A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry.

Neurosciences Research Institute, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
British Journal of Ophthalmology (Impact Factor: 2.81). 05/2002; 86(4):458-62.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A new commercially available device (IOLMaster, Zeiss Instruments) provides high resolution non-contact measurements of axial length (using partial coherent interferometry), anterior chamber depth, and corneal radius (using image analysis). The study evaluates the validity and repeatability of these measurements and compares the findings with those obtained from instrumentation currently used in clinical practice.
Measurements were taken on 52 subjects (104 eyes) aged 18-40 years with a range of mean spherical refractive error from +7.0 D to -9.50 D. IOLMaster measurements of anterior chamber depth and axial length were compared with A-scan applanation ultrasonography (Storz Omega) and those for corneal radius with a Javal-Schiötz keratometer (Topcon) and an EyeSys corneal videokeratoscope.
Axial length: the difference between IOLMaster and ultrasound measures was insignificant (0.02 (SD 0.32) mm, p = 0.47) with no bias across the range sampled (22.40-27.99 mm). Anterior chamber depth: significantly shorter depths than ultrasound were found with the IOLMaster (-0.06 (0.25) mm, p <0.02) with no bias across the range sampled (2.85-4.40 mm). Corneal radius: IOLMaster measurements matched more closely those of the keratometer than those of the videokeratoscope (mean difference -0.03 v -0.06 mm respectively), but were more variable (95% confidence 0.13 v 0.07 mm). The repeatability of all the above IOLMaster biometric measures was found to be of a high order with no significant bias across the measurement ranges sampled.
The validity and repeatability of measurements provided by the IOLMaster will augment future studies in ocular biometry.

Download full-text


Available from: Jacinto Santodomingo, Jun 04, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose. To compare anterior corneal keratometry (K) measurements taken by a dual Scheimpflug analyzer and an auto kerato-refractometer. Methods. Sixty-four normal eyes underwent keratometric measurements with both devices. The repeatability of the auto kerato-refractometer measurements was assessed by calculating the coefficient of variation (COV). The interdevice agreement was evaluated using the Bland-Altman analysis, Pearson correlation coefficient, and paired two-tailed t-test. Results. The COV of the flat K and steep K measurements taken by the auto kerato-refractometer were 0.21% and 0.29%, respectively. There were no significant differences between the steep K and average K measurements for the Topcon and Galilei devices (P = 0.475, and P = 0.137, resp.). The Galilei flat K values were lower than those of the Topcon (P = 0.002). Both of the instruments showed good agreement for all anterior corneal keratometric values. There was a significant linear correlation between the Galilei and Topcon devices for the flat K (r = 0.989, P < 0.0001), steep K (r = 0.987, P < 0.0001), and average K values (r = 0.994, P < 0.0001). Conclusions. The anterior corneal flat keratometric values were not interchangeable between the Galilei and Topcon devices. However, the measurements of the two instruments showed significant linear correlation with each other.
    Journal of Ophthalmology 05/2014; 2014:140628. DOI:10.1155/2014/140628 · 1.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A comparative population-based cross-sectional study design was used to examine the prevalence of wavefront patterns in two different ethnic groups, and the relationship of these patterns with ocular biometrics and gender. The Shin-Nippon SRW5000 open field autorefractor, the Wavefront Analysis Supported Customized Ablation (WASCA) wavefront analyser and the IOLMaster were used to determine wavefront aberrations, mean spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error and axial length (AL). Seventy-four eyes from 74 young healthy subjects (44 British Asians, 30 Caucasians; 36 men, 38 women; mean age 22.51 +/- 3.89 years) with mean SE averaging -1.90 +/- 2.76 D (range -10.88 to +2.19 D) were examined. Relationships between ethnicity, gender, AL and SE, against the wavefront high-order root mean square, and aberration components up to the fifth order, were assessed by using multiple regression and correlation analysis. AL on its own accounted for 4.7% of the variance in trefoil component Z(-3)(3) (F(1,72) = 4.602; p = 0.035), 13.7% of coma component Z(1)(3) (F(1,72) = 12.536; p = 0.001), 6.1% of trefoil component Z(3)(3) (F(1,72) = 5.705; p = 0.020) and 9.8% of coefficient Z(-2)(4) (F(1,72) = 8.908; p = 0.004). A significant model emerged (F(2,71) = 6.164; p = 0.003) for ethnicity and axial length, accounting for 12.4% of variance in primary spherical aberration with ethnicity accounting for 8.4% of that variance. For Caucasian subjects, a significant correlation was found between axial length and (Pearson's correlation coefficient -0.500; p = 0.005) and Z(0)(4) (Pearson's correlation coefficient -0.423; p = 0.020). For British Asian subjects, AL was only correlated with coefficient Z(-2)(4) (Pearson's correlation coefficient -0.358; p = 0.017). Ethnicity is a factor to be considered in the variability of wavefront aberration, particularly spherical aberration. Relationship between AL and wavefront aberrations seems to vary between ethnicities. If higher order aberrations play a role in the emmetropization process, this may be different for different populations.
    Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 12/2008; 28(6):532-7. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00592.x · 2.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study determined to assess the degree of agreement between anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements obtained using three different devices and to analyse the relationship between ACD and spherical equivalent (SE) refraction. In this cross-sectional study, 42 eyes of 42 patients with a mean SE of - 4.69 +/- 4.61 D (range 0.00 D to - 14.88 D) were analysed. Measurements of ACD between the corneal epithelium and the anterior surface of the crystalline lens, obtained using the Pentacam, Orbscan IIz and IOLMaster, were compared. The relationships between SE and ACD measurements obtained with different devices were also investigated. The results were analysed using Bland-Altman analyses, single-sample t-test and Pearson's correlation test. Orbscan ACD measurements were an average of 0.05 mm less than Pentacam measurements (p = 0.01). IOLMaster measurements were an average of 0.06 mm less than Orbscan measurements (p < 0.001). None of the ACD values measured by any of the devices were correlated with increasing SE (p > 0.05 for all). There was a weak positive correlation between SE and the difference in ACD measurements with Pentacam and Orbscan (p = 0.04); however, the differences between Pentacam and IOLMaster ACD measurements and Orbscan and IOLMaster ACD measurements seemed to be independent of SE (p = 0.17 and p = 0.54, respectively). The ACD in clinically normal eyes is measured differently by various non-ultrasonic devices. However, the observed mean error between these modalities is too small to create any noticeable difference in refractive outcome. No significant relationship was found between SE and ACD measurements obtained by Pentacam, Orbscan or IOLMaster.
    Acta ophthalmologica 09/2008; 87(4):386-91. DOI:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01278.x · 2.51 Impact Factor