Article

Staging of gastric cancer: a study with spiral computed tomography, ultrasonography, laparoscopy, and laparoscopic ultrasonography.

Department of Surgery, University of Turku, Finland.
Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques (Impact Factor: 0.88). 05/2002; 12(2):77-81.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In this study, we evaluated and compared the value of spiral computed tomography, transabdominal ultrasonography, laparoscopy, and laparoscopic ultrasonography in staging gastric cancer in 37 patients; there was a special interest in the additional information provided by laparoscopic ultrasonography. Although laparoscopy was unreliable or hindered by adhesions in 11% of the patients, the benefit of laparoscopy for staging was evident especially for the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis that was missed by the other diagnostic modalities. Laparoscopic ultrasonography did not change the stage of the disease nor the decision whether to proceed with laparotomy for any of the patients. The decision whether to proceed with laparotomy was correctly predicted in 95% of the cases.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
35 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Multiorgan resection of locally advanced gastric cancer has previously been associated with increased morbidity. This study was performed to determine the actual prevalence of pathologic T4 disease in multiorgan gastric resection specimens excised for presumed clinical T4 gastric cancer. A prospective oncology database was queried to identify gastric cancer patients who underwent en bloc multiorgan resection for clinical T4 lesions. Four hundred eighteen patients with gastric cancer underwent gastrectomy between 1990 and 2002. Multiorgan resection was performed in 21 of 418 (5%) patients. Multiorgan resection was not associated with a significant increase in morbidity or mortality. Pathologically confirmed T4 disease was present in only 8 of 21 (38%) patients; the pathologic T stage in all remaining patients was T3 (13 [62%]). Fifteen patients were evaluated by preoperative computed tomography scan. Preoperative computed tomography was inaccurate in assessing T4 lesions, with a positive predictive value of only 50%. Multiorgan resection was safely performed in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Pathologic T4 disease was present in only one third of multiorgan resections performed for en bloc excision of locally advanced gastric cancer. Improved methods for intraoperative assessment of disease extension to adjacent viscera should be investigated.
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 12/2004; 8(7):899-902. · 2.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The role of staging laparoscopy in gastric cancers is evaluated in this study with special consideration of the extensive further development of the imaging procedures. The study showed that staging laparoscopy improves the accuracy of preoperative staging particularly in regard to peritoneal seeding and the serosal infiltration. In comparison to histology it was possible to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the staging laparoscopy itself. However the study also showed that the effect of the staging laparoscopy on therapeutic strategy decreases over the years, while the accuracy of the imaging procedures increases. In order to optimize the use of staging laparoscopy in the future, a reliable selection algorithm was developed, which is able to estimate the expected benefit of a staging laparoscopy.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to clarify the usefulness of staging laparoscopy for planning the treatment strategy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. This was a retrospective study of patients with gastric cancer who underwent staging laparoscopy. The patients were divided into three groups according to the presence/absence of peritoneal metastasis (P) and positive peritoneal cytology (CY): P negative (0) CY0, P0CY positive (1), and P1CY1. The treatment strategy after staging laparoscopy was as follows: (1) surgery for the P0CY0 group, (2) surgery with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for the P0CY1 group, and (3) chemotherapy for the P1CY1 group. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and statistical differences were analyzed by the log-rank test. Thirty-four patients were included in this study: 11 in the P0CY0 group, 13 in the P0CY1 group, and 10 in the P1CY1 group. A gastrectomy was done in 11, 10, and no patients, respectively. The survival rate of the P0CY0 patients was significantly better than that of the P0CY1 or P1CY1 patients (P = 0.0106 and 0.0031, respectively). Staging laparoscopy is useful for planning the treatment strategy and estimating the prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer.
    Surgery Today 01/2010; 40(2):119-24. · 0.96 Impact Factor