Article

Clinical responses to undiluted and diluted smallpox vaccine

Department of Medicine, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA.
New England Journal of Medicine (Impact Factor: 54.42). 05/2002; 346(17):1265-74. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa020534
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the potential to increase the supply of smallpox vaccine (vaccinia virus), we compared the response to vaccination with 10(8.1), 10(7.2), and 10(7.0) plaque-forming units (pfu) of vaccinia virus per milliliter.
In this randomized, single-blind, prospective study, 680 adults who had not been previously immunized were inoculated intradermally with undiluted vaccine (mean titer, 10(8.1) pfu per milliliter), a 1:5 dilution, or a 1:10 dilution of vaccinia virus with use of a bifurcated needle, and the site was covered with a semipermeable dressing. Subjects were monitored for vesicle formation (an indicator of the success of vaccination) and adverse events for 56 days after immunization.
Success rates did not differ significantly among the groups and ranged from 97.1 to 99.1 percent after the first vaccination. Both the undiluted and diluted vaccines were reactogenic. In addition to the formation of pustules, common adverse events included the formation of satellite lesions, regional lymphadenopathy, fever, headache, nausea, muscle aches, fatigue, and chills consistent with the presence of an acute viral illness. Generalized and localized rashes, including two cases of erythema multiforme, were also observed.
When given by a bifurcated needle, vaccinia virus vaccine can be diluted to a titer as low as 10(7.0) pfu per milliliter (approximately 10,000 pfu per dose) and induce local viral replication and vesicle formation in more than 97 percent of persons.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
110 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Following vaccination with traditional smallpox vaccines or after exposure to vaccinated individuals, subjects with atopic dermatitis (AD) can develop eczema vaccinatum, a severe disease with disseminated eruption of pustular contagious lesions. Alternative smallpox vaccines with an improved safety profile would address this unmet medical need. Methods: An open-label controlled Phase I clinical trial was conducted to investigate the safety and immunogenicity of modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) in 15 healthy subjects compared to 45 subjects with either mild allergic rhinitis, a history of AD or presenting with mild active AD. MVA was given (Week 0 and 4) by a subcutaneous injection during a 28-week observation period. Results: No serious adverse event was reported and vaccinations with MVA did not lead to any clinically relevant skin reactions in AD subjects. Unsolicited administration site reactions did not show any trends compared to the healthy subject group. The majority of adverse reactions were mild to moderate, and all reactions were transient and resolved without intervention. The majority of vaccinees had seroconverted by ELISA (80-93%) and PRNT (69-79%) already two weeks after the first vaccination, increasing to 100% after the second immunization, with peak GMT above 1000 and 145 for ELISA and PRNT, respectively. Conclusions: MVA was equally well tolerated and immunogenic in all enrolled subjects with mild to moderate pain and redness at the injection site being the most frequent adverse reactions. There were no differences in the safety or immunogenicity profile of MVA in healthy subjects or those with AD or allergic rhinitis. The study has confirmed MVA as a promising smallpox vaccine candidate and demonstrated in a small study population that the vaccine has a similar safety and immunogenicity profile in healthy subjects and people with active AD. Clinical trials registration: NCT00189917.
    Vaccine 08/2014; 32(43). DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.08.022 · 3.49 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Smallpox vaccine based on live, replicating vaccinia virus (VACV) is associated with several potentially serious and deadly complications. Consequently, a new generation of vaccine based on non-replicating Modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) has been under clinical development. MVA seems to induce good immune responses in blood tests, but it is impossible to test its efficacy in vivo in human. One of the serious complications of the replicating vaccine is eczema vaccinatum (EV) occurring in individuals with atopic dermatitis (AD), thus excluding them from all preventive vaccination schemes. In this study, we first characterized and compared development of eczema vaccinatum in different mouse strains. Nc/Nga, Balb/c and C57Bl/6J mice were epicutaneously sensitized with ovalbumin (OVA) or saline control to induce signs of atopic dermatitis and subsequently trans-dermally (t.d.) immunized with VACV strain Western Reserve (WR). Large primary lesions occurred in both mock- and OVA-sensitized Nc/Nga mice, while they remained small in Balb/c and C57Bl/6J mice. Satellite lesions developed in both mock- and OVA-sensitized Nc/Nga and in OVA-sensitized Balb/c mice with the rate 40-50%. Presence of mastocytes and eosinophils was the highest in Nc/Nga mice. Consequently, we have chosen Nc/Nga mice as a model of AD/EV and tested efficacy of MVA and Dryvax vaccinations against a lethal intra-nasal (i.n.) challenge with WR, the surrogate of smallpox. Inoculation of MVA intra-muscularly (i.m.) or t.d. resulted in no lesions, while inoculation of Dryvax t.d. yielded large primary and many satellite lesions similar to WR. Eighty three and 92% of mice vaccinated with a single dose of MVA i.m. or t.d., respectively, survived a lethal i.n. challenge with WR without any serious illness, while all Dryvax-vaccinated animals survived. This is the first formal prove of protective immunity against a lethal poxvirus challenge induced by vaccination with MVA in an atopic organism.
    PLoS ONE 12/2014; 9(12):e114374. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0114374 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Smallpox was eradicated 34 years ago due to the success of the smallpox vaccine; yet, the vaccine continues to be studied because of its importance in responding to potential biological warfare and the adverse events associated with current smallpox vaccines. Interindividual variations in vaccine response are observed and are, in part, due to genetic variation. In some cases, these varying responses lead to adverse events, which occur at a relatively high rate for the smallpox vaccine compared with other vaccines. Here, we aim to summarize the cytokine responses associated with smallpox vaccine response to date. Along with a description of each of these cytokines, we describe the genetic and adverse event data associated with cytokine responses to smallpox vaccination.
    Immunotherapy 10/2014; 6(10):1097-112. DOI:10.2217/imt.14.72 · 2.39 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
18 Downloads
Available from
Jun 6, 2014