Article

Developments in cognitive neuroscience: I. Conflict, compromise, and connectionism

Department of Psychology, Center for Anxiety and Related Disorders, Boston University, MA 02215, USA.
Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association (Impact Factor: 0.79). 02/2002; 50(1):53-98. DOI: 10.1177/00030651020500011501
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The strength of psychoanalysis has always been its understanding of affect and motivation. Contemporary developments in cognitive neuroscience offer possibilities of integrating sophisticated, experimentally informed models of thought and memory with an understanding of dynamically and clinically meaningful processes. Aspects of contemporary theory and research in cognitive neuroscience are integrated with psychoanalytic theory and technique, particularly theories of conflict and compromise. After a description of evolving models of the mind in cognitive neuroscience, several issues relevant to psychoanalytic theory and practice are addressed. These include the nature of representations, the interaction of cognition and affect, and the mechanisms by which the mind unconsciously forges compromise solutions that best fit multiple cognitive and affective-motivational constraints.

1 Follower
 · 
73 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The study of unconscious processes has always been central to psychoanalytically oriented psychologists. Within the past 3 decades, social and cognitive psychologists also have begun investigating unconscious processes. These investigators have focused on nonconflictual and unmotivated unconscious processes, which they termed implicit and which we call the “normative” unconscious. These processes play an important role in guiding individuals’ behavior but have been somewhat underemphasized in psychoanalytic circles. In this paper, we review 5 implicit processes—attribution, implicit memory, implicit learning, affective salience, and automaticity, none of which are motivated by conflict, defense, or deprivation. Nevertheless, these processes operate in both patients and therapists, including in the treatment room. We describe the operation of the normative unconscious, review some advances in the field, and discuss the clinical implications of these processes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved)
    Psychoanalytic Psychology 01/2014; 31(1):100. DOI:10.1037/a0035372 · 0.83 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Psychoanalytic research has flourished in recent years, yet so has animosity toward it. This curious state of affairs has led to a divergence of opinions in a professional community that is demanding more (and more rigorous) evidence regarding treatment efficacy. In this article, we briefly review the ways in which psychoanalytically oriented research has served to strengthen psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic treatments in the professional community. We discuss ways in which this research has been devalued within some psychoanalytic circles and suggest that such efforts can be considered as a sadomasochistic enactment that impedes the advancement of the psychoanalytic endeavor. We close by offering strategies for how to overcome these negative ideas and actions so that psychoanalytic ideas will continue to gain traction in contemporary psychiatry and psychology.
    Psychoanalytic Inquiry 01/2015; 35(sup1):185-195. DOI:10.1080/07351690.2015.987604 · 0.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Resumen: en el presente trabajo a partir de una perspectiva de integración cerebro/mente, el autor, estudia los cambios posibles que la psicoterapia psicoanalítica puede producir desde el punto de vista neurobiológico. Se consideran modelos de interacción para tener en cuenta a la psicoterapia psicoanalítica como un tratamiento psicobiológico Por medio del estudio de procesos neurofisiológicos de plasticidad cerebral, facilitación sináptica y potenciación a largo plazo en interacción con modelos psicoanalíticos basados en la teoría de la transferencia, el modelo evolutivo de M. Mahler (60), los procesos de attachment de acuerdo a ideas de Bowlby (10, 11), junto con los aportes de autores como Winnicott (80), Alexander (2, 3, 4) y Kohut (51), se puede llegar a la idea de la psicoterapia psicoanalítica como un ambiente enriquecido que induce cambios en áreas corticales y subcorticales relacionadas con el procesamiento de afectos y memoria que puede conducir a mayor grado de integración del si-mismo, de la relación con los objetos significativos en la vida del paciente y de la experiencia afectiva (68,69). Objetivos El objetivo de este trabajo es estudiar los cambios neurobiológicos producidos por la psicoterapia psicoanalítica en el marco de una perspectiva de integración. La tesis a considerar es que existe una falsa dicotomía, en parte dentro del psicoanálisis y ciertas ramas de la psiquiatría, derivada del modelo cartesiano dualista de la mente, entre tratamientos predominantemente "psicológicos" y aquellos "biológicos" que emplean fundamentalmente psicofármacos (28, 29). Intentaré demostrar que el tratamiento psicoanalítico es de alguna manera "psicobiológico". Con el fin de cumplir con estos objetivos, en primer lugar mencionaré un marco histórico a partir de ideas de Freud que me han parecido útiles de acuerdo a ciertos conocimientos actuales en neurociencia. Luego haré referencia a datos empíricos investigados hasta el momento que permiten considerar hipótesis acerca de la correlación entre psicoterapia psicoanalítica y cambios cerebrales. Finalmente consideraré modelos teóricos desde un enfoque neurobiológico y otro psicoanalítico para comprender la correlación terapia analítica / c ambios cerebrales. Como integración final mencionaré los posibles mecanismos por los cuales actúa la psicoterapia psicoanalítica a fin de producir los cambios mencionados.