Article

Hispanic client-case manager matching: differences in outcomes and service use in a program for homeless persons with severe mental illness.

Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Division of Health Policy and Administration, 60 College Street, P. O. Box 208034, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8034, USA.
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease (Impact Factor: 1.81). 06/2002; 190(5):315-23. DOI: 10.1097/00005053-200205000-00008
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Mental health professionals have responded to ethnic and racial disparities in mental health care by advocating increasing cultural relevancy in treatment. A central component of cultural relevancy is ethnic and racial pairing of clients and providers. This study examined the effects of client-case manager ethnic and racial matching among white and Hispanic clients who received assertive community treatment in the Access to Community Care and Effective Services and Supports Program. Twelve-month outcomes and service use were examined among 242 Hispanic and 2333 white clients seen in the first 3 years of the program. Analysis of covariance was used to evaluate the association of client-case manager ethnic and racial matching with changes in health status and service use from baseline to 12 months after program entry. At baseline, Hispanics had more serious problems than whites on several measures of psychiatric and substance abuse domains, and they also showed less improvement than whites over the next year on several measures of psychiatric status and service use. One significant association with ethnic matching was found: when treated by a Hispanic clinician, Hispanic clients showed less improvement in symptoms of psychosis. These results do not support the hypothesis that ethnic and racial matching improves outcomes or service use. Several explanations are offered for the results.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
54 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study, which represents the second part of a two-part case study, is to develop a conceptual model that explains the multiple organizational, staff, and client factors that contribute to the creation of treatment outcomes for African American clients seeking services from community mental health agencies (CMHAs). Method: An agency identified in the first part of the case study by the authors (Larrison et al., 2004) as achieving similar positive treatment outcomes for African American and white clients is further examined in an attempt to understand the organizational and staff influence on these outcomes. A purposeful sample of staff and African American clients were asked to describe the agency's organizational climate and how that climate shaped the work of staff and the outcomes of treatment for African American clients. Both quantitative and qualitative descriptive data were collected and analyzed in an effort to develop an accurate understanding of how the agency created treatment outcomes for African American clients. Findings: The conceptual model developed suggests that organizational factors mediate the relationship between staff and clients. In particular, we posited that the high levels of involvement with clients, task orientation towards positive outcomes for all clients, clarity of tasks and goals, innovative interventions, and high levels of physical comfort at CMHAs helps to minimize disparities in treatment outcomes for African American clients.
    Administration in Social Work 06/2008; 32(3):111-138. · 0.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Racial disparities in mental health outcomes have been widely documented in non-institutionalized community psychiatric samples, but few studies have specifically examined the effects of race among individuals with the most severe mental illnesses. A sample of 925 individuals hospitalized for severe mental illness were followed for a year after hospital discharge to examine the presence of disparities in mental health outcomes between African American and White individuals diagnosed with a severe psychiatric condition. Results from a series of individual growth curve models indicated that African American individuals with severe mental illness experienced significantly less improvement in global functioning, activation and anergia symptoms, and were less likely to return to work in the year following hospitalization. Racial disparities persisted after adjustment for sociodemographic and diagnostic confounders, and were largely consistent across gender, socioeconomic status, and psychiatric diagnosis. Implications for social work research and practice with minorities with severe mental illness are discussed.
    Social work research 03/2012; 36(1):41-52. · 0.88 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
115 Downloads
Available from
Jun 3, 2014