Article

Flexural strength of In-Ceram alumina and In-Ceram zirconia core materials.

Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences, Division of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1078, USA.
The International journal of prosthodontics (Impact Factor: 1.19). 01/2002; 15(2):183-8.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The study compared the flexural strength of In-Ceram alumina and In-Ceram zirconia systems. The probability of failure of the two glass-infiltrated ceramic core materials was analyzed with and without lamination with Vitadur-alpha porcelain.
Ten uniform beams of core materials as well as 10 beams of laminated core materials were fabricated for In-Ceram alumina and In-Ceram zirconia. The samples were subjected to three-point bending tests. Flexural strength for both ceramic core materials was determined with and without their porcelain laminations. The strength data were analyzed using the Weibull method. Modes of failure for both systems were determined using scanning electron micrography.
The strength of the In-Ceram zirconia system was significantly higher than In-Ceram alumina when comparing their core materials with and without porcelain lamination. The failure mode for both systems was predominantly transgranular fracture of alumina platelets.
In-Ceram zirconia demonstrated higher flexural strength than In-Ceram alumina.

1 Bookmark
 · 
209 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Metal ceramic restorations were considered the gold standard as reliable materials. Increasing demand for esthetics supported the commercialization of new metal free restorations. A growing demand is rising for zirconia prostheses. Peer-reviewed articles published till July 2013 were identified through a Medline (Pubmed and Elsevier). Emphasizing was made on zirconia properties and applications. Zirconia materials are able to withstand posterior physiologic loads. Although zirconia cores are considered as reliable materials, these restorations are not problem free.
    The Open Dentistry Journal 04/2014; 8:33-42.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ceramics are widely used as indirect restorative materials in dentistry because of their high biocompatibility and pleasing aesthetics. The objective is to review the state of the arts of CAD/CAM all-ceramic biomaterials.
    Journal of Prosthodontic Research 08/2014;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the influence of cementation on fracture load of anterior crowns made of CAD/CAM-resin-blocks (ART), leucite-reinforced glass-ceramics (LRG), lithium disilicate ceramics (LIT), veneered zirconia (ZRO) and veneered alloy (DEG). Each crown group (n=15/subgroup) was cemented on the metal abutment as follows: i. using glass ionomer, ii. using self-adhesive resin cement, and iii. not cemented. Crowns were tested and analyzed with 2-way and 1-way ANOVA (Scheffé test), and Weibull statistics (p<0.05). Within LRG, self-adhesive cemented subgroup showed higher fracture load compared to other groups (p<0.001). Among DEG, lower results were measured for non-cemented crowns than for cemented (p<0.001). For ART, LIT and ZRO no influence of cementation was observed. For fracture load test methodology, metal ceramic crowns should be generally cemented. Glass-ceramic crowns should be cemented using adhesive cement. Cementation and cement type did not have an influence on the fracture load results for resin, zirconia or lithium disilicate crowns.
    Dental Materials Journal 11/2013; · 0.81 Impact Factor