Nosocomial central venous catheter infections among patients with different types of cancer.
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology (Impact Factor: 4.02). 06/2002; 23(5):234-5. DOI:10.1086/503461
- [show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Immunization is the most feasible method for preventing influenza. Vaccination against influenza is recommended for everyone 65 years of age and older and for persons less than 65 years of age who are at risk for developing complications of influenza. Immune correlates of protection have been established, and a global network is in place to monitor the appearance and circulation of antigenic variants of influenza viruses, as well as the appearance of novel subtypes of influenza A. Antigenic and genetic analyses of circulating viruses and testing of serum from vaccine recipients guide vaccine composition updates. The efficacy of influenza vaccines depends in part on the closeness of the antigenic match between the vaccine strain and the epidemic strain. Currently licensed influenza vaccines are trivalent, formalin-inactivated, egg-derived vaccines; their efficacy ranges from 70 to 90% in young, healthy populations when there is a close antigenic match between vaccine strains and epidemic strains. Development of intranasally administered alternative vaccines and improvement of the existing vaccine are areas of active research. A trivalent, ca live vaccine is the most promising LAIV candidate. In a field trial, efficacy rates of LAIV in young children were 96% against influenza A (H3N2) and 91% against influenza B. However, few data are available to compare this formulation of the trivalent ca live vaccine with the trivalent, inactivated vaccine. Influenza vaccine recommendations will most likely be revised on licensure of LAIV; each vaccine may offer distinct advantages in specific populations.Advances in Virus Research 02/1999; 54:349-73. · 2.84 Impact Factor
- Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 05/2000; 21(4):249-50. · 4.02 Impact Factor
- [show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Faced with unacceptably low and declining overall immunization compliance, as well as specific flu immunization compliance, the Executive Committee of a 32-person Air National Guard clinic asked the nursing service to devise a method of correcting these deficiencies as rapidly as possible and maintaining immunization compliance at a rate of 90% or better of the total patient population of approximately 1,100 full-time and Guard personnel for whom the clinic was responsible. The concept of a mobile immunization team was devised and validated over a 2-year interval. In order to successfully develop and implement this concept, command emphasis and a high level of cooperation from both clinic personnel and the Unit Commanders involved was requested and received. The make-up of the team, risk management, the timing and place of team visits, and record keeping were among the problems addressed and resolved. The mobile immunization team concept was a success, achieving excellent overall immunization compliance and outstanding compliance with the flu immunization program over a 2-year period.Military medicine 03/1991; 156(2):53-5. · 0.77 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.