Rural elementary students', parents', and teachers' perceptions of bullying.

Department of Psychology, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 62901, USA.
American journal of health behavior (Impact Factor: 1.31). 07/2002; 26(4):266-77. DOI: 10.5993/AJHB.26.4.3
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To examine the prevalence and correlates of bullying in 7 rural elementary schools from students', parents', and teachers' perspectives.
Surveys were completed by 739 fourth, fifth, and sixth grade students, 367 parents, and 37 teachers.
Students tended to report higher prevalence of bullying than did parents or teachers, and their reports were associated with aggression, attitudes toward violence, and perceptions of school safety.
Bullying behavior is prevalent in rural elementary schools and is indicative of aggression and proviolence attitudes. Parents and teachers need to pay closer attention to bullying behavior among schoolchildren and to impart their knowledge to children in a comprehensive, coordinated manner.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bullying victimization is a common experience for adolescents. Past research documents that victims have more negative mental health outcomes, social relationships, and school experiences compared to their non-victimized classmates. However, this research is largely cross-sectional, often lacks youth living in rural areas, and does not explore the longitudinal burden that victimization places on adolescent development. Further, few researchers have examined bullying victimization using a dose–response model; the dose model posits that more exposure to a stimuli presents a greater impact. The current study examines how cumulative experiences of traditional and cyber victimization over a three year period are associated with the mental health, social relationships, and school experiences of 2246 middle and high school students in two low income, rural counties in the south. Regression analysis confirms that increased victimization was associated with more negative mental health functioning, social relationships, and school experiences. Implications are discussed.
    Children and Youth Services Review 09/2014; 44:256–264. · 1.27 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acts of violence have been increasing in recent years in the world and in Turkey. Reflections of these events are seen in schools. One of the most pervasive forms of school violence is bullying. The evidence indicates that school bullying has a variety of negative consequences for both bullies and victims. The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequencies and the types of bullying; the gender of the bullies; the places of the bullying and the individuals whom the victims talk about the bullying in peer groups with low socio economic status. During the study 295 pupils had been reached. According to the results of the study, there is a significant difference in some types of bullying in terms of gender. In addition that bullying exists in schools at low socio-economic status and it is important that the Ministry of National Education should consider school bullying as a serious problem, and that it has negative consequences on pupils' physical, social and emotional damage in terms of the victim. It means continuous and repetitive exposure to bullying behavior harms these children's psycho-social development, and therefore their well-being or life quality. Hence, effective bullying prevention and intervention training programs are needed. SUMMARY Purpose and significance: The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequencies and the types of bullying; the gender of the bullies; the places of the bullying and the individuals whom the victims talk about the bullying. Methods: The study presented used a total sample of 295 participants, (153 females and 142 males) primary school pupils attending 4th grade and 5th grade of the Aydınlıkevler and Mamak located in Ankara. The classification made by the State Institute of Statistics was used for the definition of the district at lower socio-economic level and the primary schools were selected by a simple random sampling method from public schools under the Ministry of National Education. Data were collected between December 2008 and January 2009. The questionnaire used in the study is composed of three parts. In the first part, students' socio-demographic characteristics, in the second part Questionnaire for the Type of Bullying Exposed, in the third part The Peer Interactions in Primary School Questionnaire (PIPS). Results: A total of 295 Turkish primary school pupils (153 girls and 142 boys) participated in the study. They were attending 4th (144) and 5th (151) grades in primary school in Ankara. At the time of the study, the mean age of the sample was 10.5 years (range: 9–13). 34.8% of their mothers' educational level was illiterate. More than half of their father's educational level was primary and secondary school. More than half of pupils' families (52.2%) were comprised of between two and four people. 55.9% of pupils have one-two siblings. According to the results of the study, there is a significant difference in some types of bullying in terms of gender. Of the 295 pupils, 33.9% having been bullied verbally, 32.9% were bullied physically, 29.2% were bullied emotionally, and 16.9% were bullied sexually, at least once during the academic year. Another result indicated that boys bully and they become bullied more than girls. Bullying takes place in school garden and the classroom most often. Victims declared that they generally talk about the bullying to teacher. Victim talk latest with counselor services. Discussion and Conclusions: Bullying is a serious problem in schools and is a matter of recent concern. At the present there is no policy at the central level to deal with bullying. In school, counselor services in sufficient. In addition there aren't social workers in school. It is expected that the results of this study will raise the awareness of students, teachers, school principals, and educational managers and parents to the problem.
  • International Journal of Mental Health Promotion. 11/2013; 16(1):42-52.