non-TAC counties. The OT rates from TAC counties declined compared with non-TAC counties each year and reached statistical significance in 2008 (17% vs. 23%, p < 0.05), 2009 (11% vs. 17%m p < 0.05), and 2011 (6% vs. 12%, p < 0.05). The reduction in OT continued over the study duration, with improvement in TAC counties compared with previous years. Implementation of a regional TAC PI initiative focused on OT issues led to a more efficient use of AMT. Prognostic study, level III; therapeutic study, level IV.
    The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. 07/2013; 75(1):92-6.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ABSTRACT Study objective: Aero medical crews offer an ad- vanced level of practice and rapid transport to definitive care; however, their efficacy remains unproven. Previous studies have used relatively small sample sizes or have been unable to ade- quately control the effect of other potentially influential variables. Here we explore the impact of aero medical response in patients with mod- erate to severe traumatic brain injury. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study using our coun- ty trauma registry. All patients with trauma injury, who referred to our emergency department by helicopter or car, were included. The impact of aeromedical response was determined using lo- gistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, mecha- nism, preadmission Glasgow Coma Scale score and Injury Severity Score. Finally, the aeromedi- cal patients undergoing field intubation were compared with ground patients undergoing emer- gency department (ED) intubation. Results: A total of 243 patients meeting all inclusion and exclusion criteria and with complete data sets were identified. Overall mortality was 25% in the air- and ground-transported cohorts, but out- comes were not significantly better for the aero- medical patients when adjusted for age, sex, me- chanism of injury, hypotension, Glasgow Coma Scale score, head Abbreviated Injury Score, and Injury Severity Score (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.60 to 2.25; P: 0001). Good outcomes (discharge to home, jail, psychiatric facility, rehabilitation, or leaving aga- inst medical advice) were also higher in aero- medical patients (adjusted OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.58; P: 0001). Conclusion: Here we analyze a large database of patients with moderate to se- vere traumatic brain injury. Aeromedical respon- se appears to yield no significantly improved outcomes after adjustment for multiple influen- tial factors in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.
    Health 05/2013; 5(5):903-907. · 2.10 Impact Factor