Influence of driver nationality on the risk of causing vehicle collisions in Spain.

Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Journal of Epidemiology &amp Community Health (Impact Factor: 3.29). 06/2002; 56(5):394-8.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To estimate the association between driver nationality and the risk of causing a collision between vehicles in motion.
Retrospective, matched by collision, case-control study.
Collisions that occurred in Spain during the period from 1990 to 1999 were studied.
Responsible (case) and non-responsible (control) drivers identified in the databases of the Dirección General de Tráfico (General Traffic Directorate) who were involved in a collisions between two or more four wheeled vehicles in motion, in which only one of the drivers had committed a traffic violation.
Crude odds ratios (ORs) for the effect of driver nationality on the risk of causing a collision were significantly higher for foreign drivers than for Spanish drivers, and ranged from a minimum of 1.19 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.29) for Portuguese drivers to a maximum of 2.06 (1.88 to 2.27) for British drivers. Corresponding adjusted ORs were slightly lower, but were still significantly higher than 1 for all nationalities except Italian, Belgian, and American (USA). Adjusted ORs were usually higher for collisions that occurred in urban areas than on open roads.
Authorities responsible for traffic safety, and drivers in general, should consider foreign drivers in Spain at particularly high risk for causing collisions, especially in urban areas.


Available from: JD Luna, May 26, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The goal is to comprehensively examine the state-of-the-art applications and methodological development of quasi-induced exposure and consequently pinpoint the future research directions in terms of implementation guidelines, limitations, and validity tests. The paper conducts a comprehensive review on approximately 45 published papers relevant to quasi-induced exposure regarding four key topics of interest: applications, responsibility assignment, validation of assumptions, and methodological development. Specific findings include that: (1) there is no systematic data screening procedure in place and how the eliminated crash data will impact the responsibility assignment is generally unknown; (2) there is a lack of necessary efforts to assess the validity of assumptions prior to its application and the validation efforts are mostly restricted to the aggregated levels due to the limited availability of exposure truth; and (3) there is a deficiency of quantitative analyses to evaluate the magnitude and directions of bias as a result of injury risks and crash avoidance ability. The paper points out the future research directions and insights in terms of the validity tests and implementation guidelines.
    Accident; analysis and prevention 12/2013; 65C:36-46. DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2013.12.008 · 1.65 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Drivers outside their country of residence are at a safety disadvantage when compared to native counterparts. This research aimed to (1) investigate if out-of-state drivers in the United States experienced the same vulnerabilities as foreign drivers, and (2) examine the relations of out-of-state crashes to various human and environmental factors. Crash data from Florida, Maine, Minnesota, and Nevada was analyzed to model fault using logistic regressions. Univariate regressions showed that out-of-state drivers had increased odds of fault, ranging from 17% to 92%, for a single-vehicle crash compared to in-state drivers in all states except Florida, where there was no difference between groups. Odds were elevated for out-of-state drivers in two-vehicle crashes by 3% to 19% in all states except Florida and Minnesota, where, again, there was no difference between groups. Human and environmental factors such as age, sex, driving conditions, and seasons were examined with multivariate regressions for in- and out-of-state groups separately, and their odds ratios were compared. For single-vehicle crashes age, sex, road grade, surface condition, light conditions, and day of week were factors that increased at least one of the two groups’ odds of fault in all states. Sex, surface condition, and light conditions increased the odds of fault for at least one of the groups in two-vehicle crashes in all four states. Factors that consistently increased odds of fault for both single- and two-vehicle crashes were males, non-vehicle owners, curves, and inclement weather. Although there were several factors in each state that increased odds of fault for out-of-state drivers, no factors consistently increased odds of fault for out-of-state drivers across all four states.
    Accident Analysis & Prevention 11/2014; 72:32–43. DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2014.06.012 · 1.87 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: RESUMEN El número de víctimas en accidentes de tráfico se ha descompuesto tradicionalmente en tres dimensiones: exposición; riesgo de accidente, definido como el número de accidentes por unidad de exposición; y riesgo de lesión, definido como el número de víctimas por cada accidente. Hasta el momento, el conocimiento sobre los factores que influyen sobre el riesgo de accidente es deficiente, un hecho relacionado con la extraordinaria dificultad para obtener información sobre la exposición de distintos grupos de usuarios y vehículos. Existe consenso en que la medida idónea de exposición es la distancia recorrida. Sin embargo, las carencias de los actuales sistemas de información han llevado a la utilización de aproximaciones como el parque de vehículos o el censo de conductores. Una alternativa es la utilización de medidas indirectas de exposición, a las que pertenecen los denominados métodos de exposición cuasi inducida. Estas medidas se caracterizan por ser derivadas de la propia base de accidentes, mediante la búsqueda de tipos de accidentes cuyo riesgo de ocurrencia no sea influido por el atributo de estudio (edad del conductor, año de matriculación del vehículo...). Esta ponencia discute las hipótesis básicas de los métodos de medida indirecta de exposición, y analiza la forma en que los sesgos de estimación pueden ser minimizados. Asimismo, se presenta una aplicación de los principios discutidos al análisis de la influencia de la antigüedad de un turismo sobre su riesgo de accidente.