Cost of treating bipolar disorder in the California Medicaid (Medi-Cal) program.

Department of Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy, University of Southern California School of Pharmacy, 1540 E. Alcazar St., Rm. CHP-140, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Journal of Affective Disorders (Impact Factor: 3.71). 10/2002; 71(1-3):131-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0327(01)00394-9
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Bipolar disorder affects approximately 1% of the population at an annual cost of $45 billion in the US. Estimates of non-compliance with mood stabilizer therapy range as high as 64%. The objective of this study was to document the use patterns with mood stabilizers achieved by patients with bipolar disorder and to estimate the direct health care costs associated with sub-optimal drug therapy.
Paid claims for 3,349 California Medicaid patients with bipolar disorder were used to document the use patterns for mood stabilizers achieved by patients with bipolar disorder. The impact of the patient's drug use patterns on likelihood of antipsychotic or antidepressant use within 1 year and health care costs incurred during the first posttreatment year were also estimated.
Only 42.4% of patients used a mood stabilizer during the first posttreatment year; over 60% of treated patients switch or augment their initial therapy within 1 year, and only 5.5% of patients used a mood stabilizer consistently for 1 year. Direct health care costs were significantly higher among those patients who delayed or did not use mood-stabilizing agents during the first year.
Medi-Cal covers poor and disabled patients and is not representative of the general population. Paid claims data do not include clinical markers for severity of illness or treatment response.
Suboptimal use patterns for mood stabilizing medications were frequent and costly. Strategies to improve compliance with mood stabilizer regimens, along with new treatment options, are needed to improve treatment outcomes.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mood disorders affect a significant portion of the general population. Cycling mood disorders are characterized by intermittent episodes (or events) of the disease. Using anonymized Web search logs, we identify a population of people with significant interest in mood stabilizing drugs (MSD) and seek evidence of mood swings in this population. We extracted queries to the Microsoft Bing search engine made by 20,046 Web searchers over six months, separately explored searcher demographics using data from a large external panel of users, and sought supporting information from people with mood disorders via a survey. We analyzed changes in information needs over time relative to searches on MSD. Queries for MSD focused on side effects and their relation to the disease. We found evidence of significant changes in search behavior and interests coinciding with days that MSD queries are made. These include large increases (>100%) in the access of nutrition information, commercial information, and adult materials. A survey of patients diagnosed with mood disorders provided evidence that repeated queries on MSD may come with exacerbations of mood disorder. A classifier predicting the occurrence of such queries one day before they are observed obtains strong performance (AUC=0.78). Observed patterns in search behavior align with known behaviors and those highlighted by survey respondents. These observations suggest that searchers showing intensive interest in MSD may be patients who have been prescribed these drugs. Given behavioral dynamics, we surmise that the days on which MSD queries are made may coincide with commencement of mania or depression. Although we do not have data on mood changes and whether users have been diagnosed with bipolar illness, we see evidence of cycling in people who show interest in MSD and further show that we can predict impending shifts in behavior and interest.
    Journal of Medical Internet Research 02/2014; 16(2):e65. DOI:10.2196/jmir.2664 · 4.67 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim To assess and compare the average annual the cost of illness of outpatients with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Methods Cost of illness in 75 out-patients with bipolar disorder and 53 out-patients with schizophrenia was assessed over a 9-month period by using bottom-up approach. The cost of 9 months was annualized by dividing the 9 months cost by 3 and then multiplying the obtained figure with 4. Results Total average annual costs of care of bipolar disorder was Indian rupees 32,759 (US $ 655.18) and that of schizophrenia was Indian rupees 48,059 (US $ 961.18) and there was no significant difference between the two groups. In both the groups, indirect costs (bipolar disorder- 64.0%; Schizophrenia- 77.6%) were higher than direct costs (bipolar disorder- 32%; Schizophrenia- 17.8%). Cost of medications was high. Patient and their families bore the main brunt of financial burden (95.4-96% of the total cost). In both the group's total treatment costs were significantly higher in those who had lower level of functioning. In bipolar disorder group number of visits to the hospital correlated with total cost, indirect cost and provider's cost, whereas in schizophrenia group total number of visits correlated with provider's cost only. Only a small proportion (13.7%) of the total cost of bipolar disorder was predicted by presence or absence of alcohol dependence and number of visits. In the schizophrenia group, only positive symptom score as per the rating on PANSS appeared as a significant predictor of total cost, explaining 15.6% of the total cost. Conclusion Costs for outpatients with bipolar disorder are similar to the cost of outpatients with schizophrenia. Costs are higher in those with lower level of functioning. Findings of the study suggests that reducing the number of visits to the hospital by providing care at the doorsteps, focusing on reduction of substance use and improving the level of functioning of the patients can reduce the cost of case of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.
    Asian Journal of Psychiatry 08/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.ajp.2014.08.003
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: HIV+ persons with co-occurring bipolar disorder (HIV+/BD+) have elevated rates of medication nonadherence. We conducted a 30-day randomized controlled trial of a two-way, text messaging system, iTAB (n = 25), compared to an active comparison (CTRL) (n = 25) to improve antiretroviral (ARV) and psychotropic (PSY) adherence and dose timing. Both groups received medication adherence psychoeducation and daily texts assessing mood. The iTAB group additionally received personalized medication reminder texts. Participants responded to over 90 % of the mood and adherence text messages. Mean adherence, as assessed via electronic monitoring caps, was high and comparable between groups for both ARV (iTAB 86.2 % vs. CTRL 84.8 %; p = 0.95, Cliff's d = 0.01) and PSY (iTAB 78.9 % vs. CTRL 77.3 %; p = 0.43, Cliff's d = -0.13) medications. However, iTAB participants took ARVs significantly closer to their intended dosing time than CTRL participants (iTAB: 27.8 vs. CTRL: 77.0 min from target time; p = 0.02, Cliff's d = 0.37). There was no group difference on PSY dose timing. Text messaging interventions may represent a low-burden approach to improving timeliness of medication-taking behaviors among difficult-to-treat populations. The benefits of improved dose timing for long-term medication adherence require additional investigation.
    AIDS and Behavior 12/2014; 19(3). DOI:10.1007/s10461-014-0971-0 · 3.49 Impact Factor