Efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with IgG monoclonal gammopathy and polyneuropathy
Tufts University, Бостон, Georgia, United States JAMA Neurology
(Impact Factor: 7.42).
06/2002; 59(5):766-72. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.59.5.766
The optimal treatment of patients with neuropathy associated with IgG monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance is unknown. Plasma exchange has been shown to be effective but alternative therapies have not been systematically evaluated.
To report our experience with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in patients with IgG monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance polyneuropathy.
Retrospective review of clinical and electrodiagnostic features of 20 consecutive patients treated with IVIG over an 8-year period.
Academic medical center.
Medical Research Council strength (maximum, 40 points) and sensory (maximum, 26 points) scores, modified Rankin Disability Scale score.
There were 14 men and 6 women (mean age, 65 years; age range, 36-82 years). The mean strength score was 35.6 points and the mean sensory score was 15.8 points prior to therapy. After IVIG therapy, the mean strength score increased by 1.1 points (P =.22) and the sensory score increased by 1.7 points (P =.11). Eight patients (40%) improved by 2 points or more in their motor or sensory score and 1 point or more in the modified Rankin Disability Scale score and were considered IVIG therapy responders. They had a shorter duration of symptoms (P =.03), numb hands (P =.02), and falling episodes (P =.02), and had greater proximal leg weakness (P =.02) compared with nonresponders. In IVIG therapy responders, the ulnar motor conduction velocity was slower, ulnar and peroneal distal motor latencies were prolonged, and the frequency of conduction block was higher (13 of 36 motor nerves in responders vs 6 of 53 in nonresponders, P =.008).
Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy was beneficial in 8 (40%) of our 20 patients with polyneuropathy and IgG monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Proximal leg weakness, short duration of symptoms, and demyelinating features on electrodiagnostic studies were associated with a response to IVIG therapy.
Available from: med.nyu.edu
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The association of neuropathy with monoclonal gammopathy has been known for several years, even if the nosological position of these neuropathies is still debated. Similarly unsettled is the pathogenetic role and diagnostic relevance in clinical practice of the antineural antibodies frequently associated with monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance of IgM isotype, as well as the most effective therapy (if any) to be used in these patients. Over the past 12 months these issues have been addressed in several papers whose results will be critically reviewed here.
Current Opinion in Neurology 11/2001; 14(5):615-20. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-444-52902-2.00025-4 · 5.31 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a chronic, acquired immune and inflammatory disorder of the peripheral nervous system. The classic form of the disorder is manifested by progressive or relapsing proximal or generalized limb weakness and areflexia, and usually easily recognized; it is the large number of regional and functional variants and variety of associated illnesses that pose a challenge to the clinician in practice. Similarly, laboratory and electromyography criteria have been developed to confirm the diagnosis; however, these various schemes are contrived because only 50% to 60% of patients with typical clinical features of CIDP fulfill these strict electrodiagnostic research criteria. Several studies have established the efficacy of immune therapies such as corticosteroids, plasma exchange, and intravenous immune globulin as the mainstay of treatment of CIDP, but these treatments might provide only short-term benefit. This review offers an approach to the evaluation and management of patients with CIDP and highlights the difficult clinical problems in those who do not respond or frequently relapse after treatment with standard therapies such as patients with CIDP and concomitant axonal loss, and the assessment of those with CIDP and concurrent diseases such as diabetes mellitus.
Journal of clinical neuromuscular disease 07/2003; 4(4):174-89. DOI:10.1097/00131402-200306000-00004
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The review concentrates on the use of clinical neurophysiology in peripheral nerve disorders covered in the present issue. It is pertinent to distinguish different types of involvement of fibers in diabetic neuropathy, including the involvement of small and large fibers, to outline the diagnostic criteria of inflammatory neuropathies, and to describe the spectrum of peripheral nerve pathophysiology in inherited neuropathies. Painful neuropathies represent a particular challenge to clinical neurophysiology since it is mainly small fibers, which are difficult to study, that are affected.
Electrodiagnostic studies have relevance in distinguishing neuropathies with different etiologies in diabetes mellitus, and different strategies and methods are necessary to study patients with autonomic and small-fiber involvement. The involvement of motor or sensory fibers, or both, and primary axonal or demyelinative pathology are important questions relating to immune-mediated neuropathies studied in the context of the specificity of antibodies against various neuronal and Schwann-cell structures. In hereditary neuropathy, electrophysiological studies are also used to distinguish axonal neuropathies from demyelinating neuropathies, though overlap and 'intermediate' patterns have become well recognized. In pain syndromes, conventional electrophysiological studies may give normal results if large fibers are not involved, and the use of autonomic measures in these situations has particular relevance.
The usefulness of electrodiagnostic measures depends on the clinical, diagnostic, or pathophysiological question involved, and the strategy employed should reflect the advantages and limitations of these methods. If adequate consideration is paid to these properties, then such studies have a central role in the diagnosis and adequate treatment of patients with neuromuscular disorders.
Current Opinion in Neurology 11/2003; 16(5):603-12. DOI:10.1097/01.wco.0000093104.34793.94 · 5.31 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.