Article

Teaching implications of different educational theories and approaches.

School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis 95616, USA.
Journal of Veterinary Medical Education (Impact Factor: 0.65). 02/2002; 29(2):117-23. DOI: 10.3138/jvme.29.2.117
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Educational theory can and should form the basis for teaching in veterinary medicine. Nevertheless, formal training for teachers in veterinary medicine is uncommon and rarely includes study of different educational theories or perspectives, leaving educators to rely on informal or "hidden" educational constructs to guide them in their everyday teaching. Using a modified case-based format, we present critiques of a hypothetical teaching scenario from four different educational viewpoints: behaviorist, cognitive, social learning, and inspired teaching approaches. The importance and utility of formal educational theory in faculty development is discussed.

9 Bookmarks
 · 
547 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many studies dealing with differences between Students' and doctors’ memory for clinical cases have yielded puzzling results. In this paper it is claimed that these are due to the use of inadequate techniques for isolating chunks inherent in the stimuli and the data. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether the techniques of propositional analysis yield a clearer picture. Using this technique, the analysis of two sets of data is presented. The results show a clear difference between doctors and students when relevant clinical information is isolated from irrelevant information. This supports the notion that the process involved in the memory for clinical cases is far more complex and involves the ability to make inferences from a highly developed knowledge base.
    Medical Education 12/1985; 20(1):3 - 9. · 3.55 Impact Factor
  • 01/1999; National Academy Press..
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study assessed a dissemination approach to improve clinical teaching. We hypothesized that (1) physicians from a variety of institutions nationwide could be trained to conduct teaching improvement seminars for faculty colleagues; (2) such seminars would be perceived as highly useful; (3) pre/post self-evaluations by faculty participants and evaluations of faculty participants by house staff/students would indicate improved teaching performance. Selected medical faculty completed 1 month of facilitator training at the Stanford Faculty Development Program, Palo Alto, Calif. They then delivered teaching improvement seminars for other faculty. From 1986 to 1988, 12 facilitators from 12 institutions trained 107 faculty at their home institutions in their initial seminar series. Their seminars were rated as highly useful by participants. Both faculty self-assessments and house staff/student ratings indicated improved teaching performance. We concluded that this dissemination approach provides one possible mechanism for ongoing teaching improvement within institutions across the country.
    Archives of Internal Medicine 07/1992; 152(6):1156-61. · 11.46 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
494 Downloads
Available from
May 20, 2014