Article

Metabotropic glutamate receptor 1-induced upregulation of NMDA receptor current: mediation through the Pyk2/Src-family kinase pathway in cortical neurons.

Department of Neurology and Center for the Study of the Nervous System Injury, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Journal of Neuroscience (Impact Factor: 6.91). 08/2002; 22(13):5452-61.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The mechanism underlying the upregulation of NMDA receptor function by group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), including mGluR1 and 5, is not known. Here we show that in cortical neurons, brief selective activation of group I mGluRs with (S)-3,5-dihydroxy-phenylglycine (DHPG) induced a Ca(2+)-calmodulin-dependent activation of Pyk2/CAKbeta and the Src-family kinases Src and Fyn that was independent of protein kinase C (PKC). Activation of Pyk2 and Src/Fyn kinases led to increased tyrosine phosphorylation of NMDA receptor subunits 2A and B (NR2A/B) and was blocked by a selective mGluR1 antagonist, 7-(hydroxyamino)cyclopropa[b]chromen-1a-carboxylate ethyl ester, but not an mGluR5 antagonist, 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridine. Functional linkage between mGluR1 activation and NR2A tyrosine phosphorylation through Pyk2 and Src was also demonstrated after expression of these elements in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Supporting functional consequences, selective activation of mGluR1 by DHPG induced a potentiation of NMDA receptor-mediated currents that was blocked by inhibiting mGluR1 or Src-family kinases. Furthermore, antagonizing calmodulin or mGluR1, but not PKC, reduced the basal tyrosine phosphorylation levels of Pyk2 and Src, suggesting that mGluR1 may control the basal activity of these kinases and thus the tyrosine phosphorylation levels of NMDA receptors.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
41 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To enable fertilization, spermatozoa must undergo several biochemical processes in the female reproductive tract, collectively called capacitation. These processes involve protein-kinase A(PKA)-dependent protein tyrosine phosphorylation including phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K). It is not known how PKA, a serine/threonine kinase, mediates tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins. We recently showed that inhibition of serine/threonine phosphatase 1 (PP1) causes a significant increase in phospho-PI3K. In this study, we propose a mechanism by which PKA and PP1 mediate an increase in PI3K-tyrosine phosphorylation, and implicate calmodulin-kinase II (CaMKII) in this process. Inhibition of sperm PP1 or protein-kinase C (PKC), stimulated CaMKII phosphorylation/activation, and inhibition of PKC enhanced PP1 phosphorylation/inactivation. Inhibition of CaMKII, using KN-93, caused significant reduction in phospho-PP1, indicating its activation. Moreover, KN-93 prevented the dephosphorylation/inactivation of PKC. We therefore suggest that CaMKII inhibits PKC, leading to PP1 inhibition and the reciprocal auto-activation of CaMKII. Thus, CaMKII can regulate its own activation by inhibiting the PKC/PP1 cascade. Inhibition of Src family kinases (SFK) caused significant inhibition of CaMKII and PP1 phosphorylation, suggesting that SFK activity results in PP1 inhibition and CaMKII activation. Activation of sperm PKA by 8Br-cAMP revealed an increase in phospho-CaMKII, which was inhibited by PKA inhibitor. Tyrosine phosphorylation of PI3K was stimulated by 8Br-cAMP and by PKC or PP1 inhibition, and was abrogated by CaMKII inhibition. Furthermore, phosphorylation/activation of the tyrosine-kinase Pyk2 was enhanced by PP1 inhibition, and this activation is blocked by CaMKII inhibition. Thus, PKA activates Src, which inhibits PP1, leading to CaMKII and Pyk2 activation, resulting in PI3K tyrosine phosphorylation/activation.
    Reproduction 01/2014; · 3.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Endocannabinoids (eCBs), including AEA and 2-AG, are endogenous signalling mediators involved in many physiological and pathological events. The G protein-coupled cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R) is an important target for eCBs, however additional non-CB1 receptor targets have also been identified. Although recent evidence suggests that NMDA receptor function may be regulated by eCBs, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly characterized. Using acutely isolated CA1 neurons and slices from the hippocampus, we found that both AEA and 2-AG potentiate NMDAR-mediated currents independently of CB1 receptors (CB1Rs) and via distinct signalling pathways. Potentiation by AEA requires the activation of TRPV1 channels. In contrast, potentiation by 2-AG requires the sequential activation of PKC and Src. Additionally, in hippocampal slices, we found that both AEA and 2-AG induce NMDAR-mediated metaplasticity and facilitate the induction of subsequent LTD independently of CB1Rs. Enhanced LTD by AEA, but not 2-AG, was dependent on TRPV1 channels. Our findings reveal previously unrecognized non-CB1R-dependent signalling cascades through which the two major eCBs regulate NMDA receptor function and consequently synaptic plasticity. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Hippocampus 08/2014; · 5.49 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) is a devastating neurodegenerative disease with no effective treatment or cure. In addition to APOE, recent large genome-wide association studies have identified variation in over 20 loci that contribute to disease risk: CR1, BIN1, INPP5D, MEF2C, TREM2, CD2AP, HLA-DRB1/HLA-DRB5, EPHA1, NME8, ZCWPW1, CLU, PTK2B, PICALM, SORL1, CELF1, MS4A4/MS4A6E, SLC24A4/RIN3,FERMT2, CD33, ABCA7, CASS4. In addition, rare variants associated with LOAD have also been identified in APP, TREM2 and PLD3 genes. Previous research has identified inflammatory response, lipid metabolism and homeostasis, and endocytosis as the likely modes through which these gene products participate in Alzheimer's disease. Despite the clustering of these genes across a few common pathways, many of their roles in disease pathogenesis have yet to be determined. In this review, we examine both general and postulated disease functions of these genes and consider a comprehensive view of their potential roles in LOAD risk.
    Current genetic medicine reports. 06/2014; 2:85-101.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
3 Downloads
Available from
Aug 22, 2014