To the Editor: Risks and complications of nonbronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage in a pediatric intensive care unit
Pediatric Pulmonology (Impact Factor: 2.3). 07/2002; 34(1):87-8; author reply 88. DOI: 10.1002/ppul.10124
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Our objective was to determine whether a simple method of maintaining positive pressure ventilation during nonbronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (NB-BAL) would successfully reduce the incidence and/or severity of desaturation events. Our design was a clinical trial with historical controls. Seventy ventilated pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic NB-BAL participated. Two NB-BAL techniques were compared: 1) the "unsealed" method, where the suction catheter was passed through an open system, maintaining oxygenation but not airway pressure; and 2) the "sealed" technique, which was identical except that the catheter was passed through a diaphragm, maintaining positive pressure ventilation throughout. NB-BAL was performed on 35 patients using the "unsealed" technique and 2 years later on 35 patients using the "sealed" method. Heart rate and oxyhemoglobin saturation (SaO(2)) were recorded before, during, and after NB-BAL. There was no difference between groups with regard to demographic data, oxygenation, or ventilatory requirements (P >or= 0.1). The "sealed" group experienced a median drop in SaO(2) of 6.0% (range, -6% to 44%), and the "unsealed" group a drop of 13.0% (-2% to 61%), during NB-BAL (P < 0.05). Patients with oxygenation index greater than 10 experienced the most severe desaturation events in both groups: 53.8% of patients in the "sealed" group with oxygenation index >10 desaturated to <80% vs. 91.6% in the "unsealed" group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, we describe a simple, inexpensive modification of the NB-BAL technique that reduces the incidence and severity of desaturation during NB-BAL.Pediatric Pulmonology 09/2004; 38(3):217-21. DOI:10.1002/ppul.20082 · 2.30 Impact Factor
Article: Filling the Gaps in Neonatal VAPPediatric Critical Care Medicine 01/2013; 14(1):105-6. DOI:10.1097/PCC.0b013e31825b8648 · 2.33 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.