Article

Image guided surgery of paranasal sinuses and anterior skull base--five years experience with the InstaTrak-System.

ENT Department, University Medical School, Graz, Austria.
Rhinology (Impact Factor: 2.78). 04/2002; 40(1):1-9.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We report on our experience with navigational tools in paranasal sinus and anterior skull base surgery, especially with electromagnetic guidance systems. During the last five years we operated over 80 selected cases with the InstaTrak system from VTI (Lawrence, MS, USA). Applicability and user friendliness were explored. The InstaTrak 3500 employs a Sun Workstation and is a frameless and free-arm and navigation system. Two different suction devices, used as sensors (receivers), and one transmitter are interconnected to this workstation. The position of the tip of the aspirator is displayed as a pair of crosshairs on the screen in axial, coronal and sagittal planes of the patient's CT-scan on the computerscreen online. Our results showed high accuracy-level, usually better than one millimeter and a setup-time less than ten minutes, on average. No additional personnel is required in the OR. We believe that the system enhances efficacy in selected cases like revision surgery, tumor surgery or difficult anterior skull base surgery. However, one should consider that medicolegal responsibility stays always with the surgeon and not with any navigation system.

1 Follower
 · 
166 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Image-guided navigation (IGN) systems provide automation support of intra-operative information analysis and decision-making for surgeons. Previous research showed that navigated-control (NC) systems which represent high levels of decision-support and directly intervene in surgeons' workflow provide benefits with respect to patient safety and surgeons' physiological stress but also involve several cost effects (e.g. prolonged surgery duration, reduced secondary-task performance). It was hypothesised that less automated distance-control (DC) systems would provide a better solution in terms of human performance consequences. N = 18 surgeons performed a simulated mastoidectomy with NC, DC and without IGN assistance. Effects on surgical performance, physiological effort, workload and situation awareness (SA) were compared. As expected, DC technology had the same benefits as the NC system but also led to less unwanted side effects on surgery duration, subjective workload and SA. This suggests that IGN systems just providing information analysis support are overall more beneficial than higher automated decision-support.
    Ergonomics 10/2014; 58(3):1-11. DOI:10.1080/00140139.2014.970588 · 1.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Das Ziel der Arbeit liegt in der Evaluation eines Navigationssystems (Navibase) für die HNO-Chirurgie. Dafür wurde eine neuartige Methodik zur Beurteilung chirurgischer und ergonomischer Systemeigenschaften entwickelt.Die Auswertung basiert auf 102 HNO-chirurgischen Anwendungen, davon 89 funktionelle endoskopische Nasennebenhöhlenoperationen (FESS). Die Einschätzung der chirurgischen und ergonomischen Leistungsspezifika erfolgte durch 7 HNO-Chirurgen. Um die chirurgischen Systemeigenschaften einzuschätzen, wurde der ,,level of quality“ (LOQ) bestimmt. Er vergleicht auf einer Skala von 0–100 und einem Mittelwert von 50 die vorhandenen A-priori-Informationen des Chirurgen mit denen des Navigationssystems und setzt sie in eine Beziehung zur klinischen Konsequenz.Bei der Evaluation der chirurgischen Systemeigenschaften ergab sich eine durchschnittliche Bewertung der Qualität der Information als LOQ von 63,59. Knapp jede 2. Anwendung des Navigationssystems (47,9%) führte im Durchschnitt zu einer Änderung der chirurgischen Strategie. Eine Erweiterung der Indikation des endonasalen Zugangs durch den Einsatz des Navigationssystems wurde in 7 von 102 Fällen (6,8%) angegeben. Das Gesamtvertrauen zeigt eine durchschnittliche Bewertung von 3,35. Die wirtschaftliche Bewertung ergab einen durchschnittlichen Mehraufwand von 1,35 min pro Fall.Die Gesamteinschätzung des Systems vermittelt anwendungsrelevante Informationen über die technischen Details hinaus und erlaubt eine Vergleichbarkeit zwischen verschiedenen Assistenzsystemen.
    HNO 01/2006; 54(12). · 0.54 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Object tracking is a key enabling technology in the context of computer-assisted medical interventions. Allowing the continuous localization of medical instruments and patient anatomy, it is a prerequisite for providing instrument guidance to subsurface anatomical structures. The only widely used technique that enables real-time tracking of small objects without lineof- sight restrictions is electromagnetic (EM) tracking. While EM tracking has been the subject of many research efforts, clinical applications have been slow to emerge. The aim of this review paper is therefore to provide insight into the future potential and limitations of EM tracking for medical use. We describe the basic working principles of EM tracking systems, list the main sources of error, and summarize the published studies on tracking accuracy, precision and robustness along with the corresponding validation protocols proposed. State-of-the-art approaches to error compensation are also reviewed in depth. Finally, an overview of the clinical applications addressed with EM tracking is given. Throughout the paper, we report not only on scientific progress, but also provide a review on commercial systems. Given the continuous debate on the applicability of EM tracking in medicine, this paper provides a timely overview of the state-of-the-art in the field.
    IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 05/2014; DOI:10.1109/TMI.2014.2321777 · 3.80 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
22 Downloads
Available from
May 23, 2014