Article

Thinking styles and academic achievement among Filipino students.

College of Education, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines.
The Journal of Genetic Psychology (Impact Factor: 0.65). 07/2002; 163(2):149-63. DOI: 10.1080/00221320209598674
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The authors' objective in this study was to determine whether the precepts of R. J. Sternberg's (1988, 1997) theory of mental self-government apply to a non-Western culture. They administered R. J. Sternberg and R. K. Wagner's (1992) Thinking Styles Inventory, which is based on the theory of mental self-government, to 429 Filipino university students. The results of item analysis, scale intercorrelations, and factor analysis were consistent with the general provisions of the theory. Correlational analysis between thinking styles and grade point average showed that thinking styles are related to acade micachievement. The results are explained with respect to the concepts and practices of Philippine culture and schools and discussed in relation to the developmental assumptions of the theory of mental self-government.

9 Bookmarks
 · 
1,111 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study pioneered the investigation of the efficacy of the theory of mental self-government in a non-academic setting. Three hundred and thirty-three people from various business sectors in Guangzhou, PR China, volunteered to participate in the research. The participants responded to the Thinking Styles Inventory-Revised and to a range of questions concerning their actual and perceived work environments. Results indicated that the Thinking Styles Inventory-Revised is reliable and valid for assessing the thinking styles of the participants. Furthermore, the participants’ reported work environments statistically predicted their thinking styles. Results supported Sternberg’s claim that the theory of mental self-government is a general theory of styles that applies to both academic and non-academic settings. Implications of the findings are discussed for organizational psychologists, human resource management personnel, providers of management training and development, as well as for the ordinary workforce.
    Personality and Individual Differences 06/2005; 38(8):1915-1925. DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2004.11.009 · 1.86 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Soon after its emergence in the early 90s, emotional intelligence turned to a focal area of interest for a tremendous number of researchers from several neighboring disciplines, including SLA and applied linguistics. The fact that emotional intelligence has been given an immense deal of heed on the part of manifold interdisciplinary pedagogical areas is no question. Yet, a fleeting look through the partially neglected domains falling within the scope of EQ-oriented probes might help divulge the alleged dearth of studies on the ostensible linkages between emotional intelligence and the learners' general thought processes. To help bridge the seeming gap in this regard, the current study strived to investigate the liable go-togetherness between the subcomponents of Bar-On's EQ-i, as the principal means of measuring the learners' emotional intelligence level and three major subscales of Sternberg's thinking styles inventory (TSI). Subsequent to data collection through the afore-said scales, Pearson Product Moment Correlation was run as the major resource for data analysis. Though the findings of the study provided the researcher with an amalgam of varied correlations between several subscales of both tests, the gained upshots can be taken as evidence in favor of the researcher's posited assumption that there should be some sort of linkage between the individuals' mentalities and their level of emotional intelligence. In other words, the existence of myriad instances of significant correlation between the scores on three subscales of Sternberg's thinking styles inventory and those of Bar-On's EQ-i urges the researcher to conclude that manipulating the learners' thinking styles in an appropriate manner may contribute to heightening their emotional intelligence level.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purposes of this study were to explore the effects of thinking styles on science achievement and attitudes toward science class among Taiwanese elementary school students and to explore the differences between male and female students in their modes of thinking. Participants included 756 sixth-grade students from 28 classes in four elementary schools in Taiwan. Data were collected from three data sources: (a) Style of Learning and Thinking to identify students’ thinking style, (b) Science Achievement Test to assess students’ science achievement, and (c) Asian Student Attitudes Toward Science Class Survey to measure students’ attitudes toward science class. Findings revealed that across both boys and girls, there were significant differences between the three modes of thinking with regard to attitudes toward science class but no significant difference between the three modes of thinking with regard to science achievement. Even though students of both genders tended to be more holistic in their thinking, students with an analytic thinking style and an integrative thinking style showed more positive attitudes toward science class than students with a holistic thinking style. Taiwanese male students tended to be more holistic thinking than their female counterparts, whereas Taiwanese female students tended to be more analytic thinking in contrast to male students.
    International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 01/2014; DOI:10.1007/s10763-013-9503-z · 0.53 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
4,607 Downloads
Available from
May 20, 2014