Getting to the “truth”: Evaluating National Tobacco Countermarketing Campaigns

American Legacy Foundation, Washington, Washington, D.C., United States
American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 4.23). 07/2002; 92(6):901-7. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.92.6.901
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study examines how the American Legacy Foundation's "truth" campaign and Philip Morris's "Think. Don't Smoke" campaign have influenced youths' attitudes, beliefs, and intentions toward tobacco.
We analyzed 2 telephone surveys of 12- to 17-year-olds with multivariate logistic regressions: a baseline survey conducted before the launch of "truth" and a second survey 10 months into the "truth" campaign.
Exposure to "truth" countermarketing advertisements was consistently associated with an increase in anti-tobacco attitudes and beliefs, whereas exposure to Philip Morris advertisements generally was not. In addition, those exposed to Philip Morris advertisements were more likely to be open to the idea of smoking.
Whereas exposure to the "truth" campaign positively changed youths' attitudes toward tobacco, the Philip Morris campaign had a counterproductive influence.

Download full-text


Available from: Cheryl G Healton, Feb 16, 2014
  • Source
    • "Social responsibility ads often indicate the party who is or should be acting and the action required to resolve a social problem; for example, an ad may indicate a bank hires physically challenged persons or sponsors a consumer education program (Newberry 1989). Ads describing socially responsible behavior are most effective if they feature the ad sponsor's actions (Farrelly et al. 2002; Siegel and Biener 2000). Of course, social responsibility ads may suggest non-sponsors should alter their behaviors or merely broach the problem without suggesting a change agent. "
  • Source
    • "In public health, information campaigns have been used to promote safer sexual practices (Alstead et al., 1999), regular monitoring of health (Fender et al., 1999; Black et al., 2002), cessation of smoking (Siegel and Beiner, 2000; Farrelly et al., 2002), and reduction in transmission of infectious diseases (Preston, 1996). Nutrition labels on food products aim to motivate appropriate choice in one's diet (some relatively recent examples are Harnack and French, 2008; Downs et al., 2009; Wisdom et al., 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A national campaign of well testing through 2003 enabled households in rural Bangladesh to switch, at least for drinking, from high-arsenic wells to neighboring lower-arsenic wells. We study the well-switching dynamics over time by re-interviewing, in 2008, a randomly selected subset of households in the Araihazar region who had been interviewed in 2005. Contrary to concerns that the impact of arsenic information on switching behavior would erode over time, we find that not only was 2003-2005 switching highly persistent but also new switching by 2008 doubled the share of households at unsafe wells who had switched. The passage of time also had a cost: 22% of households did not recall test results by 2008. The loss of arsenic knowledge led to staying at unsafe wells and switching from safe wells. Our results support ongoing well testing for arsenic to reinforce this beneficial information.
    Environment and Development Economics 12/2013; 19(05):1-17. DOI:10.1017/S1355770X13000612 · 0.67 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Because youths aged 12–17 are at most risk for smoking initiation (Pierce, Choi, Gilpin, Farkas, & Merritt, 1996), TID campaigns have used " edgy " media tools to change youths' perception of the tobacco industry and intention to smoke (Farrelly, Davis, Haviland, Messeri, & Healton, 2005; Farrelly, Niederdeppe, & Yarsevich, 2003; Farrelly et al., 2002, 2005; Leatherdale, Sparks, & Kirsh, 2006). These campaigns have been shown to be increasingly effective in changing youth's attitudes against tobacco use (Stevens, 1998), and instituting anti-tobacco beliefs and intentions not to smoke (Cowell, Farrelly, Chou, & Vallone, 2009; Farrelly, Davis, Duke, & Messeri, 2009; Farrelly et al., 2002). Moreover , they have been associated with a decline in youth smoking prevalence , in combination with and independent of other tobacco control interventions (Bauer, Johnson, Hopkins, & Brooks, 2000; Biener, Harris, & Hamilton, 2000; Farrelly et al., 2005; Hersey et al., 2005; Pierce et al., 1998). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tobacco industry denormalization (TID) informs the public about the tobacco industry's role in the tobacco epidemic and is an important component of a comprehensive tobacco control strategy. Although TID beliefs have been noted in adult smokers and associated with intent to quit, research has not evaluated whether they are affected by smokers' level of nicotine dependence. The present article sought to concurrently examine how attitudes towards the tobacco industry and tobacco control groups may differ among smokers of varying levels of nicotine dependence. In addition, it evaluated how these attitudes and beliefs may be associated with smokers' intentions to reduce or quit smoking.
    Addictive behaviors 03/2013; 38(7):2273-2278. DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.03.004 · 2.44 Impact Factor
Show more